jai_ho

watch this>>

Irrelevant question. Why? Because a country’s borders cannot be specifically predetermined until both parties sit down and negotiate a truce. The major consensus is that Khalistan will be the Punjab as it was in India in 1947. Borders of India, USA, Pakistan and many other countries were determined after their independence was announced. USA and Canada still have conflict over borders. I would like to know how India will give the Pakistani land to Sikhs? Once again, no country in the world drafted its constitution and setup the government until after independence. Economic policies, laws and regulations change over time. Only time will tell what kind of government will be setup but one thing for sure is that there will be democracy rather than dictatorship. Living in the western countries we know that privatization works better. We can follow the example of USA that control post office, military etc and rest is privatized. As is clear from Sikh history and principles that freedom of religion is allowed. Guru Sahib sacrificed his life for freedom of religion. Sikhs will never inflict the pain and sufferings they faced themselves. Halal meat and wine can only be allowed in the vicinity of mosque and not in public places. Regardless, Khalistan will survive. There are Sikhs living in many countries that have many restrictions on Sikhi. USA does not allow Kirpans. UAE does not allow hosting Nishaan Sahib. If Khalistan puts some restrictions then it doesn’t jeopardize its survival. You are looking for too much guarantee. Name one country in the world that is 100% peaceful and where no fights have occurred. However, during elections we can use police to ensure that no violence erupts. In my opinion, form of elections will be changed and each candidate will have to be educated, well qualified and experienced in order to run for election. Majority of the Punjab police had drunkards, corrupt and immoral people as its officials. Such people do not even deserve to be called human beings let alone Sikhs. In any case, Punjab police was offered money and rewards and more importantly given strict orders by the central government to hunt Sikhs and dishonor women. Will the Sikh government ever do that to its own people? Never. Consider some realistic examples: In Pakistan we have witnessed muslim on muslim violence, in India hindu on hindu violence etc. Are these countries surviving? Very well yes. As long as corruption has its root in the higher level (central government) it cannot be rooted out from lower level. Indian government is highly involved in Sikh politics and has puppets. When Sikhs come into power they will ensure that things are run as per the teachings of Guru Sahib. SGPC’s responsibility is to manage Gurdwaras not run Akal Takhat Sahib. So definitely it will be restricted to just that. At one time SGPC had honest and true Sikhs as leaders. Government can root out and root in the corruption. There are numerous examples in the world for us to look at. There are more than 40 landlocked countries in the world and some are doing better than India and Sri Lanka that have direct access to seaport. This question was answered in the Gupt Section. Refer to it. This question deals with ecology more than with Khalistan. If water flows naturally through Punjab, more water will precipitate and more rainfall in return turning the land into fertile. Also, pollution needs to be controlled so that more sunlight gets to the land and water. All the rivers originate from Himalayas. Himachal being part of Khalistan will be the first to get access. So I don’t think India will control the rivers. Even if it does, I hardly think it would want to have hostile nature towards another country especially considering freedom movements rising in other states, conflict with Pakistan and now china. Countries grow economically by having friendly relations. India might want to get electricity from these rivers but we can easily sell it in exchange for access to seaport. We are moving towards globalized economy rather than invading and taking over. Crushing a homeless community is much easier than invading a foreign country. You are talking on assumptions. I can, the same way, make positive assumptions and conclude that Khalistan will be first world country. Look at California, its major industry is Hollywood and amusement parks and both are man-made. Does every landlocked country have farming as its only industry? How about Greenland and Iceland? Surviving, aren’t they? We are in the age of science and technology. Why can’t we specialize in computers, software, clothing, sports, tourist attractions, medical etc. The list is endless. I would also like to see the proof that both countries will have animosity against us. I am pretty sure that both will be friendly and here is why: We will need access to seaport and we will have to negotiate with either India or Pakistan and give something back in return (electricity, food or anything else we may specialize in). This will increase the chances of two countries doing business and growing economically. The other country would want to be in on it in the hopes that the other country does not grow stronger. This will increase the competition and we may get better deals than expected. I prefer to use seaport of Pakistan and then shipping the cargo using trucks or trains. But we can get into the details when we get a country. Pakistan has been friendly to us as we share same culture and language. We share more similarities with Pakistani Punjabis than with Indian Hindus. Both Punjabs can work together and have better relations so that we (Sikhs) will have more access to have darshan of our Gurdwaras. At last, I would like to say that we all need to be realistic here. In order for us (Sikhs) to flourish and have a better country is not by discouraging each other by throwing questions but sitting together to come up with solutions. Every question has a solution but unfortunately many of the so-called “Sikhs” have chosen the path of standing against their brothers in an unsuccessive attempt of persuading them to stay slaves. Sikhs in the past have done impossible things and if we cannot even run one country then how can we expect to have Khalsa Raj all over the world? Building hong kong airport was an impossible feat. It is not only Sikhs’ but also human nature to make impossible possible. People with the attitude of “we will never get it” and “we will never make it” have already given up and in my opinion cannot ever be successful in this world. Positive attitude, faith in Guru Sahib, and will stronger than steel will make us better, and successful Sikhs enabling us to rule not only Khalistan but the entire world. Khalsa Shall Rule ...all i want to say is welldone )))) ...Switzerland is also a landlocked country & has the most strong economy in Europe

