DalbirSingh

guru is everywhere no matter how we dress besides people dress to impress, why not dress to impress guru too

Well it sounds like speculation whenever you deal with any miracle in the world a supernatural act or event, the very laws of physics and sciences halt. So proving a supernatural event becomes impossible in that case. Even if we gave accounts from parties who observed such act, your agnostic friend could say they were delusional or are lying or were backwards people with very little understanding of science or superstition, for them it makes more sense someone is mistaken in the observation they made and recorded then a big law of science being halt (abit like pigs flying). As for agnostics ask them why they don't confess to actually being atheists, what keeps them in that limbo? Besides most early agnostics used the term to hide from christian social oppression while in heart were atheists.

Was that goori singhni the gullible type? Or punjabi singhni the baba nand singh - bulleh shah propoganda all dharams are one brainwashed type?

I guess they probably weighed the islamist problem of an invasion against khalistan, the buffer state would have been too small and could have paid even more dearly. The buffer state could unite 2 enemies against 1 muslims and hindus against sikhs.

No Palar, pinds or small villages can be populated by a family in some circumstances most humans are related anyway as long as your family relation is not within 6 links it's okay, it seems you aren't related and things are fine. The problem with cousin marriage is genetic diseases which stay within the same gene, if your relations are far away it doesn't matter, this isn't incest.

Atheism is like hinduism it doesn't have any formal definition hence you can make anything of it, there are loads of atheists who are good people from their own will to do good to their human being perhaps based around empathy. Islam is extremely dangerous, it gives justification to evil cruel acts in a twisted manner, jihad according to the haddiths is mandatory and must be for the propagation of islam, jihad is strategic enough to enslave all of humanity with the use of military might including swords and political seduction with the use of propoganda and lies, the totalitarian elements of it are extremely dangerous. I think an atheist is more wiser than a fully convicted muslim who accepts islam on their own. Well you can control islam if you become a mullah only trouble is when you do things without backing the other mullahs will jihad you down. The only thing that leaves sikhi behind christianity imo is scholarships, bishops have phds our greatest gianis study on the floor in a pind, with a slate, until they come over here and try and get their visa so they can break out of the family profession perhaps by turning their kids into builders or singers. We don't invest enough into the intellectual study of our religion, our libraries and the number of real gianis we have, we should be sending our gianis to teach gora about philisophy and religion, you can see molvis picking up this trend and teaching christian professors about biblical aramic, our gianis aren't experts of etymology.

In guru nanak's time people saw and questioned guru ji he responded gave them all the answers yet some didn't accept guru ji. Even in todays time we can stand and hear the truth yet we aren't always there to accept it. The truth can stare a person in the truth and they can be in self denial of it. Call it delusion if you must, but it is what it is, we are the progeny of the gurus and we are supposed to live their message, yet we live it in duality. Sikhi is sach da mazil, it is the state of truth, as gurbani says people will be judged by their karam, actions. Guru jis path is of sacha dharam, true righteousness other philosophies and paths are kachi bani, those ideas people follow in line with sikhi will erase their bad karam and give good karam through dharam. We have the revealed truth in front of us, others have the discover it from the har mander of the world. Sikhi is the ultimate dharam of ancient times which was lost, so other dharams seem to be constructed upon fragments of it.

Guru Sahib in his own ithais would be on the side of those who shared a common goal, like when it came to over throwing aurangzeb to put bahadur shah zafar on the throne of india considering him to be more tolerant, guru sahib sent singhs to fight for him, in a war people do get shaheed and guru sahib was given much rewards by bahadur shah zafar until he changed his tune and attacked the sikhs. What history teaches us is we should stand for truth so what if a few people who stand between truth and other things, we should stand with them when they are in the moment of truth.

I think in what you said you already made your mind up you are going to wear it. All I can say is get some nice material, get your style to suit you.

Mr lowe what a fake name sounds some sullah couldn't take his name in the news. Sad how the claims downplayed them to think the age of the victim was 18 or above, sullah are utter liars.

If everyone mixes blue eyes aren't going to exist, the gene for blue eyes is a recessive gene, while browinish eyes like we have are a dominant gene some scientists believe they occurred in a population during a time of low population to increase procreation amongst the populations. Some blue eye fellows who are aware try then to avoid such partners, besides you will always have contact lenses to fake the colour plus hair dye to change hair colour. Our descendents will be different to us, let's hope they are better. As for sikh girls leaving it could be better for us, those with weak faith leave and those with strong stay, the strong flock together even more tightly. I don't think we should compare ourselves to muslims they have a zealous reputation and one of the worst in the news, besides just look at them they are such a huge population and are afraid of jews who happen to be a smaller population then us. As for marrying into tamils or hindus alot of them are tolerant with religion and they wouldn't mind if it was the other way where a sikh guy married a tamil girl if it was a muslim this would equal honour killings. I think it's too difficult to make the passing generations females love sikhi but when you have daughters you will have a better chance at that, besides the polish are tolerant with teaching their kids sikhi. If your spouse doesn't convert it's not the end of the world you got your kids to at least have them respect your beliefs. As for being number 2 after christianity in the uk. Christianity is dying as is hinduism in europe and atheism and islam are growing.

