puzzled

Yh when they say they want us to integrate they basically want us to drop all our religious/cultural identity start speaking english only not wear religious/cultural outfits or any of our practises and want us to start binge drinking and have public sex in ibiza with every1 clapping and cheering on. But at the same time they want us to know that we were slightly inferior much of this above is already being done by punjabis. Certain other religions are not openly conforming to this and thats why they irritate the goreh a lot. Punjabis are people pleasers so they are more than happy to bend over and receive some from the goreh.

I think marathas fought a battle with the aurangzeb which lasted over a decade? Think it's called battle of Deccan. I read how aurangzeb involvement in this long battle was one of the reasons why the empire started crumbling after him. He invested to much time there that the mughals in the north started plotting against him and becoming corrupt. It would be interesting to read about aurangzebs psychology! Like what was going on in his head.

I recognize some of those faces in those tweets sonam mahajan is strange mix of liberal <banned word filter activated>, cow rakhsha and anti Khalistan it's what her whole twitter is about. Shes also a dogra fron jammu the same ethnicity that the dogra brothers that betrayed sikhs in anglo sikh war.

Hindus want us to mould into what they want us to be when we refuse to be this mould they call us terrorists and what not. A lot sikhs have this strange idea that they have to be either pro hindu or pro muslim they have no understanding of being independent.

Yh I'm gnna learn while this virus thing is going on sikh2inspire have started a series on cooking too

bhai jagraj singh He was the reason how i came into Sikhi people whose lives he changed will remember him for a very long time. I dnt think theres been any british sikh whose ever had the kind of impact that bhai jagraj had not sure about the older days but since my time no one has had that kind of impact. i just stopped watching their videos after that i like listening to old katha by the sants they have this old world charm about them that i really like.

This was written by Parveen Babi a bollywood actress who had mental illness, schizophrenia. I have no idea what she was trying to write! lol the whole thing just went over my head. She wrote this in 1997. her mental illness was quite bad and she accused Amitabh Bachchan, Bill Clinton and Prince Charles of threatening her! The Age of Philosophy: A Critique of Pure Reason By Parveen Babi Our contemporary society erroneously defines a philosopher as any individual who conducts a logical analysis of existing and apparent reality. This perhaps is proof that contemporary society no longer produces true philosophers. Rationalist philosophers from Aristotle to Bertrand Russell have given philosophy methods of conducting syllogistic inferences and logical analysis and down the ages, these techniques have become so synonymous with philosophy, and the practice of true philosophic explorations so rare, that today, the practice of logical analysis has erroneously been taken to mean the practice of philosophy. Philosophy is man's search for aspects of his existence hitherto unknown to him, regarding which his curiosity is naturally aroused, and his answers to this search, holding true universally. A philosopher is one who with his thought and intuition changes the course of mankind and takes human consciousness one step forward. A philosopher is thus an individual with a curiosity about certain aspects of human existence. He possesses a certain extraordinary and irrepressible original substance which compels him to become curious, to search, and to make a statement about his search and its answer. My above statements give rise to another question: Is it necessary for philosophy always to be based on pure reason? I would like to ask another question in reply to the above: What if the philosophy of pure reason is discovered to be lacking? Should the modern world, even then, continue to follow the philosophy of reason? If the philosophy of reason was true and perfect unto itself, then it would have led the human race to perfection. But today, after centuries of following the philosophy of reason, corruption and moral decay are rampant in society. The proof of the validity of a civilisation's philosophical system comes from its effect on that civilisation. And our modern civilisation's philosophy of reason has only created chaos and corruption. Reason, evidently, seems to be able to conduct perfect calculations by itself, but these seemingly perfect calculations are perfect merely in their deductive capacity. Deductive logic, though capable of conducting perfect deductive calculations, lacks wisdom and the universal positive values required to reflect on the ultimate aspects of human existence. Pure logic in philosophy has yet to come up with a technique of inference which is faultless. Pure mathematical and scientific logic, while possessing the capacity for deductive and analytical calculations, has led man to his destruction by inventing scientific and technological phenomena which give him the capacity to destroy himself. And since science deals in pure reason and scientists conduct their enquiries and inventions without the involvement of universal positives their actions have invariably been conducted in the negative direction of giving a few individuals the supreme power: the means of destroying the human race. In fact, after a few inceptional enquiries, most of the significant scientific endea-vours of the 20th century have been conducted with a destructive motive. The division of the atom was conducted in order to create the apparatus of the atomic bomb. Even the invention of computer technology has been conducted with the motive of creating a supreme deductive intelligence to be used for warfare, political power and control. It is time that we adopted what the greatest philosophers of mankind Jesus Christ, Mohammad and Buddha taught the highest order of reason combined with belief — belief in the positive, the truth, a higher reality, which helped them attain perfection, and which helped them lead humanity towards the attainment of perfection. It is not necessary to limit philosophy to reason and separate it from spiritual philosophy. Belief is the capacity, nurtured in human individuals, to recognise and acknowledge the ultimate truth — God. Belief was first inculcated in human beings by God providing evidence to them of his self and his positives. However, the majority of humanity is not capable of (true) belief. If they were capable of (true) belief, then they would not be able to subscribe to the gross corruption of human society. Because belief — the capacity for the positive — is also the incapacity to subscribe to the negative, corruption. Belief is generated only out of the reasonably refined, evolved substance. When the individual's substance becomes reasonably refined, then it generates both belief and healthy reason. Healthy reason is reason which is reined in by belief, which is supported by belief, which is combined with belief, and which is incapable of negative. I also believe that the function of human philosophy today ought to be to solve the existentialistic problems of man, instead of getting self-involved, and intensely microscopic about abstractions or epistemological and syllogistic explorations about the perception of reality. The purpose of man's thought — his philosophy — according to me is to help him attain fulfilment in his worldly existence and lead him to perfection of the self and the species. And, of course, the ultimate function of man's thought is to lead him to God perfection and to help himself realise Godhood."

