Jump to content

Sukhvirk1976

Members
  • Posts

    878
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Sukhvirk1976

  1. I think your confusing a number of more or less recognised threads.. As it is well documented and ironically a point of agreement by all agencies involved (ie. khalistani militants, ISI, Indian government). The ISI provided strategic support and training to militant outfits.. Sant bhindrawales at a ideological level not being one of those. However babbar khalsa, and many other outfits were trained and funded by Pakistan.. Israel had very little to do with it at all
  2. Interesting.. Can you please provide a source of where you are getting your information.. My understanding is that her father was killed in battle against Muhamed and his men killed him. But I have never read anything to suggest he raped her? Nor any reference to him murdering her whole family.. In fact I am under the impression that after her father was killed she was married and divorced twice and that Muhamed was her third husband..? Moreover what I find particularly interesting is that no where in bani or any writings of sikh scholars Muhamed is spoken of as a rapist.. Why would guru nanak dev ji travel to mecca, (if you believe that sakhi) if he thought Muhamed was a rapist, why would guru arjun Dev Ji invite a follower of a rapist Mian Mir to lay the foundation at Harmandir Sahib, why would guru gobind Singh Ji keep relations with Pir Baba bhuddu shah if he followed such people?
  3. I was just pointing out that not everything is black and white.. Sometimes it feels like all this site is about is nindya and finding faults in others
  4. Also I believe Muhamed himself married a woman of Jewish decent
  5. Believing in the 11 Gurus and bani is not mutually exclusive to being a liberal person.. Quite the opposite I would say.. Liberalism is very much inherent to sikhi
  6. This is quite frankly an outrageous.. The tweet you referred to does nothing of the sort of stuff you are suggesting.. You have shown your own self interest and bigotry by interpreting the tweet in that way.. Are you PR troll working for Britain First?
  7. This is why I have a issue with basics of sikhi
  8. The whole thing is a oxymoron and illustrative of the myopic outlook that has come to dominate the discourse of the Sangat
  9. No one said the first panj pyare to take khande da Pahul... But the fact one wasn't doesn't mean they can't... The first khande da Pahul amrit sanchar involved a woman.. So there was female participation..
  10. How ridiculous a analysis.. Do you know who was the 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th person to take khande da Pahul?
  11. Bro kaam cannot be measured in such simple ways.. Kaam is not sexual desire Kaam is the abuse of sexual desire
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use