...people power is the greatest weapon and when peole are singhs with guru on their side then even mighty rivers give way :WW:

..dont forget the tamils in tamilnadu

..its not anti muslim ...moslims marry sikh girls to convert them, to take advantage, ..& about hindus i have not heard hindus converting sikh girls, targeting sikh school girls or other bad thing done by moslims (i believe Sikh should marry a Sikh)

a girl phoning on asian network radio..listn to it

.i'm student and have some experience in Java And XHTML if that helps????

..maybe i can help

thank u

..maybe you can come with a solution ...please read the topic i f you don't have anything conservative to say, why spoil the topic. ..you remind me of the politician in india , they themselves don’t do anything and they don’t let anyone else do any good

....i stopped writing any comment on this form because there was no progressive topic on seperate Sikh state. people just said how,why and when ..if every Sikh or maybe handful of Sikhs started to put their head down and think and do similar planning then we wouldn't be far from a free nation.. ..and i have heard many speeches by bhai bittu and he is good planner, but there is still need for a strong leader..(please dont come and start dasing me over this and ruin the topic) ..good work my friend and keep it up !!!!

watch this http://www.sikhsiyasat.com/misc/badal_story.html

there was a thread here few weeks back, there were numbers of links to different websites for audios of sikh jathas!!!!!!! (it may have been set up by a gurdwara shaib in canada or america ) if anybody has the link please let me know!!!

..he left not because he was made to leave#

..that buliding belongs to kumaryer community, and is owned by the gurdwara that is opposite side of it. ..it was the old gurdawara for kumaryers, but now they have bulit a new gurdwara, that is right opposite of the buliding

whn all siks became true khalsa there would be nothing standing against the sikhs.

..its the sikhs who need to be blamed, not any party. ...every human being has a mind

thats contraversial as this article points out: http://www.stephen-knapp.com/about_the_name_Hindu.htm Today Hindustani means indian!!!!!!!!!!!! Plus all those invading countries of the past are now all crap compared to mera pyaara Hindustan :nihungsmile: hindu means thief, in arabic i belive

thats contraversial as this article points out: http://www.stephen-knapp.com/about_the_name_Hindu.htm Today Hindustani means indian!!!!!!!!!!!! Plus all those invading countries of the past are now all crap compared to mera pyaara Hindustan :nihungsmile: hindu means thief, in arabic i belive

..only if sikhs are given more autonomy in india,a veto power in parliment :TH: ...world power?explain?

....y indra agrred to punjabi suba, because sikhs saved india from pakistan in 1971. ..the hindu solders were reportly ran into sugercan fields to hid ..i also belive that khalistan should be achevd through political means, for various resons ..but the indian army is only good at killing its on people. once khalistan is made india can have millions in the army they wont dare to sneeze (i belve the border with wont be guarded)

Maharaja Ranjit Singh was not only brave but a fine politician. I don’t thing anyone has matched his ability to this day.

....too funny :nihungsmile:

when u say khalistan flag, do u mean nishan shaib ???????

...u didn't understand anything i wrote, which bit ? :umm: ...and u r calling me a agent ? (u must work with RAW to know this top secret) Nooooo veeereh! I was talking about NIHAAAL. What the hell is he talking about? ..acha ji .. mano galti laag gai :e: