Akalifauj

God brought the creation into existence and before creation I did not exist. I had no previous karam (good or bad). How could I, when I did not exist. How can one soul become a Brahmgyani and another goes through hell and through the cycle of birth and death. Neither soul did nothing in the beginning to achieve the initial position. You described an unjust God.

You don't have a clue about what Hukam is. In the way you describe it, we would not have Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji coming to Earth to teach Sikhi. For you everything bad or leads a person in the bad direction you want to describe as Hukam and everything good you want to put down as not following Hukam. You're a full r*tard, not half, but full. It is also Hukam that other members are tell you to get lost. Why have you not accepted this Hukam full r*tard? I don't like using the word r*tard, but you deserve it.

They do the same when they can't explain what Gurdwara means.............it means Sikh temple...........i go to the temple every Sunday because Sunday is a special day for Sikhs as it is Christianity.......Christianity and Sikhism....its the same.........we all believers. :stupidme: :stupidme: :stupidme:

Here is the recording of Sant Baba Gurbachan Singh ji doing katha of what I was explaining in my post. The recording is on www.gurmatveechar.com. under Puratan katha and larivaar saroop of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji file. Forward the recording of ang 1092 to 16:20 minutes. Enjoy.

Simran is defined as to remember Vaheguru in Gurbani. Take a second and think about what Vaheguru is in your mind at this moment? Does a certain Shabad come to mind or is your mind trying to construct through it's own ability a form of Vaheguru, which your ego can accept and understand? If today I was to walk up to a seeker and tell him Vaheguru means a woman wearing a red suit, who is sitting on top of a mountain and eating nuts. Will this person be doing simran of Vaheguru? No! The seeker would be doing simran of a woman sitting on top of a mountain, dressed in a red suit, and eating nuts. When repeating Vaheguru for minutes or hours or days, what is the mind thinking of? Take for example the incident of almost getting into an accident. The common Sikh says Vaheguru in that moment out loud or in their mind. However what is he really thinking about as he says Vaheguru? In that moment the person is saying Vaheguru is my protector. Vaheguru protected me from getting into an accident. The person is remembering a quality of Vaheguru and is focused on this quality of Vaheguru for however long the person feels helpless in that moment. Is this not simran of Vaheguru? If it was, what technique did the person use? Did he have his eyes closed, legs crossed, hands in a certain position? I surely hope his eyes were open, feet close by the brake and race pedal, and his hands on the steering wheel. If not, we know why the accident would have been caused. ਹਰਿ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਧਿਆਇ ਗੁਰਬਾਣੀ ਨਿਤ ਨਿਤ ਚਵਾ ਬਲਿ ਰਾਮ ਜੀਉ ॥ I meditate (do simran) on the Naam, the Name of the Lord, Har, Har. Continuously, continually, I chant the Word of the Guru's Bani. ang 773 Gurbani is the Naam. When reading or singing Gurbani we are able to connect to the divine, if we are focused on the Shabad. When repeating Vaheguru, your mind should be focused on the pure shabad. We remember (do simran of) Vaheguru when we read Gurbani. If we do not remember Vaheguru through Gurbani we are lost in our ego. Gurbani tells us how to remember Vaheguru and exactly what Vaheguru is. Without this, we are lost and thinking something he is not. And you can do all the Vaheguru simran you want but your mind will not receive the peace of mind. Meditation in Sikhi is the next step to remembering Vaheguru; contemplation. The contemplation brings the mind to focus on what Gurbani is saying to you. Meditation on Vaheguru simran is also happening as your focus on the deep meaning of the word Vaheguru and bring your mind to provide the answers through the Shabad Guru. The purpose of closing the eyes and sitting in a quiet room is to help the person quiet the world around him and he really can focus on the Naam. We use a similar technique, when starting to learn about a topic and there is a test coming up for it in a couple of days. However those, who are well learned about the topic, do not need to quiet the world around them through sitting in quiet rooms and closing their eyes to focus. Try it right now. Pick a topic you really know about and go into a very noisy place. While in the noise, start thinking about the topic you are well versed in. You will have no problem contemplating over the topic and going into the deep subjects it covers. In a similar manner we want to do this with Gurbani; become the lotus flower while maya is all around you. You can waste your time with breathing techniques, posture techniques, mudras, etc., but in this case we don't know when the exam time will end. By then it will be too late to ask for another test section.

