Jump to content

A Rebuttal For A Diabolical Troll.


Recommended Posts

Recently whilst traversing the infinite scope of the worldwide web I encountered a diabolical troll of ******* faith who was substituting the Damdami Bir with the Kartarpuri Bir. Of course hes aware of what he is doing but because ***** requires fallacious excuses for conversion he sails ever ahead. Sending him a rebuttal only allows him to heavily edit it and proclaim his own superiority. But let us look at some historical facts in light of his missing intelligence.

http://tisarpanth.blogspot.co.nz/2013/08/the-bhai-hardas-manuscript.html

http://tisarpanth.blogspot.co.nz/2013/07/giani-gian-singh-nirmalas-gian.html

I apologise for not being able to post the full articles on the forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you would be talking about this sunni posing as a fake sikh convert to islam
http://www.islam-sikhism.info/hist/kartarpuri01.htm

https://twitter.com/IslamSikhism

http://www.youtube.com/user/IslamSikhism/videos

https://www.facebook.com/Islam.Sikhism

http://www.paltalk.com/people/users/Islam-Sikhism/index.wmt


No matter what legitimate argument you give him, he doesn't listen or he deletes it. Similarly when christians make websites dealing with islam muslims steal the entire format of the website and give answers plus preach. It requires sewa to go through his arguments and destroy them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been banned on this lunnies fb page he also private messaged me insults about sikhi.

This is the guy who runs the page

553425_379860808757207_1383662066_n.jpg

here is his fb profile: https://www.facebook.com/abdurrahimabuadeebah

Such as the following:

"

Abu Adeeba

Let's have a look at the Mina sect and the many fakes Gurus like Miharban who so successfully faked your so-called Holy Book.

Easy mate

"

"Abu Adeeba

Dunno, lets see how many wives Gobind Singh had? Oh he had at least two that we ran around with when being chased all over the show"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way I think we should leave his website on, it provides good humor plus gives us a good excuse to expose Islam on a good day. What say you???? It is already evident that he is copying and editing prior arguments answered by us. But as their Koran says, "what a strange matter indeed."



Heres another id, these guys the same or related via incest???

https://www.facebook.com/abu.adeeba?fref=ts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you would be talking about this sunni posing as a fake sikh convert to islam

http://www.islam-sikhism.info/hist/kartarpuri01.htm

https://twitter.com/IslamSikhism

http://www.youtube.com/user/IslamSikhism/videos

https://www.facebook.com/Islam.Sikhism

http://www.paltalk.com/people/users/Islam-Sikhism/index.wmt

No matter what legitimate argument you give him, he doesn't listen or he deletes it. Similarly when christians make websites dealing with islam muslims steal the entire format of the website and give answers plus preach. It requires sewa to go through his arguments and destroy them.

Seva like the Americans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys got an inferiority complex or something, edits all the rebuttals sent to him and then says he sticks firmly to the universal laws of debate. I am sure he means Islamic laws, the sword triumphs over all. I did check out his sources, hes extensively exaggerated them to to blowing point (no I am not labeling him as a terrorist), I have never come across Ratan Singh Bhangu stating that the Kartarpuri Bir was destroyed or abducted. Then he states that the Koran is extremely factual, lovely <banned word filter activated>.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

art,illustration,mythology-9788d1a52b83d

Look at the daughters of the pagan al-lah god muhammad worshipped, mo worshipped their offsprings in haddiths aswell they were called
al-lat al-uzza and manat

Some great archeological work is decoding the gods muhammad and his fools destroyed after worshipping, it's a great slap across mo's dead face that his work to destroy is being uncovered.

uzza-nemc3a9sis-allat-manat.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use