MisterrSingh

That's a perfect analogy. "Here, take my pocket money and my lunch, but please don't hit me. Are we friends, now?"

One of the funniest things I've heard in recent times is when someone said regarding the Rohingya issue: "How f*****g unbearable must a religion and its followers (Islam) be, that it forces BUDDHISTS to become militant in order to reassert themselves?" Lmao, the media only ever presents the results of the fightback, yet why do they never broach the reasons for why a group like the Buddhists had to resort to those means? And why is it only where there's a growing Muslim population in a country where they are a minority -- as they edge closer to that magic 10% population mark -- where these things happen? It's almost as if the response to Islamic encroachment arises because Muslims decide to instigate the next part of their plan once they've reached a certain demographical number where they feel they can "affect" matters in society... hmmmm....

This is a claim that's being picked up in recent times by Hindutva types, and they are debunking it with vigour. I've only ever heard this sentiment expressed by hyped-up parcharaks. It's misleading.

I need to cut out the Hob-Nobs.

^^^ I've never understood the sakhiyan of Muslims getting their prayers answered by attending Sikh Gurdwaras or visiting Sikh saints and mahapursh, yet not once has any Sikh told them to convert now that they've got their heart's desire; the very thing their "beloved" Islam failed to provide for them, that they had to enter the kaffir's domain to receive true spiritual blessings. No, our lot just send them happily on their way back into Islam's stifling embrace. Bunch of cucks we are.

Just a theory. Be open to all the possibilities. For those of us in the West it's a two-pronged struggle compared to India.

I agree with all of this, yet I must say I kind of understand the reservations expressed by the NSYF on the previous page. I personally don't think it's a RAW conspiracy, but I think certain white organisations who are under the radar and biding their time until the critical moment before acting themselves, MIGHT be involved. I'm not referring to the clown outfits and MI5-infiltrated EDL, Britain First. I think we might be used to gauge what the general reaction might be to a "soft" backlash against Muslims in the UK, specifically if they start attacking our Gurdwareh. It'll be Enoch Powell's prophetic words come true (he predicted that the immigrant population would import their old communal conflicts into this country). Depending on the subsequent media and public reaction (whether it's "Sikhs had no choice but to defend themselves" or "How dare Sikhs target those poor innocent Muslims"), an observing third party will then base their own actions around the general reception to our response. So, just be mindful of these games. There's a hell of a lot going on that not many understand. The game is complex and layered. It's dirty.

Do keep digging. Don't be afraid to expose yourself to ideas even if you don't agree with them. Your shardaa will never lead you down a blind alley.

You are dangerously naive. I'm actually worried what you'll do when you'll wake up one day in the future and realise how badly you've been mislead.

We need to stop constantly mentioning the shaheedi of the Sahibzaade, because it has a subtext of Islamphobia, and it will anger any visiting Muslims who need access to Gurdwara grounds at that particular time of the year.

Barkha Dutt. I've been keeping up lately. ? Are you an Arnaab Goswami kinda guy? ?

Recent (I'm talking the past 10 years or so) reassessment of Islamic encroachment into India, particularly from Western sources, has shifted to, "The Mughals did some great things for India and its people, too." It's like walking up to a Jew, and saying, "Stop crying about the Holocaust. The Nazis created Fanta, Volkswagen, and the Autobahn. Be a little grateful for their contributions!" Can you see history being gradually shifted to this point of view regarding Nazi Germany? No, me neither.

If anything, our Gurdwareh and Sikh organisations will double-down on the Islamic appeasement and virtue signalling. Things need to change quickly. Whenever some parcharak or giani starts chatting about "Musalman Bhai" in Maharaj's hazoori, someone needs to have the courage to stand up and say enough is enough. The international Sikh sangat's experience with Islam does NOT reflect the subcontinent / Indian republic's experience. Either wake up to the ground reality in countries across the world where Sikhs are settled, or unequivocally state that Sikhi only applies to what transpires in north India, because I can't relate to any of the stuff these obscenely wealthy superstar parcharaks have to say about the world the rest of us are forced to live in.

We frigged ourselves good and proper.

The political and cultural support (die Judenpresse) and goodwill will unfortunately reside with the other side if your theory comes true. "Love finds a way" remember? Apparently, only nuclear-armed countries with naval fleets, armed forces, and air forces can defend their interests. Anyone else who so much as tweets anything confrontational is straight for the gulag.

He's actually pretty good.

The "It's in the past. Move on" sentiment I've heard over the years is a classic symptom of what's being discussed above. I expect to hear it from a Hindu, because they don't want anyone dwelling on their crimes, but to hear it from a Sikh? It's a graphic reminder of how we were defeated; the true defeat, that of the mind.

Yes, I have to "warm myself up" before I tackle something hefty, else it just gets a bit too much. Plus, I re-read the Ramayana and skimmed through the Mahabharata again to remind myself of the principle deities and systems that's referenced in the BG. Going in cold is confusing.

Probably why I'm finding some solace in reading the Bhagwad Gita at the moment (as a philosophical exercise, not in devotion. Don't worry, I've not been brainwashed by the RSS, lol). The theory that duty and righteousness supercedes personal desire and partiality. Emotion-driven decision-making is the path to many pitfalls. Probably an ancient, earlier iteration of the Gurmat Vs Manmat dichotomy.

Seems a bit gay tbh.

It's difficult to define strength and weakness when it comes to the father and the masculine presence in the house. You could have a father who keeps his children on a short leash and disciplined, but then he could simultaneously be totally oblivious to the unspoken control that his wife exerts in the household, and how that affects much of his decision-making. In that instance, is he strong? Is he weak?

100% agree with all of that. Mainstream white women and NRI Sikh women (of our generation) are virtually indistinguishable in regards to mentality and demeanour. One-dimensional, crass, materialistic, and complete mental slaves to the prevailing orthodoxy of the mainstream dictated to them by the string-pullers on the television and the internet, lol. There are some white females who are world-wise and awake to the machinations of the world, but they are a tiny minority. Blacks and Muslimas of various cultures are a lot more tuned in to certain matters closer to what I would consider to be the truth once the curtain of bull-5hit has been pulled back. It's a chilled out, unpretentious, stress-free grounding that brings out the best in the man as well. My heart does sink when I think why apneean are severely deficient in this aspect of their thinking. Apneean's concept of rebellion is limited to rejecting their own culture after having been convinced of its irrelevance in the modern world, yet their cognitive faculties seem to develop a malfunction when they're unable to critically assess their adopted culture, and subsequently sift through its various aspects on its respective merits. Some apneean, thinking themselves as bravely breaking the mould, embrace popular foreign ideologies, swinging to the other extreme where they become footsoldiers of communism and far-left liberalism. They still exist within the borders of that paradigm, never thinking to transcend its limits to something better and different.