MisterrSingh
-
Posts
7,295 -
Joined
-
Days Won
225
Content Type
Profiles
Calendar
Forums
Everything posted by MisterrSingh
-
Yes, I'd like to echo the above suggestion that your objection might be interpreted as envy on your part. Tread carefully.
-
What are the origins of the fefty? I'm guessing the military.
-
If we used the same tactics of mocking them by using their religious terminology and ways, they'd throw one of their infamous hissy fits. -
Would A Transgender Amritdhari Sikh Be A Singh or Kaur?
MisterrSingh replied to TheeTurbanator's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
True. That doesn't mean there's something inside of them that doesn't crave the Guru. How they manage to get there is anybody's guess. -
Would A Transgender Amritdhari Sikh Be A Singh or Kaur?
MisterrSingh replied to TheeTurbanator's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
That's fine. You're an excellent contributor to this forum, and I respect your opinions. You know I'm not one for advocating degeneracy and the kind of nonsense that passes for modern life in certain circles, but sometimes we forget that behind the ideologies and the loud voices, there are people like you and I who are just trying to make sense of it all, and maybe I'm being naive, but I'd like to think a bit of understanding and compassion for people goes a long way. I'm not suggesting we start conducting Anand Karaj ceremonies for trans people, lol. -
Would A Transgender Amritdhari Sikh Be A Singh or Kaur?
MisterrSingh replied to TheeTurbanator's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
That's harsh, bro. -
Womandeep, or for the gender uncertain, Xirdeep.
-
Then pretend he was joking in order to save face. ?
-
I genuinely thought the kids were 2, 3, and 5 months, lmao. I went back and reread the original post, and it makes sense now, because unless she was growing the poor kids in plant pots, there's no way they could be that young! That's fine; my mum dressed me in bana when I was 5. I had a tiny dastaar, mini kirpaan, chola, etc., on special religious occasions. Still, I would sound a warning that very young children shouldn't be wielded as religious accessories designed to virtue signal one's religious adherence. They aren't an extension of their parents' religiosity. Knowing our mindset as a community, we are prone to prioritising the external over the internal, and in that respect I'd argue since the child isn't fully aware of why they're being dressed up in that way, there's no spiritual benefit in doing so, because it's not a conscious choice on their part. However, if we're talking about "training" children to become accustomed to our ways and traditions, then starting them out early is a good thing.
-
You're that American Punjabi cuck who worships goreh, aren't you? Your name escapes me. Your prodigious use of LOL and undeniable air of mental retardation gave you away. Why don't you post with your regular account? We can get better acquainted. ?
-
It's one way to get very young children to resent their religion and their traditions from the get-go. What form of cognition does a child of a few months possess that he or she could possibly be judged to be adhering to the particulars of their faith in that way? At that age it's akin to dressing up little dolls and showing them off to family and friends. I understand the need to start them off early, particularly in these irreligious times, but start with naam before anything else.
-
So you're back to agreeing with me that the man on the street is enabling these individuals into power, lol? Befqoof. You don't know your chittar from your elbow. Bandhar.
-
The white leadership. The politicians and the well-connected. There's a huge difference between the everyday man and woman and the people in charge.
-
Yes, they're what's commonly termed as the Ashkenazi Jews, who have Central European roots and congruous genetic features fairly similar to Anglo Saxons. There's another subgroup termed as Sephardic Jews, who resemble the Spanish and Portuguese.
-
The Labour Party will provide Britain with its first Prime Minister from a Muslim background as the Muslim population of Britain surges past the 10% mark in the coming decades. Dependent on various social situations, we will eventually see the Islamic equivalent of an anti-Semitism law. When that happens, just know that's the landmark moment that will herald the beginning of the squeeze on all non-Muslim minorities in Britain. Certain foolish, misguided whites will enable their own destruction, and drag down the rest of us with them. The seeds are being sown as of now. As amusing as it is to see the racists so agitated at this admittedly sound bit of science, it's a small piece of the puzzle in the larger scheme of things. I don't expect the kind of people who struggle to see what'll happen by the end of next week to be capable of recognising and extrapolating current developments decades into the future.
