Jump to content

BhForce

Members
  • Posts

    2,879
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

Everything posted by BhForce

  1. The funny thing is male feminists who insist that a husband and wife are supposed to be exactly equal. If this is true, do you think it would be OK for a woman to work and the man to stay at home? Feminists would probably say yes (though they would never want to actually support a man), but no marriage would survive like that.
  2. ਕਿਆ ਮਾਗਉ ਕਿਆ ਕਹਿ ਸੁਣੀ ਮੈ ਦਰਸਨ ਭੂਖ ਪਿਆਸਿ ਜੀਉ ॥ What should I beg for? What should I say and hear? I am hungry and thirsty for the Blessed Vision of Your Darshan p762
  3. Thanks for that. The reason that Jagsaw thinks Muslims are just fine is that they are still a small minority in the UK. Let them become a larger minority and they'll be a bigger problem. Let them become a majority and they will muzzle his free speech and put a faceveil over his wife's face. Even in the UK, they were walking around with signs saying "Kill those who call Islam violent" with no sense of irony.
  4. What does that have to do with anything? It's like saying "Guru Arjan ji kept their hair (Sikh tradition)."
  5. Bad statement. You need to clarify that much more. It's one thing for a woman to be "equal" to some man in, say, competing for a job, if they can both do it. It's another for a man and woman married together to be "equal". What does that mean? If they have a major dispute, how do they decide? With a vote? There are 2 people voting. How's that? The girl leaves father's house to live with her husband at his father's house. The house is own by her father-in-law. That's patriarchy, not "equality". No, they are not. The bride follows the groom. A formula for endless fights, and then divorce. If you don't want to follow a man, don't get married. I'm not saying that you should not consult with each other on decisions. But on an issue where you cannot come to a decision, you have to have a way to make the decision or to defer. But if both think that they are "equal", they will keep arguing and fighting until they get divorced. I think this is meant to mean that the first person if necessary to go and fight is the man, then the woman because she will raise the kids (obviously the man will too). Not sure correct and forgive me I'm wrong. Facepalm. When a woman grabs a hold of a man's palla and follows behind him, that means they are "equal". Do tell what it means when a man comes to someone (say the Guru) and bows before him. Does that also mean they are "equal"? Drop the need to please the feminists, bro.
  6. Yes. This does not mean physical abuse, though.
  7. If you're talking about what color the bedsheets should be, who cares? Let your wife handle such issues. The point is, who is the head of the household? The man is.
  8. Yes. Obviously. That is, ideally. That's the entire reason the man is in front. The woman holds on to his palla, not the other way around. Grabbing a hold of someone's palla means that you attach yourself to him and he is responsible for you. Following behind him signifies that you see his as who you follow.
  9. Wow, this is amazing. I also hope the babas don't demolish this historic relic.
  10. So (question for the UK govt): It's only a problem when the far right views the ISIS manuals? It was always OK for Muslims to read that stuff, radicalize, go fight in Syria, come back with a welcome? Not that I have any love lost for anyone who wants to use violence.
  11. The gospels were written as eye witness accounts of Christ's ministry. Large parts of the new testament were by Paul who wrote letters to the newly formed churches to guide Christians. He was a fine learned scholar who spread the message of Christ. The Bible has tremendous power, written by authors guided by God himself and is the most published and read book in the history of the world. When there are things written in the Bible ascribed to Jesus, Sikhs may sometimes say that he didn't write the Bible. The point being that that softens any criticism of Jesus himself. That is, you're not saying Jesus is wrong. You're saying maybe Jesus didn't say that. It's a way out from criticizing Jesus.
  12. You know, you could write a few lines telling what the point of the video was so people can decide whether they want to take the time to view it.
  13. They "modernized" their faith to remove horrible things like slavery or weird things like no woman can address men in a church. We didn't have that problem in the first place. We don't have such negative aspects, so we don't need to "modernize" anything. As far as keeping hair, that's up to each individual. No one is going around snatching shavers out of people's hands.
  14. Then why are you asking? If it's just like choosing a brand of toothpaste, why even ask? Or, when you say you don't understand, does that mean that no one has told you why sex out of marriage is wrong, or people have and you reject that?
  15. Of course it's true. It's not like the translation was written by Guru Sahib. You should listen/view Youtube videos that have transliteration. Reading translations is actually kind of boring, since Gurbani is poetry meant to be experienced.
  16. Huh? The article says sangat told the sevaks to stop, but they said they will do anything "Baba ji" tells them to do. Stupid beyond belief.
  17. You did not directly refute my points, so I guess they stand. OK, I guess you have a point there. But do know that the New Testament doesn't call on people to kill non-Christians. The Koran does (non-Muslims).
  18. Have you ever read Gurbani, bro? Guru Sahib mentions other faiths all the time. And saying they are wrong. Sukhmani Sahib lists all the ways Hindus and Jains try to find mukti. And then refutes them. ਹਿੰਦੂ ਅੰਨ੍ਹਾ ਤੁਰਕੂ ਕਾਣਾ ॥ This entire shabad mentions many Hindu stories, and refutes them. Guru Nanak ji talks about the filthiness of Jains. There's another shabad talking about the pain endured by various figures worshipped by Hindus. Guru Arjan Dev ji and Bhagat Kabir ji talk about the futility of worshipping idols.
  19. No, bro, how could that possibly be? Islam came 700 years after Christianity, how could it possibly mention Islam?
  20. Who says it was his teaching? He didn't write the Bible.
  21. The fact is that some Sikhs have taken to saying what the poster above said (that Sikhs are not supposed to preach). It would be more accurate to say that the Sikhs prefer to tell people about Dharma (religious obligation) without regarding to religious specifics while also putting forth Sikhism as the best option. Then, people who are desiring to do so, can adopt Sikhism.
  22. Agreed. I mean, where do they think the current Sikhs came from? Sikhmart?
  23. So that's your first post? Why don't you make a list? Or do you know what the "firangi colonizers" changed but you don't want to reveal your hand?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use