The Khalsa Fauj

Hook up the msn of Sukha Singh. As for understanding it. It isn't our fault if most of western youth has issues understanding literature in Gurmukhi script.

Word Nanak appears many times in Jpji Sahib. Also Sodar Shabad in Rehras also has Mhla 1.

blind follower of rss

I understand that you are hurt, but we have to follow Gurmat. Guru Ji never said Chandi Di Vaar is my bani and read it. It was never read in old times. Tom. someone can give us anything and say here is Guru Ji's bani, read it follow it. We can't just take anything for granted except for Guru Granth Sahib Ji. Anything else. we need to measure on the philosophy of Guru Granth Sahib Ji. There is a lot of anti Gurmat stuff in chandi di vaar, e.g. Durgaa Paath Bnaaya Sabhay Pauria Fir Naa Joooneee Aaya Jin Eh gaaya.

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?showtopic=14756 This will also interest you! As for what tells me that it isn't according to Gurmat, i will write a short article in the future. Until then, please wait or read it yourself with open mind.

I got the info from Guru, Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji. Guru Ji says: Mahaa Maa-ee Kee Pooajaa Kray, Aaavai Jaavay Junmay Mray.

Please refrain from using the word Singh with names of these evil predators. Badal group is full of drug dealers so what else is expected???????

Then people wonder why sants get picked on. Can you even do aarth of Chandi // or u just a sheep type person meaning followers. If not believing in Chandi means hell, i acept even though hell isn't according Gurmat.

Waheguru Waheguru Waheguru Waheguru Waheguru! Akaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllllllllllll!!!!!

Bhenji, you think if it it right or wrong. You will be clear. This story is written to promote that Sikhs are a sect of hindus and are belivers of hinud gods and godesses. Don't think brahmans are dumb. They are the smartest of people on the planet. They used these stories to fool Sikhs during the late 18th century and all the way up till now because our ancestors were busy fighting for survival so when they were out. They didn't have time to see what was according to Gurmat and what wasn't. Remember statues were also placed in Darbar Sahib complex. There were a couple reasons for that. 1. Udasis and Mahants were from Hindu background and had faith in them. 2. Sikhs were in jungles so they needed money so they used statues to get Hindus to come to Darbar Sahib so they can get money and other resources.

Pronounce it mhlw not mihlw or mh`lw mihlw means wife. Do not add uddak or sihaaree to the word. Read it as we would read ghlw If you can't figue out the words like ghla and mhlw, copy paste them into word and use any GurAkhar font.

@ Do u mean bowing down touching feet?, or u bow down like u would to Guru Granth Sahib Ji???? too toucht their feet.... lol its completely different wen bowin down to guru granth sahib ji Bowing dows is wrong to anyone except Guru Sahib Ji. Bhurm Bhaikh Tay Rhae Niaara So Khals SatGuru Hamaraa Khalsa Mero Roop Hai Khaas Khalsay Meh Ho Karo Nivaas Was Khalsa made to bow down to everyone??? Guru Ji said Pooja Akaal Ki Parcha Shabad Daa Deedaar Khalsay Kaa Langar Guru Ka I don't see Sant baba in there??? Does anyone else??? Every Khalsa is a Sant. No need to have special labels. Labels only used to promote ego and inequality. Both are against the Sikh religion. There are a lot of other parcharaks who bring people into SIkhi from Missionaries, Akj, SGPC and others. They don't get labelled Sants. Why???? Only those who want to be called Sant get called Sant. No one labelled Giani Ditt Singh because he knew Gurmat and didn't want to be. No one has done more parchaar than him. Prof. Gurmukh Singh never got labelled Sant. Bhai Khaan Singh Nabha never got labelled Sant. Who did more than Bhai Kaan SIngh Nabha??? No one. Bhai Veer Singh never got labelled Sant. Bhai Taru Singh never got labelled Sant. I can go on with the list but no need to as the point is made. If you use your brain, then you would understand. As for Namastang, he just tries to put down anyone who doesn't agree with his snaatanee views.

