Jump to content

Slogans raised against Vedanti


nonihal singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Amritsar, August 11. Unsavoury situation was witnessed outside the Akal Takht secretariat when slogans like “Jathedar Akal Takht murdabad” were openly raised here today. This is for the first time in the Sikh history that anybody raised such slogans in full public view.

Earlier, two persons, including a senior official of Damdami Taksal, entered in a hot wordy duel with Jathedar Vedanti outside the Akal Takht secretariat. Mr Prithipal Singh Sandhu, personal assistant to the Jathedar, Akal Takht, alleged that Bhai Amrik Singh, senior functionary of Damdami Taksal, and Mr Bhupinder Singh allegedly used derogatory remarks against Jathedar Vedanti.

Talking to TNS, Jathedar Vedanti said strict action would be taken against the persons who created ruckus outside the Akal Takht secretariat. Apart from summoning them to Akal Takht, the Jathedar, Akal Takht, is contemplating to write to Damdami Taksal for taking action against Bhai Amrik Singh.

The Jathedar, Akal Takht, had fixed August 11 to deliver his decision to resolve the controversy over the placing of Guru Granth Sahib in a mosque of Gadli village which was later converted into a gurdwara after Partition of the country. While a group of villagers had lodged a complaint against the caretakers of the mosque-cum-gurdwara and sought the removal of Guru Granth Sahib as per Sikh Maryada, the other group was adamant to keep Guru Granth Sahib there. However, a day before the final hearing which was fixed for today, the complainants had allegedly reached Gadli village for removing Guru Granth Sahib and placing the same at a gurdwara. However, the police was called in the village to defuse the situation.

This irked Jath

edar Vedanti who refused to meet the complainants. Jathedar Vedanti asked both Bhai Amrik Singh and Mr Bhupinder Singh as to why they entered in confrontation with the opposite party when directive in this regard was to be delivered today. On this Bhai Amrik Singh and Mr Bhupinder Singh alleged that the Jathedar, Akal Takht, had been conniving with the opposite party.

Meanwhile, in his directive, Jathedar Vedanti directed Mr Veer Singh to remove Guru Granth Sahib from the controversial place and keep the same at the adjoining gurdwara till a proper building was constructed. He has also directed him to shift the ‘Nishan Sahib’ pitched in the memory of the assassins of Gen A.S.Vaidya, Harjinder Singh Jinda and Sukha, inside the gurdwara complex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use