MisterrSingh

Where's she from?

These so-called men of God will be the death of us all. ?

Talk to a fellow Singhni or thrash it out with your husband, and stop trying to induce the males on this site to further enquire as to the particulars of your salacious nocturnal activities. Rando internet weirdos aren't of much help in these situations. Everyone else: don't fall for the bait.

Makes you think: treasure Sikh scriptures and preserve their authenticity. God knows how devils in our community will try to alter or erase sections of Gurbani for various nefarious reasons over the centuries to come. Vigilance is key.

Couple of centuries? Approx 1820? Lol, they started chopping and changing from 500 A.D. onwards. Jesus the personality was co-opted by the Holy Roman Empire for political purposes. His life and his teachings were whitewashed and watered-down for the purposes of establishing dominion over the people of Europe.

Justinian also introduced more changes to Christian doctrine. He convened the Second Synod of Constantinople in 553 A.D. The Synod was neither attended nor, apparently, sanctioned by the Pope in Rome. At that time, in fact, many of the changes to Christian doctrine in the eastern Roman empire had not yet reached the Papacy, although they eventually would. The Second Synod issued a decree banning the doctrine of "past lifetimes," or "reincarnation," even though the doctrine was an important one to Jesus. The Synod decreed: If anyone assert the fabulous pre-existence of souls and shall submit to the monstrous doctrine that follows from it, let him be anathema [excommunicated]. In deference to that decree, all but very veiled references to "pre-existence" were taken out of the Bible. Belief in preexistence was declared heresy. This suppression was enforced throughout the western Christian world and in its sciences. The idea of personal pre-existence still remains, to a very large degree, a Western religious and scientific heresy. From the Buddhist biography, The Unknown Life of Jesus: In his fourteenth year, young Issa, the Blessed One, came this side of the Sindh [a province in Western Pakistan] and settled among the Aryas [Aryans]. . . .' But the Brahmins and the Kshatriyas [members of the priestly & military castes] told him that they were forbidden by the great Brahma [Hindu god] to come near to those who were created from his belly and his feet [the mythical origin of the lower castes]; That the Vaisyas [members of the merchant and agricultural caste] might only hear the recital of the Vedas, and this only on the festival days, and That the Sudras [one of the lower castes] were not only forbidden to attend the readings of the Vedas, but even to look on them; for they were condemned to perpetual servitude, as slaves of the Brahmins, the Kshatriyas and even the Vaisyas. But Issa, disregarding their words, remained with the Sudras, preaching against the Brahmins and Kshatriyas. He declaimed strongly against man's arrogating to himself the authority to deprive his fellow-beings of their human and spiritual rights. "Verily," he said, "God has made no difference between his children, who are all alike dear to Him." Issa denied the divine inspiration of the Vedas and the Puranas [a class of sacred writings]...

Why not encourage just the one religion from the start? The conflict, destruction, and kintu-prantu competing faiths would cause surely isn't worth multiple attempts at creating a path to God. A Creator, in his infinite wisdom and omniscience, would realise the Jews, Christians, and Musleh would be at each other's throats for millennia.

Eh, vote him in and see what happens. If he works against Sikh interests, at least you'll know for sure.

It's quite disappointing to realise that the ills of the world will never truly be solved in our lifetimes despite the clamour to do so. I don't even think they'll be solved in a thousand years. I do feel we're at the beginning of something, although what form that change will take place is anyone's guess. Cataclysms, apocalypses, and heraldic messiahs have been a cornerstone of most advanced civilisations for tens and thousands of years. The assumption that we're living in the age where "it" will transpire and that we'll emerge from the other end of that turbulence is foolish. Our era and time on this planet as it relates to the totality of the planet's existence is less than a drop in the ocean of time. We are infinitesimally insignificant in the broader picture. Stop dreaming of a future you'll never experience, and start making the best of what you've been given.

Makes you wonder why they'd restrict all incoming flights into India in that type of situation if it wasn't in response to an act or a moment where Sikhs felt compelled to travel to India to offer their support.

The sad thing is for those who end up in these situations is actually a two-pronged issue: 1. People don't really change. They may pretend as if they've had some great revelation that's drawn them to the light but it's pakandh most of the time, and if, by chance, there is some brief moment of introspection and desire to turn over a new leaf it isn't permanent. Apne lack a conscience to see things through. We're like children with a new toy at times; the novelty eventually wears off, and we return to what were previously. 2. Singhs don't listen. I assume such stubbornness is rooted in a combination of desire / affection for the girl and an overestimation of their own abilities. It always surprises me how even the most mediocre woman can bring a fairly competent man to his knees. What chance does a sheltered and gullible guy have against such a person?