-
In Canada? That's a shame. I thought there'd be at least a few who are fighting the good fight.
-
I'm glad prominent Sikh representation in the Canadian government is annoying the Indian regime. It's amusing to see the Indian government constantly raise concerns and undermine foreign Sikhs to whichever western government it deals with at the time, almost suggesting that one key condition of Indian cooperation hinges on how well the western government in question undermines its Sikh population under the flimsy pretence of preventing "extremism." Unfortunately, Indian economic influence means they are, and will be, heard to a certain degree. It's so obvious how the Indian apparatus wants the Sikh diaspora to be toothless, voiceless, and powerless. Seeing Canadian Sikhs in somewhat influential and visible roles in Canadian politics must be so galling for India. British Sikhs would do well to follow their example when it comes to political engagement and involvement.
-
Yes, I agree. Considering most of us on this site are religious to varying degrees, I think it's okay to suggest that what we're discussing can be pinned on a certain spiritual malaise that's affecting people, coupled with definite social issues that's also contributing to these problems. Whether these issues stem from something tangible that can be identified and rectified is debatable.
-
Islam is the answer. Islam will succeed where others fear to tread. It will restore order and propriety to a decadent and degenerate culture that is determined to destroy itself. I'd feel sorry for the West only if it wasn't deserved. Any culture, race, or group that is blind to its inevitable destruction, and not only ignores the signs but eagerly heralds its own demise deserves nothing but contempt. Whether we drown with Westerners or not is a choice that is diminishing with every moment until there'll be no choice remaining at all. Nah, I'm kidding, divorce is all the rage in Punjab, too. Ain't no goreh there. ?
-
It's driven by business interests that have tapped into a market that's ripe for profit extraction. The ideological intent at the heart of these industries is debatable, and without evidence it's difficult to say either way. Basically, if there is an insidious agenda behind it all, it can be easily denied, and the accuser will end up resembling an unhinged loon. It does seem that the people behind these industries are acutely aware of the general characteristics of our collective psychology in a broad sense. Accordingly, their products are tailored to hit those marks and encourage us to "consume." Again, is it just basic capitalism or something more? Who knows.
-
Keep it up. Artistic expression is a wonderful outlet for all those little thoughts and feelings inside of us that wouldn't otherwise see the light of day.
-
Technically, that's excellent. Good work. Historically, you probably don't need me to tell you it's far from accurate, lol.
-
Subpar trolling, btw. Don't reveal your hand so easily.
-
Pandora's Box can never be closed, unless you go all ISIS on people, but that defeats the point of pursuing a spiritual path. Plus, the controversy and politics surrounding the enforcement of such AK guidelines, as suggested by OP, would be considered ultra-conservative at best, and extreme at worst. It would garner attention from the usual suspects for whom adherence to any form of identity, be it religious, national, etc., is considered to illiberal and antiquated, and you can guarantee the hit pieces flowing forth from even our own people in the western media would be framed on the lines of, "The Talibanisation of Sikhism." We are our own biggest enemies. There's no loyalty or affinity for Sikhi amongst the influential albeit non-orthodox sections of our people, moreso the so-called intellectuals who possess influence or a voice that can further our interests. We are all too eager to placate the "other" at the expense of our long-term goals. In contrast, we need only glance at Muslims to see the opposite in effect. It's actually quite startling how their prominent voices band together for their collective progression on the most important issues that face them, even when the supposedly insurmountable Sunni-Shia / 'progressive-slightly less progressive' divide separates them. It's funny when you see "opponents" gaming the media system and appearing to be in conflict, when in actuality they are on the same side. It's a long game being played, and they're playing it superbly. Even their most liberal of adherents are burrowing away for their long-term interests in the west. But I digress.