dasmesh_regiment

jamdoot, he delivered justice. it may have taken him years but he delivered it. and dyer himself died naturally soon after the massacre, so o'dwyer was the next natural target

sant ji has in his speech of may 1984 spoken against longowal - he says akalis are empty he accuses him of trying to kill him using sgpc members he also says that there are rumours that sukhdev babbar wants to kill him. he says its not true and he has only ever met him once

oh sorry.

at the end of the day, he did more than you or i

yet he is member of a party whose many members openly have said we wont let turbans stay on their (sikhs) heads he also said nothing to sajjan kumar and tytler how ironic

Hoshiarpur, April 6 Dr Jagjit Singh Chohan, a Khalistan ideologue, was cremated at the back of Chohan Charitable Clinic in Tanda, 32 km from here, today. Rupinder Singh, his adopted son, Jorawar Singh Chohan, his nephew, and Mukhtiar Singh, his brother-in-law, jointly lit the pyre. Hundreds of his admirers, supporters and associates, including various luminaries of the Sikh panth and SAD factions, attended the funeral. The body of Dr Chohan was brought to his residence at 8.30 am today to let people have the last glimpse of Dr Chohan. Jagmohan Singh Toni, Gurcharan Singh Lohara, both general secretaries of the SAD (Amritsar), Daljit Singh Bittu, senior vice-president of the SAD (Amritsar), Harcharanjit Singh Dhami and Kanwar Pal Singh Bittu, both senior leaders of the Dal Khalsa, and Bhai Ram Singh, carried placards with “Khalistan Zindabad” written on them in English.

having watched all videos i found some of kulbir's arguments rubbish he was far too forceful and not willing to listen, many of his points were based on stories which may or may not have historical backing - the same as ghagga yet he criticised him for it his points on guru arjan dev ji and guru nanak dev ji were right though but ghagga really knows his stuff historically and is actually whenever kulbir got blown out hes says ok lets drop it and moves onto something else kulbir always thinks his view is 100% Admin Note: We support Akal Takht and self-promoted guys like Ghagga/kala Afghana/Spokesman/Gurteja etc are doing a lot damage to our Panth. We support freedom of speech but we will not allow their vile views to spread out more by having discussions on their speech. Topic Closed

everyone knows chohan was dubious but at least he openly called for khalistan does aulakh sell us dollars for khalistan dollars??? never heard that one before. if he does he needs to be shot

ramu unfortunately it did happen but please read my post properly and respond accordingly

i dont think you understand my point "dasmesh regiment Jeeo - we can't analyze everything and provide answers for everything, either.. but maybe Waheguru Ji didn't want to give them a child, for whatever reason, so despite Sangat Ji's Ardaas, they were not given a child?" yes so ardas even WITH a true heart doesnt guarantee you what you ask for

Sikh militant leader Chauhan dies of heart attack at 80 The Associated Press Wednesday, April 4, 2007 Click here to find out more! AMRITSAR, India: Jagjit Singh Chauhan, a Sikh leader who led a violent separatist campaign in India's northern Punjab state, died Wednesday after suffering a heart attack. He was 80. A dentist by training, Chauhan was active in state politics and became a lawmaker in 1967. In 1970, he launched a campaign for a separate state called Khalistan, or Land of the Pure, for India's Sikh minority. Thousands were killed during the secessionist campaign for Khalistan. The insurrection was crushed in the early 1990s, but many rebels remain at large. At the peak of the separatist insurgency in the 1980s, Chauhan emigrated to the United Kingdom and opened embassies there and in some European countries representing Khalistan. He even issued passports and created a separate currency. He returned to India in 2001 and said he would continue to campaign for a homeland for his people, but renounced violence. Prime Minister Indira Gandhi angered the Sikh community by ordering an army raid in June 1984 on the religion's holiest shrine in the northern city of Amritsar to flush out Sikh militants. The move led to the assassination of Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards on Oct. 31, 1984. Chauhan died in the town of Tanda, 105 kilometers (65 miles) east of Amritsar.

i am an ardent follower of sant ji however it is common knowledge he was let down by the akalis he was not into politics as such but he never confessed to be into it everyone knows in our faith there is no seperation of church and government unless you are an akali!

akito, you blame it all on politics this is unacceptable politics played a big role however when innocent hindus were killed by "sikh militants" - this was a major cause in the movement slowing to a halt. this shows sikhs as a general majority had sympathy for hindus whilst when sikhs were killed on a mass scale, they then voted rajiv gandhi to the biggest single ever majority in an indian election - this was not due to emotive politics, this was due to racism on a mass scale people are not that easily misled - they need a deeprooted idea/cause/anger/hatred which is THEN exploited to go around and kill people and in reality when it comes down to it - the only thing which differed between sikhs in 1984 and tamils in 1989 (or whenever rajiv gandu was killed) was the fact that hindus did not want to kill other hindus- simple as why didnt hindu kill hindu when mahmata gandu was gunned down by rss man. why didnt rss get killed everywhere. dammit they became leaders of the county within 50 years

i am not doubting the fundamental concept of ardas i still think that kulbir's point was put to pot by a simple answer Singh132 wrote - There is no doubt that if a Gursikh does Ardaas and that ardaas has all the conditions met (true heart, full faith in Guru Sahib, not wishing harm on others, Sikh is trying to follow Sikhi honestly, etc.) it will be fulfilled. this echoes what kulbir was trying to say. however are you telling me that in the countless ardas vedanti tohra indeed any other sikh who may be childless or in another need, have done there was not ONE SINGLE sikh who met the above conditions? surely there was? yet im pretty sure those requests were not met

again i know old topic but ghagga blows out kulbir in 5/6 video at 10mins on the point of praying for children i am not commeting on any other viewpoints yet! http://www.panthic.org/news/123/ARTICLE/2816/2006-10-11.html

when a tamil killed rajiv gandu why did e.g. hindus from bombay not goto trivandrum and kill loads of hindu tamils = action reaction theory is blown away there face it overwhelming majority of hindus are racist against sikhs (not that i am not saying sikhs are not racist either) but the fact is that hindus didnt (in large numbers) react against killings of sikhs shows that they were complicit remember rajiv gandu after the death of his mother won the single biggest majority EVER by a prime minister of india - democracy never lies huh?!

why do we just target girls boys are far worse maybe you guys should go clubbing and see what us boys get up to

atinderpal singh's akali dal is more of a joke than mann's - it has no chance of doing anything he is a dubious character he lives in a very nice house

if hindus were not fundamentalist as a majority then why did they not try to prevent mass murder of sikhs on a large scale (only individual hindus helped sikhs in delhi and kanpur) why when rajiv gandu was killed by a hindu tamil did not tamils in south india be killed on a mass scale please answer the above questions

i cant believe some people believe sant ji will come back these people have damaged the struggle for too long i am sorry but baba ji said he would not pass away until sant ji came back - this has proved to be false both factions of the taksal (ram singh and harnam singh) accept sant ji is shaheed his own brother identified him his own son and wife have accepted it yet some cant - sit around and wait for him all you want

major sandhu

it is very likely goi killed those sikhs in kashmir kashmiri militants would gain nothing but bad publicity if they killed innocent sikhs

majority of hindus stood by and watched thousands of innocent sikhs get killed and do nothing and then they voted overwhelming for the mass murderers to be elected to government they havent dont anything wrong

some sikhs do drink blood go chill with some nihangs, after jatka on goat they mix the blood into the turry for the meat. no joke.

brahma chellaney is rather suspect. although he exposed the goi at first, i remember reading somewhere that he laterf backtracked in order to save his skin