I think the only thing that can be done is sikh men marry out aswell, there loads of polish women who love sikh men, some goris do the muslim girls are too much hassle they will try convert you or get their family on you. Otherwise there are going to be alot of men unmarried our population is going to be disturbed by the looks of things, some guys seem to be importing wives in the diaspora but it's only going to change things from the country of import be it india or somewhere else. Maybe the reason why so many people create these threads is because we have people who spend too much time on the internet and think they can't get a wife or partner yet when they try they are so out of practice with talking to the opposite gender that they repulse them regardless of religion, other races are probably more nicer simply because they don't want to be labelled as racists and want to better relations between races. Men are surplus in punjabi sikhs and women are surplus by the polish problem solved we mix. Let the women convert to islam and wear burkas they are backwards, plus they will probably be the downfall of islam some time in the future.

Friendships are created upon common bonds, for some people the dastar is the mid point they won't associate with you and some will after you wear it. The kind of friends you have also says something about you in society, some people are stringent in their dislike for sikhi saroop and you just got to live with that. Also sometimes you got to distinguish between that form of discrimination and dislike for your own personality or something else you do or don't do. You can't have it all, so you really got to do it for yourself and no one else.

So you are bisexual how does that work you are sexually attracted to women, like mentally does that get confusing?

It depends what careers you want to enter like if it's acting or modeling you have less chance as a turbaned sikh or in sports if you want to be a footballer, but it's still possible there is a small chance and there are underdogs in those industries who do take to the top. Life does regardlessly throw adversity at you. With or without a turban life is going to be hard anyway. If you want a job where you travel alot then airport's security checks can cause inconvenience to your mindset there are people in many industries who rigidly hate the sikh appearance. Some sikhs in great professions have great smarts and all of us have to accept sometimes for our self our own IQ and where we stand in a career aswell when it comes to equal competition you can be less favoured but it's life, you lose out on several social groups, friends, girls and so on. Sometimes it's not a great lose or you can find something better elsewhere. In the past sikhs had to prove their worth with their life for their faith. I don't want to make it sound sweet but it all comes down to you if you have what it takes to go through some social adversity for your faith, not everyone is cut out for it.

Water is called, water, h2o, pani, jal as well as: Czech: voda, vodní Danish: vand; vand- Dutch: water Estonian: vesi Finnish: vesi French: eau German: das Wasser, Wasser-… Greek: νερό Hungarian: víz Icelandic: vatn Indonesian: air Italian: acqua Latvian: ūdens Lithuanian: vanduo Norwegian: vann, vann- Polish: woda Portuguese (Brazil): água Portuguese (Portugal): água Slovak: voda Slovenian: voda Spanish: agua Swedish: vatten Turkish: su Tagalog: tubig But it's all the same thing, different names but it's the same thing. The personification of god in gurbani is the true manifest of him. Your second question requires deeper insight you might get some ideas by reading the following: http://www.searchsikhism.com/distinct.html http://www.searchsikhism.com/hinduism.html http://www.searchsikhism.com/hind11.html

Maybe it's okay they convert get the medications they want and leave their religion as an insult to them. But right now christians offer medication in india, i've seen some special dispensaries in india offered by hindu groups it appears the indian state of hindus seem to be more merciful than sikhs are on medication.

It seems people who are concerned with sikhs converting to islam, sikh girls eloping with muslim boy, underage sikh girls being victims of pedophilles who happen to be from a muslim background who then also engage in human trafficking of sikh girls, we tend to hear about it quite abit but it seems perhaps people want to do something about it, the government seems to be slightly low profiled about it due to the political sensitivity impact it can have. Plus tv channels, the news don't really care about sikhs as much as they care about the edl, when sikhs speak through the edl they get noticed by the media. So it could be a form of gathering attention. The edl don't appear to be a pure nazi party they might have nazi members or an undercover nazi agenda, but nazis in the past were haters of jews and didn't care much about muslims infact many nazis had alliances with muslims such as hitler and the mufti. Besides EDL don't seem to be condemning Israel.

