Gill

to all the people who say he died in 84, i ask where you there when he died. so why do you think he is dead, cuz the gov't showed some pictures. have a little more faith. no that this proves anything, but a temple near my villiage reads a paticualar part in the granth sahib. they say they will stop, the day sant ji comes and hands out thag.

saddam's deserves to die, but bush isn't much better neither, ther're both greedy, responsible for the death of thousands of innocent people; bush tryed to liberate iraq, saddam tryed to liberate palestine. how can sikhs call the goi as terrorists and consider the US gov't a great gov't?

back to the topic, then why do they let people with piercings take amrit

wow, thats so sad, like almost every sikh women has pierced ears

could you please translate that, i'm not too good at reading punjabi

i was just wondering, sikhs aren't suppose to cut their hair because god made us like that so we are suppose to stay like that. what does it say about piercings, are't they againt sikhi, god didn't make us with holes in our ears. someone please educate me

sikhs should also pick up arms, they should defend and teach these cowards a lesson

oh, i see. i just got confused when you said "everyone else", i thought you weren't refering to me

the baba the came after baba nand and baba ishar singh ji, is his name baba jhora singh ji (sorry for the spelling)

i believe sant ji will be back, but won't people be mad that he left the golden temple when it was being attacked, will they accept him?

i'm just wondering wheather it says anything about gays, it looks like all these people are just assuming

GABROO KHALISTAN DAH, your viewing this all wrong, when the word terrorist was made, it was of course made to sound bad. i agree that a person(terrorist) shouldn't kill innocent people, but here in the west any one that opposes government can be classifed as a terrorist. some people see them as terrorists well others see them as freedom fighters. like i said earlier according to their definition bhai satwant singh and beant singh, bhai sukhdev and harjinder singh, and even sant bhindranwale are all terrorists. and if a sikh was to kill KPS Gill, he would be classifed as a terrorist. do i think terrorists are bad, no, but i agree the ones that kill innocent people are simple cowords. just remember government propaganda also exsists here in the west.

TheGuyDudeMan, which baba ishar were you talking about, the one in the 1960's

i was just wondering which one person can we blame for not geting our own state when india got it's independents

khalsacreazy, what is it that you disagree with, all i'm saying is the people who do serva, choose to do it

i also wish to be a extremist some day, and maybe even a terrorist, terrorist only has a bad name here in the west. it's better to be a extremist then a moderate

i see, that explains alot

yo buddy, what the hell are you talking about. this forum expands out of borders of the uk, and how do you know what each sikh thinks

oh, i see

could some one explain this to me

at the same time we must keep sikhi pure and not let these moderates try connecting sikhism and western society. i think change is going to hurt khalsa

little by little sikhi will rule the world B)

sikhs gotta start looking past these stupid politics and its definitions

probabably still in prison

in the video they said he surrendered