HeatSikhingMissile

Embarrassing http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/apr/22/indian-film-nanak-shah-fakir-cancelled-mass-sikh-protest

Think of it this way, if you had a white coworker on the phone with another person being aggressive and having a 'white' name, and your coworker said "I don't like your language, especially coming from another white person", and you others overheard it, could it be seen as being racially exclusionary? The employer has every right to treat this matter equally for everyone, you were wrong to start preaching to the customer just because his birth religion so happens to be the same as the one you're practicing.

Two wrongs don't make a right, is there a better way to resolve these things before resorting too the last resort? (as dictated IN OUR RELIGION!), absolutely, even if the right-wing SS send this little chumchoo to get some beatings, how do we end up looking to the rest of the world? They still succeed, these Singhs come off looking like a *EDITED*

Whatabout Singhs who dye their beards? And how exactly do they plan to police this?

The Kaum has truly lost the plot, this is senseless bullying and goes against every principle.

Jaspreet, after reading your lunatic rants in this thread, it's clear you have issues, go spend some time learning about Sikhi and not being an internet tough guy, you seem to have the mental capacity of a 5 year old having a temper tantrum. Grow up.

Oh look, another keyboard warrior, safe to mock people behind a monitor isn't it? Regardless of your psuedo-insults, I have defended my dastar against thugs (more than one so I was outnumbered) without use of a weapon, let alone one that could result in manslaughter, had the thugs been armed, then it's more than appropriate to defend yourself through any means neccessary, this however was inappropriate use.

Inappropriate use, the others were not armed, this was cowardly.

In your eyes? Have you ever seen me? Quite the bold claim, explain how I'm a "secular fanatic"? If you're going to throw around accusations and your opinions, back them up or you sound like a complete coward.

LOL, oh, I wasn't sitting around waiting, but knew it was coming....and alas... http://www.indiawest.com/news/15419-gap-ad-campaign-highly-sexualized--says-sikh-activist.html GAP Ad Campaign 'Highly Sexualized', Says Sikh Activist A Sikh activist is organizing a Dec. 5 rally in front of the GAP Store in Davis, Calif., to protest a new ad featuring jeweler Waris Ahluwalia and Quentin Jones that he believes is disrespectful to the Sikh community. GAP’s holiday season print ad campaign, “Make Love,” which is focused on giving and sharing love, according to a statement by the retail clothing giant, features several icons, including singers Harry Belafonte, Tony Bennett and glam-queen Cyndi Lauper. Ahluwalia – of The House of Waris – and Jones are featured in one of the print ads, with the turbaned and bearded Indian American focused at the camera, as a waspy, bed-headed Jones has a hand on his dastaar and another on his open-necked shirt, which sprouts a bit of chest hair. Read more at http://www.indiawest.com/news/15419-gap-ad-campaign-highly-sexualized--says-sikh-activist.html#eW4E2iitOCI1UC7x.99

Grew up with Christmas trees, sang Christmas carols in school concerts, gave gifts etc. Yet, here I stand still a Sikh, people need to chill out.

Just waiting for the angry frustrated "Singh" to post about how "he shouldn't be modelling and is doing beadbi by having such a big ego and being into fashion blah blah blah", because knowing this board, sadly, it's only a matter of time. Good on Gap.

Are you serious? I'm starting to think "SinghBJ" is a troll. That or someone who is seriously disturbed (and pees in pools maybe?)

What's ridiculous is that some men find this ridiculous.

Sadly I've read a lot of dumb and completely baseless things on this board, but congrats Big_Tera, your post has sky rocketed right to the top of the list.