any1 can get cancer though ...

thanks so it was some point in the 90s where things started going down hill and have been ever since it seems we become better sikhs when we are pushed to the limit yh after bhai jagraj singh bos is not the same i stopped watching their videos after him.

? shes a really gd cook though i like how she mixes ethnic flavors into her western dishes lol its true that most older punjabi men like my dad know how to cook but many younger people dnt know anymore i dnt know how to cook myself im gnna start learning

yh i used to think all the punjab policemen kept their hair but most of them dnt and they wear their pagh like a hat! whats the point of that! in india you can tell from the back of their neck that they are moneh with paghs stupid really my mums brother in india knows a few policeman and one came around our house with his pagh in his had and he was monah! and then they just pop it back on then people wonder why sikhi is struggling

^^^^ absolutely something not mentioned biggest threat to sikhi is people not practicing sikhi! cutting their kes, not doing nitnem and simran. biggest threat is "sikhs" not being sikhs at least back in the 90s you could tell it was a sikh house because the little boys would have guttis now parents dnt even keep their kids kes

i dnt even know how to cook but cooking videos are therapeutic lol my favorite is nigella lawson, i love watching her shows lol a paki female i worked with told me its important for a man to know how to cook because its one way a woman/wife controls her man when shes the only 1 that knows how to cook. and that came from a female... females operate in ways we dnt understand lol

yum

i like tikki and paneer burgers in india but i dnt like it when they put noodles in your burger as well! i dnt eat many animal products anymore

Most these policemen are actually just moneh the pagh is fake they just stick the pagh on like a hat Iv noticed this in india aswell

interesting

but i guess this battle gave sikhs in punjab to build power abdali just looted delhi and left while martha lost the north after the battle while abdali was in delhi his uncle in afghanistan started claiming his throne look at how afghans looted india they were invaders and then look what the americans/british did to them they too were invaders karma

yh they show it the movie how the smaller hindu/muslim kingdoms were complaining of how the marthas were heavily taxing them. and when the marthas were sending messengers to the various smaller kingdoms some agreed to be allies while some didnt because of the taxes many hindu kingdoms sided with abdali

looks really tasty ?

paki muslims h8 her actually indian muslims like congress

yup i remember reading that too rural sikhs had more fear of police than any other community.

dayummm !!! i would be sh1tting myself