In Sri Anand Sahib da paath on ang 919 the following line comes about the vedas and Sant Baba Gurbachan Singh ji tells the meaning in his audio katha. ਵੇਦਾ ਮਹਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਉਤਮੁ ਸੋ ਸੁਣਹਿ ਨਾਹੀ ਫਿਰਹਿ ਜਿਉ ਬੇਤਾਲਿਆ ॥ In the vedas Naam is prime, but they don't hear it and they wander around like demons. Sant ji explains how a pandit asked, if in the Vedas the Naam is prime, then what was the reason for Gurbani? Sant ji says learned scholars gave the pandit an answer by saying ਨਾਮੁ ਉਤਮੁ can be only received in the Guru's sangat. They don't even listen to the ਨਾਮੁ ਉਤਮੁ. They are going after karam khand. This means the Vedas know Naam exist, but they can't deliver it. This is Sant ji's view on vedas and not what the secular-quasi religious fanatics fabricate. All he has been doing is propaganda and misusing Sant Baba Gurbachan Singh ji's name. The missionaries do the same with Sant Jarnail Singh ji name. The method of how atma becomes one with Akal Purakh is not known to the vedas or any other vedant scripture. Neither can Vedas unite anyone's atma with Akal Purakh as was just explained in Sant ji's katha. Only Guru's sangat (Gurbani) can unite the atma with Akal Purakh. This person is thick headed. He can't understand Gurbani, yet he acts like he knows everything about it. He sits on this forum and drags Sant Baba Gurbachan Singh ji name into the mud. I don't call him secular-quasi religious fanatics out of hate or anything sinful. But it is the best description of this character. He wants to give the impression of being religious, but all his views are of a secular fanatic.

This is basically harassing a forum by opening up many different threads to push one view by this secular-quasi religious fanatic. The original poster did not ask for your propaganda. He asked for where to locate a book he wants.

What a joke. Sitting on a lion rug signifies letting go of ego and what does wearing a small kirpan around the neck signify? Secular-quasi religious fanatics will take Sikhs away from wearing 5 kakkar and rehat but will drive people toward brahmins mat. Sitting on lion skin scares animals away. People that have a garden and its being attacked by birds, will kill a crow and hang it up. The same is done with giddars (coyotes) in farm land with cows and other animals. Its a common practice done in many parts of the world.

I wonder which insecure Sikh made this sakhi up. Anyway, let's go through the list of holy people in Sikhi and you tell me which one of them dressed up and spent 1000 pounds or similar on one item: Here is a list of holy people who did not follow your fabricated Sakhi: Bhai Mani Singh ji Baba Deep Singh ji Bhai Taru Singh ji Bhai Daya Singh ji Bhai Himmat Singh ji Bhai Kanhaiya ji Baba Gurbaksh Singh ji Sant Nand Singh ji Sant Sundar Singh ji Sant Gurbachan Singh ji Sant Kartar Singh ji Sant Jarnail Singh ji Akali Phula Singh ji Bhai Dharam Singh ji Bhai Mokham Singh ji Bhai Sahib singh ji According to you none of these great souls had an effect on the world because they did not dress up like your fabricated Sakhi.

