-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By dallysingh101 · Posted
You know this isn't true. If diasporan settlers created a bustling modern place, all the 'loyal to the pend' diasporans would come running to it. I think 'enclaves' (in lack of a better choice of words) would be inevitable. Plus I'm wondering, in the hypothetical situation. Would it cause many of us who grew up elsewhere to gravitate towards each other rather than the indigenous? -
Power politics is in the hands of the majority. Power is in the hand of the sword holder. -
It seems that some Sikhs are not reading up on their history. And that's a shame as this particular history is only around 80 years old. In 1944, H S Mailk also produced a map of Panjab and outlined it as a Sikh country, to the British. Muslims were asking for Pakistan, so why couldn't the Sikhs have their own country as well. Seems a fair argument. But the map Malik produced and presented to the British would have only showed a Sikh population of some 20%. The British asked him on what grounds would you claim this as a "Sikh" country? Both the other communities could outvote your community individually. Malik had no answer. Lesson learnt?
-
-
By dallysingh101 · Posted
So it's inevitable seeing as many people would land there with relative fortunes.
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.