the amrit of milk, the nectar of it is so great you can avoid it, it just means more for us. Besides taking this extreme side of vegan fanaticism based on pseudo science only gives those pro meat on the meat debate more credit. It seems people are not aware of what rikets are. http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Rickets/Pages/introduction.aspx Here is an article on the serious dangers of veganism http://naturalhygienesociety.org/diet3.html

http://networkedblogs.com/Nyeeu Royal Sikh Heiress Wins Battle over 3-Billion-Dollar Maharaja's Estate SHAILEE DOGRA After 23 years of legal battle, at last the daughters of the erstwhile Maharaja of the Sikh Kingdom of Faridkot, Harinder Singh, will inherit his huge property, as the court ruled that the will entitling a trust as its caretaker was forged. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajnish Kumar Sharma, pronounced the order on Thursday, July 25, 2013, based on a petition from Amrit Kaur, eldest daughter of Maharaja Harinder Singh, challenge to the will. The ruling declaring the will “forged and fabricated” brings Amrit Kaur and her sister, Deepinder Kaur, the estate and assets worth Rs. 20,000 crore [equivalent to over US$ 3.33 billion]. The court declared that the will forged on June 1, 1982, was “illegal and void”, and with the order, the trust had also become “illegal”. Of the Maharaja’s three daughters, Amrit Kaur settled in Sector 10, Chandigarh; Deepinder Kaur moved to Kolkata, and Maheepinder Kaur died some years ago in Shimla under mysterious circumstances. In 1981, when the will was forged, the ruler was in depression because of the death of Tikka Harmohinder Singh, his only son. On June 1, 1982, his servants, in connivance with some unscrupulous people and lawyers, forged the will, and the family -- including the Maharaja’s wife and mother (alive then) -- remained unaware of the creation of the forged document. Executed after about eight months of Tikka’s death, the will raised Meharwal Khewaji Trust and made all the Maharaja’s servants and lawyers, besides some other people, trustees. The younger daughter, Deepinder Kaur, was appointed trust chairman on the meagre salary of Rs. 1,200 a month (US $ 20); and Maheepinder Kaur was appointed vice-chairman and given a pay of Rs. 1,000 a month. The document divested Amrit Kaur of all powers of heiress, stating that she had married against the Maharaja’s wishes. The will came to light in 1989 after the erstwhile ruler’s death. In 1992, Amrit Kaur filed a suit that her father had never made any will and she had remained with him till his death. WILL’S SECRET When the will was forged, Raja Harinder Singh was in depression because of the death of his son. The will, if genuine, could only have been created under influence and pressure. The suspicion arose as the will purported that the Maharaja had excluded his wife, Narinder Kaur, as well as his mother, Mohinder Kaur, and appointed all employees, irrespective of class and designation, trustees. THE LONG BATTLE The 23-year-long fight for the royal inheritance could easily be among one of the longest battles in the legal history of this region. But the wait was worth it for the Maharaja’s daughter who had challenged the “will” entitling a trust as caretaker of the royal assets including forts, palatial houses, hundreds of acre of prime land, heritage jewelry, vintage cars and a hefty bank balance. At stake were properties worth a whopping US $ 3.33 billion which the Maharaja of Faridkot was allowed to keep after independence. GENESIS OF THE DISPUTE Maharaja Harinder Singh, crowned at the age of three in 1918, was the last ruler of the Faridkot estate and was married to Narinder Kaur. The royal couple had three daughters, Amrit Kaur, Deepinder Kaur and Maheepinder Kaur and one son, Tikka Harmohinder Singh. His son died in a road accident in 1981. WHO FILED THE CASE? Amrit Kaur, settled in Chandigarh, filed a civil suit in the local district court, challenging the will. Her contention was that her father could not have legally bequeathed his entire estate to the trust because it was ancestral property governed by the law. She also questioned the authenticity of the will with the following arguments: · The Maharaja was not in a fit state of mind and the alleged will was created under influence and pressure · Exclusion of his wife, Narinder Kaur and mother, Mohinder Kaur · Appointment of all the employees, irrespective of their class and designation, as trustees · Will is invalid, as one of the attesting witness, namely, Brijinder Singh Brar, is a beneficiary himself. WHAT WAS AT STAKE? The royal riches include heritage properties and prime land in four states (Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Haryana) and the union territory of Chandigarh. Here is a list of movable and immovable properties which the daughters have won back: Rajmahal, Faridkot: Spread over 14 acres, it was constructed in 1885 as the royal residence. Now, a 150-bed charitable hospital stands on a portion of palace grounds. Qila Mubarak, Faridkot: Built by Raja Mokulsi and reconstructed by Raja Hamir Singh around 1775, it is spread over 10 acres. The present main building was built around 1890. Faridkot House, New Delhi: Located on a huge piece of prime land on Copernicus Marg, it is currently leased to Central government at a monthly rent of Rs. 1.75 million. Valued at Rs. 12 billion nine years ago. Also, there is one more property in posh Diplomatic Enclave. Manimajra Fort, Chandigarh: Spread over spread four acres, it is at least 350-years-old. The city administration had planned to develop the fort as tourist destination. Decision deferred due to the legal battle. Faridkot House, Mashobra (Shimla): a 260 bigha estate, it had five residences, three of which, including the Sherwood House, were destroyed in a fire. 18 vintage cars: A 1929 model Royal Royce, 1929 model Graham, 1940 model Bentley, Jaguar, Damler, Packard among others and all of them in working condition. Aerodrome, Faridkot: Used by the civil administration and army, it is spread over 200 acres. Gold and jewels: Valued at Rs. 10 billion, these are in Standard Chartered Bank custody in Mumbai. THE JUDGEMENT Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajnish Kumar Sharma, ruled that the will making the trust owner of the property was forged. It has been declared “illegal and void”. WHAT NEXT The Chandigarh court judgment may be challenged in the higher court by the Meharwal Khewaji Trust, which has been the custodian of the Maharaja's properties/assets so far. However, Lalit Mohan Gupta, chief executive officer of the trust, declined to comment on the future course of action, saying he was yet to receive copy of the court order. [Courtesy: Hindustan Times. Edited for sikhchic.com] July 27, 2013