Aim higher than Shapiro and Yiannopoulous. Their respective schtick is about sowing discord and entrenchment; it's not about discovering the truth and devising solutions. These clowns are media whores. Shapiro is so lol. The issues he rallies against are 99% rooted in the socio-cultural policies pushed over decades by the intellectuals and elites of his race, yet he never ever mentions their role in the issues of today. A total charlatan who banks on the ignorance of his audience. It's like blaming a gunshot wound for blood loss that eventually leads to death but refusing to call out the guy who pulled the trigger.

If he doesn't want to have kids then I would suggest he doesn't have sex. No need for a vasectomy.

Avoid, or at least view with the most critical glance, anything that derives from Jewish social theory and critical philosophy.

He admits he's an entertainer. It's tamasha with extremely rare nuggets of truth interspersed amongst the nonsense. I listened to him over a decade ago for a month or so, and I clocked his act. You won't get anywhere with beliefs in inter-dimensional lizards and shape-shifting demons. How's that going to convince your average person -- who isn't even ready to admit that democracy and partisan politics is a sham -- that there's something rotten with the world? What can the average person do about such things? All it does is engender a feeling of helplessness. Start with the so-called boring stuff: politics, sociology, contemporary history, etc. Read the work of guys like Noam Chomsky and Jon Pilger, and try to absorb what they're imparting about the System in a way that can be discussed and analysed. But always question, question, question, and keep to the forefront of your mind whether there are any issues that correlate to the teachings of Gurbani, because that's something I always do. The Occult is a subject that fascinates me, but you can't seriously attempt to make sense of the world by grounding your entire worldview in such wildly unreliable and unprovable matters.

There's many Sikh sants and mahapurash who we'd consider to be "good guys" that aren't married and are childless. You can't use that as a marker to condemn one man and then simultaneously elevate and praise others for it being proof of their holiness. This sadhguru guy is nothing more than an astute personality regurgitating cod-Eastern philosophy for primarily Western consumption. It sounds radical and innovative because of how far we've fallen as a civilisation.

Canada is the Punjabi Babylon, lmao. Europe ain't perfect, but we've got a few years to go before we hit Canadian lows.

Cake? What's wrong with besan, you blasphemers? And I don't mean the sweet and greasy besan; the dry, coarse, crumbly besan that the old bibiya make in the Gurdwara when they have a few spare hours; the besan that makes you cough and splutter after one bite is what I'm talking about. Were there cakes in puratan times?!?

No worries. We probably haven't showered ourselves in glory with the nonsense being spouted, but to err is human, lol.

Guys bust each other's chops all the time. It's what fellers do. Don't take it so seriously even though it may seem a bit hostile at times. I don't bear grudges as long as the sentiment is reciprocated. You're a smart guy. I respect your intelligence. Take it easy, faggot. ?

Since he started stalking me. Plus, don't even bother with the higher moral ground. You haven't got a leg to stand on with your derogatory language aimed at gays. Do you want me to point you in the direction of your own posts?

No and yes. As someone earlier stated, there are TOO many coincidences, similarities, and shared mythologies, across the pre-historical civilisations and the later Egyptians, Greeks and Romans, for every culture to have its own pantheon of divine beings responsible for their own particular part of the world. Why'd do you think Guru Nanak Dev Ji states that there have been many, many iterations of the likes of Brahma, Indra, Shiva, etc., who've lived and died countless times? Because these so-called gods aren't immortal and are susceptible to death. Sure, they may have greater lifespans compared to us humans, but it seems they too must eventually die. Even if you were to limit this to the exclusive idea of Indian personalities, the line in Japji Sahib can still be accurately applied. My theory is that they're "gods" (as we humans view them) in much the same way a dog or a cat perceives humans and -- if animals are capable of some form of rudimentary recognition of life-forms -- consider us to be different to their own species in a way that they perhaps perceive us to be an advanced life-form. I also believe their human-like personality traits such as pride, anger, jealousy, lust, etc., are why they were given such short shrift in Gurbani. They established systems for their own worship instead of encouraging the exclusive worship of the One.

Sometimes. It genuinely requires a King Solomon-esque approach of adjudging issues on a case-by-case basis. But we all know that isn't always the reality when practiced.