Jump to content

Inderjit Singh Reyat Has Completed His Sentence In Jail!


TeriSharan.
 Share

Recommended Posts

Its good news that Inderjit Singh Reyat has completed his sentence in jail, as he is innocent and unfortunately all the blame what put onto him!! May god bless him and his family!!

Inderjit Singh Reyat, the only person convicted for the 1985 Air India bombing, completed his manslaughter sentence but was not released as he is awaiting a fresh trial on perjury charge.

Reyat, 55, was escorted from Matsqui Institution in Abbotsford in Canada [images] to a Lower Mainland jail on Saturday to await his perjury trial, which is now scheduled in British Columbia Supreme Court for March 7. But Reyat is hoping to be released on bail.

Roger Cutler, of the attorney general's ministry, confirmed that Reyat has applied for bail, and March 4 has been fixed to hear that application.

"He was kept in a federal institution while completing his manslaughter sentence, which came to end. And then he still has to deal with the perjury matter and he is in custody while awaiting that. The (arrest) warrant would have been issued way back then," Cutler said.

Families of the Air India victims were contacted in January and told Reyat had agreed to plead guilty to perjury for lying at the trial of two others accused in the terrorism plot.

But Reyat appears to be intent on going to trial on the allegations he lied repeatedly in September 2003 when he was a Crown witness against Ajaib Singh Bagri and Ripudaman Singh Malik. Both men were later acquitted.

Lisa Lapointe, of BC Corrections, also confirmed the Reyat transfer, but said she couldn't release information about which pre-trial jail - Surrey or North Fraser - is now the temporary home of the bomb maker.

"We are not allowed to release that," Lapointe was quoted as saying by Vancouver Sun. "If his warrant expired with the federal government on Sunday and then there is a warrant of remand, then custody would go to provincial corrections on that date," she added.

Reyat pleaded guilty to manslaughter in February 2003 for aiding in the Air India bombing. He had also been convicted in 1991 for building a second bomb that exploded the same day at Tokyo's Narita Airport, killing two baggage handlers.

Both bombs were checked in at Vancouver International Airport and tagged for Air India flights heading in opposite directions around the globe.

In the perjury indictment against Reyat, issued in February 2006, the Crown alleged Reyat lied 27 times over five days of Air India trial testimony.

His alleged lies relate to his knowledge of the bombing plot, his relationship with plot mastermind Talwinder Singh Parmar and his claim he didn't know the identity of 'Mr X', the mystery terrorist who stayed with Reyat for several days in early June 1985 and to whom Reyat claimed he gave all the bomb components used to kill 331 people.

The indictment suggests Reyat worked closely with Mr. X on the bombs and the pair discussed the motive for the attack - the treatment of Sikhs in India.

http://www.rediff.com/news/2008/feb/10ai.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use