Jump to content

Saffron Terror


anush
 Share

Recommended Posts

Rahul Gandhi Khan is saying this for the first time on the Indian platform as the voice of Gandhi family - Evidences of this exist 1000 years back when Buddhists were massacred in India, 1984 massacre is not so old, when Rahul Gandhi Khan's pops Rajeev Gandhi Khan ordered the massacre of innocent Sikhs, and his grandmother Indira Gandhi Khan did no less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

those were the days when there was no 'hindu' dharam, it was empire against empire or kingdom against kingdom, this wasnt a organised war.

why i say this is , if the hindus who number 100 crore today, were also in good numbers then too, had they this capacity the mughals wouldnt have ruled hindustan for 1000 years nor would have the british dreamt to set foot on the indian soil .

The allegation that the hindus are planning to wipe out the panth cannot be agreed since if the hindus were that strong or wanting to do this they wouldnt have even allowed the panth to ever exist.

today we may blame some kings for wiping out buddhism, however if you read history you will understand that what happened was a boon in disguise.

those were the times when this entire country was like 80% buddhist, had this percentage not decreased you and me wouldnt have been what we are today, the reason being the islamic invasion took place and they not only finished buddhist kingdoms, they converted them to islam. Afghanistan is big example, similiarly south east asia too.

indira gandhi khan and rahul khan have been not only anti sikh they have been anti hindu too, the hindus too dont like them much.

there are apne in congress too, i dont know when will apne learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

those were the times when this entire country was like 80% buddhist
Please provide reliable sources. This is something I've read/heard first time about India. I agree Buddhists were in huge numbers before the coming of Islam, but 80% is a number mentioned nowhere in history written even by non-Indians. Please elaborate and clarify where you got this information from.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its true that after Asoka converted to Buddhism majority of hindus converted to Buddhism, But afterwards they were reconverted into hinduism forcibly saying that Buddhism preaches non violence and peace and lacks the warrior instinct.

Only nations to the northeast of India+Myanmaar+tibet+Sri Lanka were spared.

Those in North west were taken care by Mughals. You can still see the Buddhist style houses(like in Ladakh) in NWFP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.janataparty.org/soniainindia.html something i found about sohnia gandi on a hindu politician's website.

anush u are correct , his true religion is unknown, he has himself at times claimed to be a christian, i have heard that his academic records display that. shall send more link

mehtab singh veer ji, i shall get resources soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DesiKhaarkoo - You are correct there didn't used to exist a term "Hindu" 1000 years ago - Infact, this word means something very derogatory and shameful in Arabian/Persian. However, without going into details of all this, go through this link

http://superhindus.wordpress.com/how-brahmins-killed-buddhism-in-india/

More about the above history, you can find on http://www.ambedkar.org, who himself a Hindu got so embarrased after researching all this, that he finally deided to get converted to Buddhism as Mohandas Karamchand forced not to become a Sikh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Definitely the Guru Sahibs would be a heavier Scriptures to handle. Dasam Granth is more towards Bir Rass, Guru Gobind Singh showed his Greatness (of course, they would never say this) by separating his own Baania.  And the BIGGEST test of all?? Do we try and read Dasam Granth, Understand n show respect like we do to SGGS? Or... Do we QUESTION it? Guru Gobind Singh Ji is testing us. 
    • My wife will be going for an MRI scan next week but her Kara won’t physically come off.  Is there any way the mri scan can be done with the Kara still on?  The alternative is we will have to try to saw it off before the scan.  
    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use