LOL what bullox loads of muslims remained in india without converting, there are more muslims in india then the whole population of pakistan. I think these poor sikh families must have been in need of medicine, sikhs don't provide free medications or some free medical facility as most other religions seem to be doing in india and the sikh gurus used to do the tradition has died amongst us.

I don't think you can quantify it, for some one meeting is enough for engagement in arranged marriages. I would say at least 6 months but it depends how much time you get to spend to actually know the person you might know them sooner or later, before you commit for life. Even a chaperoned date is still courtship if the girls parents sit in between or boys or mutual. I don't think people should jump straight into engagements it can be a mistake if you don't know the person well enough. Some people don't have the time, I think you should make some time before you commit your life away to a stranger, that goes for both guys and girls.

Show me where it doesn't say that? If you are going to give quotes on kaam please understand that's talking about lust, if you are going to give dasam bani where guru tegh bahadur says don't even go to a woman's bed in your dreams, you do realise courtship is not sex again. There is a difference between love, truly caring for someone and lust where you greed for their flesh in an animalistic fashion. But maybe you are right, Diya should first convert to sikhism read gurbani and get a good rishta, even though converts don't have it easy finding a rishta especially those who are going to be labelled as used goods. But maybe some glimmer of miracle will shine a true sikh will accept her.

Mehtab having a girlfriend or boyfriend doesn't automatically equal sex phornication out of wedlock is a kurheit, this might surprise you but you can court someone without actually getting in their pants. Having a cup of coffee regularly to get to know someone you consider life partner material isn't adultery. Infact what modern arranged marriage has become courtship of the old days. There is a difference between encouraging someone to get married when they are at that stage of life and need to take the first few steps to and between becoming promiscuous. Gurbani itself says Page 788, Line 11 ਧਨ ਪਿਰੁ ਏਹਿ ਨ ਆਖੀਅਨਿ ਬਹਨਿ ਇਕਠੇ ਹੋਇ ॥ धन पिरु एहि न आखीअनि बहनि इकठे होइ ॥ Ḏẖan pir ehi na ākẖī▫an bahan ikṯẖe ho▫e. They are not said to be husband and wife, who merely sit together. Guru Amar Das There are alot of decent people who meet their ideal partner who are good human beings through courtship. Sikhi doesn't encourage forced marriages either where you tie the knot between people who don't know each other or want to be with each other. The comparison between alcohol and dating is out of context mate taking poison and having companionship of someone you want to marry is something totally different. But mehtab perhaps you're right Diya should read gurbani go to gurdwara and get an arranged marriage to a good sikh family.

If it's her thing otherwise find a muslim boyfriend, a christian one, a jewish one, a parsi one, a hindu one, an atheist one, a chinese one, a buddhist one. Banda te banda honde. It's better to be really happy then follow a false sense of happiness where you enter religious extremism and go nuts. I'm not one for promoting baba nand singh's teaching of be a good x,y,z it can equate to be a good satanist or be a good atheist i'm more for be a good human