what?isnt it written by guru gobind singh ji?? a chardi kala gursikh told me that it was about guru ji's life (b4 the one we know of)...i myself dont know too much but i do know that it is to be used for wars to get bir rus, i didnt think this wud b a surprise to anyone...im shocked actually...maybe i understood u wrong?? Chandi Di Vaar is about Kings (hindu gods) losing their raaj to demons and then going to durgaa for help. Durga wins them the raaj back, then they lose it again. Then they fight again and try to win it back so they go to durgaa again. Durgaa wins it for them again and gives the Kingship to Inder. It is basically praise of Durgaa and her manifestations such as kali and stuff. You know how hindus say Vishu had 24 avtar and stuff. Same way, Durgaa has 10. Kali, durgaa, paarbatee, siva, etc. Don't mistake siva for shiv.

Chandi di // is a translation from bhagwat puran. Nothing more, nothing less. Would you do paath of bible or Kuran translation??? If no then why do we cry when hindus say we are a sect of hindus??? Hypocrites??? As for Bir Russ, why couldn't the durgaa followers read it and get Bir Russ?? What are dhadi vars for if chandi gives Bir Russ??? To hide a mistake, don't make more mistakes. As long as Chandi // is considered Gurbani, jinnaa mujee joar laa lavo, Khalistan Nahee Bunnaa.

Oh nooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!! That thing spins!

I advice you to do the same veer ji. Bhainji, those that have and know. I will take that advice for sure. No worries but the great Gurmukhs who spent 24/7 of their life on Gurbani say it. Yes, I will do so. For now, I rely on aarths done by Prof. Sahib Singh as they are accepted by Akaal Takht as the teekah to use. I do try to do aarths when I have time but mostly Prof. Sahib Singh ones are the best there is. I don't follow the aarths that he does blindly. If it looks like he made a mistake, I go over. Gurbani is deep but understandable. Time has to be spent. No offence but not sure that a lot of the chelas who show up here have spent any time on it. I also request a sadh chela to do Shud Gurbani paath. Load a clip.

What a tool. Don't compare some derawala to Guru Sahib. Guru Ji never built any deras and Guru Ji did kirat kmaa-ee. Shows that you never read Gurbani and don't understand Sikhi. Vehlay Nikkumay Ageyani, Guru Nanak Day Pyare Hoa ga-ee Tay Kirat Kmaa-ee kurn walay, Guru Dee Sikheyaa Tay Chullan walay Nindak, Pakhandi, Paapi. 1880 to pehla kehree sant mandali see?? Zhooth toofaan toalee jaana. Tuhadi Dayray Waleyaa Dee Zindagi Hee Zhooth tay buneee hai purr Koorh Nikhuttay Naanka Orakh Such Rahee!

Is one of them implementiing and promoting AKaal Takht maryada??

You label people fussar panthi (patdon the language), katarpanthi, etc. That is wrong. Also, you have so much hatred for Guru Ka Sikhs who follow proper rehat.

Kirpaa Kurkay saaree Gurbani noo aatha smait soach vichaar kay paro. Please read all of Gurbani with aarths while comtemplatiing on each shabad and before that get some training on how to read and understand Gurbani.

Care to explain that comment? Bhai tool oh huundaa jehdaa jo mun wich aavay boalee jaavai. Soach samaj too binna bolan wala.

This shabad is about Guru and Prabh. To use it to fool people into bowing to ur derawala is mahapaap equal to that of masands and meenas, andd dheermulleas, etc. You tools have ruined the Panth.

Well, dayray walay are faridkoat wala teekah which gives brahmanee rangat to the teekah instead of Gurmat rangat. It is not mention of devtai and devis, it is how they are mentioned.

haha! Bhai aarth paro aarth. Dayray waleaa day keetay nahee, Gurmukha day keetay. E.g. Prof. Sahib Singh. You will be clear. As for eka maa-ee jugat viaa-ee, do a search on this site here in an old thread. http://www.sikhmarg.com/2005/0313-aeka-mai.html

This is very very sad. Take action else he will prey on someone else.