Ripudaman Singh Malik Sues Canadian And British Columbian Ags

[MahanMoorakh]

guaranteed that Kim Bolan will somehow try to twist this around and make Sikhs look bad.. once again... i bet she's jus droolin rite now tryin to figure out a way...

I too live in Canada and I think it's Great...and believe you me...Malik Sahib will most definetly take them to the cleaners (rightfully so). The Canadain government and it's legal system stole 2 years of his and Bhai Ajaib Singh Ji's life and painted them as mass murderers and terrorists. He should also sue the pants off some of the english and punjabi speaking media for their shamelerss tabloid style journalism. Most notably one Kim Bolan of the Vancouver Sun. I firmly believe that she along along with her counterpart Late Tara Hayar were (and in Bolan's case still are) on the Indian pay roll. The evidence against the accused was totally bogus...but if you read Kim Bolan's one sided coverage...everyone in th egenreal public thought teh two Singhs were responsible for the horrible blast without a doubt. Basically the two Singhs in the publics eye they were already guilty. You all have heard the saying Innocent until proven guilty...but not in this case. Due to so much false propoganda from the prosecution and the media (Kim Bolan) the Singhs were Guilty until proven Innocent. However let's not hold this against Canada. Canada is a great country...if not the best. Just Imagine if this trial were to happen in..gee i don't know... India. Just imagine what the result would have been.

[KHaNdA_NaTioN]

I think i heard about this on the radio too

[buddasingh]

I’ve really looked in to this over the past few years and I still remain convinced that they were not innocent But then nor was the Canadian intelligence service and the Canadian government. “Soft target” didn’t sway my mind the theory was good but lacking any real evidence.

So your verdict would be to find them "not innocent"? You're claim that you've "really looked into this" peaks my curiosity as to the basis for your conclusion? Please elaborate.

The question is no longer whether they were innocent or guilty? That's the fantasy the media want to drawn out as long as possible.

The necessary question is what and who were the forces responsible for bringing such a circus of evidence to trial where so many died and 2 men ultimately acquitted would be in jail and stand accused of such heinous crimes based on propped up witnesses, and manufactured banter.

Where are the criminal charges against those witnesses, investigators, and others responsible for the circus of the trial? Where is the investigation that could lead to those charges?

The additional question is where is the media's hysteria into why tapes were erased and what is really going on here? Why is there not a peep from the hysterical media champions when the evidence implores them to ask questions about the political influences of the authorities at the time? When the evidence implores them to demand answers as to why tapes were erased and what is really going on. When the evidence implores them to ask who is responsible for using lying witnesses to put two men behind bars for 5 years and who is responsible for playing on the trust and emotions of those who lost loved ones.

[Guest Dancing Warrior]

The intelligence service and Canadian government had too much to loose if the culprits were convicted. It is a well known fact that one of the collaborators was on the employ of the Canadian intelligence agency and was working as a double agent with Babbar Khalsa International. The evidence on the tapes confirmed this fact, why do you think they were deleted. It is a Fact that the Canadian Government blocked and objected to “the bomb theory” at all the trial hearings stating that it was structural failure that downed flight 182! at the exasperation of international specialists who clearly state that a bomb was responsible. It is a known fact security agents were not familiarised with how to use bomb detecting equipment even when one indicated a suspect baggage on the flight, it was not checked again the negligence of an employee contracted to the security service of the government.

The prosecution presented a pot holed case if the culprits were found guilty then so would the Canadian government.

[Guest Hardeep_S_Khalsa]

The GOI framed the BKI, they seen the BKI as a threat and decided to give them a bad name.

[buddasingh]

The intelligence service and Canadian government had too much to loose if the culprits were convicted. It is a well known fact that one of the collaborators was on the employ of the Canadian intelligence agency and was working as a double agent with Babbar Khalsa International. The evidence on the tapes confirmed this fact, why do you think they were deleted. It is a Fact that the Canadian Government blocked and objected to “the bomb theory” at all the trial hearings stating that it was structural failure that downed flight 182! at the exasperation of international specialists who clearly state that a bomb was responsible. It is a known fact security agents were not familiarised with how to use bomb detecting equipment even when one indicated a suspect baggage on the flight, it was not checked again the negligence of an employee contracted to the security service of the government.

The prosecution presented a pot holed case if the culprits were found guilty then so would the Canadian government.

I think you’ve innocently presented something completely illogical. Here’s what you say:

Your premise--

If accused guilty then government guilty.

If AG then GG

Your conclusion based on the premise--

It follows then that-- Government guilty therefore accused guilty.

GG, therefore AG

With respect, that's illogical.

It’s a 609 page judgment which is online somewhere. I’ve read it and I don’t recall anything about of the Canadian government objecting to the bomb theory. In fact the only dispute during the trial was the location of the bomb. Also what is the source of the “well known fact” that you state about a double agent with BKI?

I don’t doubt there were double agents in the BKI. But with respect to AI, I think close to absolutely nothing was revealed in the case.

If Canadian government and media really cared and wished to have answers, look at my earlier post in this thread. That’s how they can get answers, instead of saying “oh well, lets see what we could do better next time”. That sounds rather suspicious when there remain so many questions of so much of the intelligence community.

[Guest Dancing Warrior]

The intelligence service and Canadian government had too much to loose if the culprits were convicted. It is a well known fact that one of the collaborators was on the employ of the Canadian intelligence agency and was working as a double agent with Babbar Khalsa International. The evidence on the tapes confirmed this fact, why do you think they were deleted. It is a Fact that the Canadian Government blocked and objected to “the bomb theory” at all the trial hearings stating that it was structural failure that downed flight 182! at the exasperation of international specialists who clearly state that a bomb was responsible. It is a known fact security agents were not familiarised with how to use bomb detecting equipment even when one indicated a suspect baggage on the flight, it was not checked again the negligence of an employee contracted to the security service of the government.

The prosecution presented a pot holed case if the culprits were found guilty then so would the Canadian government.

I think you’ve innocently presented something completely illogical. Here’s what you say:

Your premise--

If accused guilty then government guilty.

If AG then GG

Your conclusion based on the premise--

It follows then that-- Government guilty therefore accused guilty.

GG, therefore AG

With respect, that's illogical.

It’s a 609 page judgment which is online somewhere. I’ve read it and I don’t recall anything about of the Canadian government objecting to the bomb theory. In fact the only dispute during the trial was the location of the bomb. Also what is the source of the “well known fact” that you state about a double agent with BKI?

I don’t doubt there were double agents in the BKI. But with respect to AI, I think close to absolutely nothing was revealed in the case.

If Canadian government and media really cared and wished to have answers, look at my earlier post in this thread. That’s how they can get answers, instead of saying “oh well, lets see what we could do better next time”. That sounds rather suspicious when there remain so many questions of so much of the intelligence community.

You claim the verdicts to be watertight . The Judge directed an acquittal that’s different to be found “not guilty” by a Jury.

You may want to verse yourself in the Judges closing “ frustrated statement”

You may also want to study Coroner Cornelius Riordan report 17/09/1985 Coroners Inquest location Cork, Ireland and the attempts by the Canadian government lawyer Ivan Whitehall’s attempts to block the “Bomb theory” from being disclosed in court.

You may also want to study the Kirpal Commission 22/01/1986 comments by Bernard Cagier a Canadian Aviation Safety Board officer.

When you have finished your analysis on the above I have plenty more for you to analyse