Taxes go to the government and they spend it to fund many programs, facilities, road, utilities, etc. It doesn't go to the poor. You are a snob for thinking it goes to the poor. Tax dollars pay for healthcare, education, policing, etc. I am surprised, snobs like you don't use government employees as your personal servants. And in fact you don't like the fact "your" earnings are being used to fund the community. Here you are whining about it The Gurus don't advocate Sikhs to dress well as you want to view it. Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji was a farmer, your Guru was a laborer and surely wore clothes for farming. Sorry sis, but us lowly humans can't compete with you higher class snobs. Even Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji is a lowly person in your eyes for dressing like a laborer. For the Guru, dressing well doesn't mean expensive items or spending 1000 pounds on one item. Stop using Sikhi as an escape root for your personal mistakes. I am not upset about you spending money on anything. I could careless. You were used as an example to show how the Gurus don't approve of such behavior. Show me where the Guru says you can buy expensive things? Only a fool would think Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji dressed like a king to say Sikhs can dress like Kings. Read some history and you find out how the Rulers of the Gurus times were not allowing the "average" person wear certain items and keep certain things. The 10th Guru put a stop to this oppression by wearing robes of Kings, kalgi, shastars, keeping horses, large army, etc. Today Sikhs are stopped from wearing the 5 Kakkar. So live up to your Gurus goals and tell us kindly, if you have any of the 5 Kakkar? And if you do, how long is your kirpan, I hope it's not the one you can hide under your expensive clothes and your Kara is skinnier than a hair? Haters................What up G.....thrown them gang signs up..........drop it like its hot.........LOL............Damn you on a whole different level......you be running them tea parties.........with yaa gurlz.............life is so tough when you gotta pay for some poor farmer.....factory working Gurmukhs.............why he sitting around meditating......get up off your a** and do something productive...........lazy poor people. You know what we should do with them..............round all of them up and do what Hilter did..............gas these foools.........good for nothin Anyone want to take the course called Snob 101, please contact 'Richaswell (sigh)', and if you know where her 45% tax dollars are please contact this hotline immediately...... btw................someone makes more money in a year than you would in 10 years and this person don't buy expensive things or is a snob like yourself or goes against his Gurus wishes or blames poor people. This someone isn't too far away either.....mega LOL. You got served son...........you ain't got nothin on no one.............tryin to be all Hollywood........

Other posters and myself see it differently as it is and are not making things up. I said mix with 3HO. This means you have taken up their way of thinking on certain topics; Jesus being one of them, which is contrary to Gurbani (Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji). I did not say you associate with anyone. I never claimed to be a Gursikh. Your imagination is running wild like it does for Jesus Christ stories.

This statement made me cringe. How can you say in a calm way Gurbani is tthe least corrupted teaching of truth? This implies all of Gurbani did not come from Vaheguru. Yet you don't want anyone to show the true story of jesus. Sikh sangat this is the way people start heading when they mix with 3HO. 3HO hold jesus in the same regard as this poster. She is corrupted and not Gurbani. May satguru forgive you and have compassion on your soul for disrespecting Gurbani.

Do as you wish. I was speaking about Sikhi and what it says about lavish items. If you are complaining about paying 45% tax. Go work at Mcdonalds or a factory for just above minimum wage and problem is solved.

You are taking Sant Jarnail Singh ji Khalsa words out of context. Sant ji explains in one video how the Muslims gave the Brahmins the title Hindu, which means theives. So is Sant ji saying Hindus should be thieves? Again taken out of context. Sant ji says if everyone keeps hair uncut everyone will look as a Sikh. In a video where he is giving a response to Hindus about whether Hindus came out of Sikhs or Sikhs came out of Hindus.

Kalki Avtaar was swallowed by death as clearly said in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib. Yet every living thing does not get swallowed by death. Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji on ang 382 says by remembering Akal Purakh, you can escape the Messenger of Death. ਜਾ ਕੈ ਸਿਮਰਣਿ ਜਮ ਤੇ ਛੁਟੀਐ ਹਲਤਿ ਪਲਤਿ ਸੁਖੁ ਪਾਈਐ ॥ Meditating in remembrance on Him, we escape from the Messenger of Death; here and hereafter, we obtain peace. ਸਾਸਿ ਗਿਰਾਸਿ ਜਪਹੁ ਜਪੁ ਰਸਨਾ ਨੀਤ ਨੀਤ ਗੁਣ ਗਾਈਐ ॥੨॥ With every breath and morsel of food, meditate, and chant with your tongue, continually, each and every day; sing the Glorious Praises of the Lord. ||2|| Take the example of Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji. Guru Sahib like Kalki Avtaar came to earth and performed certain duties. Kalki Avtaar took on a body and so did Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji. If every living thing is swallowed by death. Where is the Bani saying Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji was taken by death? Instead Gurbani tells us the opposite about Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji. Take any of the Bhagats, for instance take Bhagat Kabir ji. Where in Gurbani does it say Bhagat Kabir ji was taken by death as Sri Dasam Granth Sahib says about Kalki Avtaar being conquered/swallowed/taken by death. Bhagat ji lived on earth as Kalki Avtaar did on earth. The difference from Bhagat Kabir ji and Kalki Avtaar is the above pauri. Bhagat ji remembered Akal Purakh and Kalki Avtaar did not. Listen to this next line on ang 249. Guru Sahib is telling us what happens to the soul when Vaheguru does his kirpa on you. ਕਾਲੁ ਕੰਟਕੁ ਲੋਭੁ ਮੋਹੁ ਨਾਸੈ ਜੀਅ ਜਾ ਕੈ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਬਸੈ ॥ The pains of death, greed and emotional attachment simply vanish, when God comes to dwell in the soul. Also listen to this line on ang 472 where Guru Sahib tells us, where the soul goes when Vaheguru does not do his kirpa on you. ਨਾਨਕ ਹੰਸਾ ਆਦਮੀ ਬਧੇ ਜਮ ਪੁਰਿ ਜਾਹਿ ॥੨॥ O Nanak, the mortal's soul goes, bound and gagged to the city of Death. ||2|| It's a shame one pankti of Gurbani from Sukhmani Sahib is being taken out of context to present the secular-quasi religious fanatics mindset. It is also a shame a Gurmukhs name is being dragged into the mud to present a pandits mindset as true. Yet I am glad to let Gurbani speak for itself. No support needed from anything or anyone.

Singh 3HO are not even close to being in Samadhi because their mudras, and yogic postures drag them into duality. This is the case of the blind men and the elephant for those who use anyway to protect them. I have nothing against 3HO other than their manmukh practices. If anyone of them are like Bhagat Dhanna Jatt ji who took a stone to be Akal Purakh then one or two of them could have been fooled in the same manner and had the same dedication as Bhagat Dhanna Jatt ji and achieved the highest state of them all. However this does not make 3HO or their practices correct. This says the naive follower had child like innocence and sat their waiting for Akal Purakh for days and hours with full faith and achieved mukhti. However this is not exclusive to 3HO, but can happen to anyone. If 3HO taught Gurbani is the only mudra, yogic posture, and breathing technique to learn, they would be able to be in samadhi like any other Sikh out there. Samadhi term is being thrown around in this thread like the Sant term is attached to every joe blow out there, who shows some false commitment to Akal Purakh.

No you mean they have yogi life down and not Sikhi Unless you went into their mind and know their full mind state you cannot say, they went into deep deep samadhi. So they sat like yogi stones and pretended to be in Samdhi. Again, stop confusing Sikhi with yogi practice. They have yogi practice down. I see so many 3HO members worshipping in front of stones, killing kids at camps and covering it up, running illegal drugs and guns into foreign countries, defrauding many people out of their money to sell their fake yogi practices, and don't forget about being cowards and intimidating Sikhs trying to expose their true nature. And lets not forget the rapist yogi bhajan rapping his own followers and calling it holy. Yet you have never spoken up against the same punjabi Sikhs you label bad who deal with Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji's beadbi. Punjabi Sikhs are not good enough to deal with 3HO constant beadbi, but they can deal with beadbi of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji. 3HO is some kind of God for you. It's clear where your loyalty lies. 3HO are not balanced. They allow gay marraiges, they allow stone worship, they allow the beadbi of Gurbani and accept it. You want to speak of balance, then find someone better to represent balance.

E-mail me.............lol...........secular-quasi religious fanatics are too funny. Beat them with their own stick and they still don't learn. Eagle eye view says to load up the 3HO coward video as you have loaded the other videos with your hate for Punjabi Sikhs foaming out from the corners and down from the front.

This is becoming amusing now. Let's look at some statements from eagle eye view..lol...had to say it. Anyway let's get into it. I want people to look at the first time the word "all" is used in this statement. The same poster used Gurbani to prove his point, but in absolute reality he just disproved what he said. ਜਬ ਏਕਹਿ ਹਰਿ ਅਗਮ ਅਪਾਰ ॥ ਤਬ ਨਰਕ ਸੁਰਗ ਕਹੁ ਕਉਨ ਅਉਤਾਰ ॥ When there was only the unapproachable and limitless Lord. Who went to hell and heaven and who was born? This pankti is talking about when only Akal Purakh existed. This means there was NO ALL there was only ONE. How can you turn around and say there was all (other things in existence), when Gurbani says there was only ONE? From absolute point of view there is ONLY ONE as the pankti clarifies. Okay now lets talk about this so called relative reality( this statement is deeply rooted in duality with the words "all"). Gurbani says even though the creation started to exist there is still ONLY ONE. So in relative reality where does this ALL exist? It doesn't!! it is a construction of the secular-quasi religious fanatics minds to mislead those who pay attention to it. Wake up and start reading Gurbani and arming yourself with this infinite knowledge. You cannot be always spoon fed this knowledge. Do not rely on others. Creation is maya(a dream, non existent) and Akal Purakh has sunk the devi and devta like Kalki Avtaar into it. In Creation they failed to realize Akal Purakh. ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਕੀ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਤਿ ਸਰੂਪੁ ਹੈ ਗੁਰਬਾਣੀ ਬਣੀਐ ॥ Satguru's Bani is the true form, become one with Gurbani. ang 304

Kalki Avtaar Bani tells how Kalki will destroy the enemies and as Kalki Avtaars forces become stronger, Kalki Avtaar will be engrossed in ego. This ego will drive Kalki to believe he is the One True God and Vaheguru will send his army to destroy Kalki Avtaar.

Sant ji was right. Everyone is making the same excuse for their own shortcomings......some miracle from the sky will come down and that's when I will do a, b, and c. Everyone has to stop fooling themselves. Kalyug is only going to get stronger as time continues. People of the past were more giving and compassionate. They were poor and barely could make ends meet, but they were the most giving. They trusted Akal Purakh without any doubt and lived life happily. Today people look around the world and see only hell and try to rationalize why they can't give. Sikhs left their homeland to find a better life in a foreign land, but they were better off staying in India because these parents offspring have turned into the beast, who robbed them of their homeland peace and comfort.

Those who like the nicer things in life and spend 1000 pounds on items should ask themselves, Am I Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji? The Guru is the Guru and the Sikh. A Sikh is and always a Sikh and cannot become the Guru. Today a Sikh cannot even become a Sikh and they want to do act like the Guru? Once Upon a time there was supernatural being named Krishna. Krishna was sent to teach Akal Purakhs path and he got caught up in the world. Krishna was given many supernatural powers as well. He was suppose to only use them in Satgur Parsad kirpa, but he used them to hold his name as the only true God. At the end Krishna died in this world and lived happily as worms and insects ate his corpse. What does this story have to do with being rich. Krishna was rich, nothing could stop him, but Yama (death). Krishna did not earn anything, though he thought he did. What makes one person rich and another poor? No one earned to be given more intelligence than another or to be born in a rich house or to be born in a house where life comes easy. What have you earned? Nothing! In a split second Vaheguru can take the intelligence and money and wash it down the drain, so the Sikh can learn what it means to earn. In a split second he gives and takes and then gives again. Buy 20 000 pounds diamonds and throw them in the river. I know what your thinking, what a waste of money. Well someone brought Guru Gobind Sahib ji jewels and he throw them in the river running behind him. You want to dress like the Guru, so act like the Guru. It is completely ridiculous to be spending 1000 dollars on purses, shirts, shoes, clothes, accessories and this cannot be justified in Sikhi. There is no justification to buy expensive items in Sikhi. 1000 pounds can pay for one Gurmat class being taught by one teacher back in india. If today Vaheguru gives all the world's money to the poor, we would get rid of world starvation and everyone would have a roof over their head.

Best reply

I agree. Let's go secular-quasi religious fanatic, I know you are watching in the shadows. Did you lose your fingers and cannot type anymore? What is taking so long post this video also up with the same title as you have done before with Sikhs of Punjabi descent.