Jump to content

Punjab Farmers Suffer Loss Of Rs. 62000 Crore


sikhizindabad
 Share

Recommended Posts

Punjab farmers suffer loss of Rs. 62000 crore printButton.png emailButton.png Punjab Newsline Network Tuesday, 01 September 2009 google_protectAndRun("ads_core.google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad);CHANDIGARH:A Committee on Minimum Support Price (MSP) & Price Index headed by an eminent economist Ranjit Singh Ghuman on Tuesday submitted its report to the Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal in his office.

Disclosing this a spokesman of the Chief Minister’s office said that the report revealed the cumulative notional loss to the farmers of Punjab due to non-linking of MSP of Wheat and Paddy with the Wholesale Price Index (WPI), comes out to be Rs.61696 crore during the last four decades (1968-69 - 2007-08).Of this, the state had suffered a huge loss to the tune of Rs.41411 crore on account of Wheat with annual average loss of Rs.1035 crore and Rs.20285 crore in case of Paddy with average loss of Rs.507 crore annually, due to non-linking of the MSP of Wheat & Paddy with WPI.

The Committee had also pointed out that the Commission for Agriculture Costs & Prices should, however, take into consideration the WPI while recommending the MSP. The WPI, however, should not be taken as the only basis for determining the MSP. There was, however, a need to periodically review and revise the list of indicators for determining the MSP, so that the farmers get remunerative prices of their produce.

The committee was however, of the considered opinion that the agrarian crisis and the farmers’ distress cannot solely be addressed with the instrument of MSP because in view of the larger interest of the other stake holders and the economy, MSP may not be raised beyond certain limits. The solution to the farmers’ distress and agrarian crisis would have to be looked beyond the MSP. In other words, the farmers, the state and the policy makers must also look into non-price solutions to address the crisis. That, however, does not mean that the farmers should not be given remunerative prices of their produce. They certainly deserve remunerative prices for their produce and a much better treatment and environment as they were the backbone of food security and that of Indian economy.

It was evident that Punjab had been a major contributor in the central pool of food grains during the last four decades. The share of Punjab’s Wheat in the central pool was as high as 79 percent in 1968-69 and 74 percent 1969-70. It varied between 53 per cent and 63 percent during 1970s. During the next decade, it oscillated between 54 percent and 72 percent. In 1990s, it varied between 51 percent and 71 percent, with a few exceptions. During 2001-02 and 2006-07 it remained between 52 percent and 75 percent. Likewise, states’ share of Rice in national food bowl increased from 7.36 percent in 1967-68 and 16.42 percent in 1970-71. It increased to 45.13 percent in 1977-78. Thereafter, it remained between 37 percent and 60 percent upto 1990-91. It, however, varied between 33 percent and 43 percent during the decade of 1990s. Thereafter, it hovered between 29 percent and 38 percent.

The Committee revealed in the entire process India became a food sufficient country and Punjab suffered a huge loss in terms of serious erosion of its soil fertility, depletion of sub-soil water and deteriorating ecological balance. Consequently, the Punjab farmers were now beleaguered in a serious socio-economic crisis.

The Chairman of the Committee Dr.Ranjit Singh Ghuman was accompanied by two other members Senior Economist & Consultant Punjab State Farmers Commission Dr.PS Rangi and Senior Economist (Marketing) from PAU Dr.MS Sidhu. Principal Secretary to Chief Minister DS Guru and Additional Principal Secretary to Chief Minister Gaggandip Singh Brar was also present on the occasion.

Punjab farmers suffer loss of Rs. 62000 crore printButton.png emailButton.png Punjab Newsline Network Tuesday, 01 September 2009 google_protectAndRun("ads_core.google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad);CHANDIGARH:A Committee on Minimum Support Price (MSP) & Price Index headed by an eminent economist Ranjit Singh Ghuman on Tuesday submitted its report to the Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal in his office.

Disclosing this a spokesman of the Chief Minister’s office said that the report revealed the cumulative notional loss to the farmers of Punjab due to non-linking of MSP of Wheat and Paddy with the Wholesale Price Index (WPI), comes out to be Rs.61696 crore during the last four decades (1968-69 - 2007-08).Of this, the state had suffered a huge loss to the tune of Rs.41411 crore on account of Wheat with annual average loss of Rs.1035 crore and Rs.20285 crore in case of Paddy with average loss of Rs.507 crore annually, due to non-linking of the MSP of Wheat & Paddy with WPI.

The Committee had also pointed out that the Commission for Agriculture Costs & Prices should, however, take into consideration the WPI while recommending the MSP. The WPI, however, should not be taken as the only basis for determining the MSP. There was, however, a need to periodically review and revise the list of indicators for determining the MSP, so that the farmers get remunerative prices of their produce.

The committee was however, of the considered opinion that the agrarian crisis and the farmers’ distress cannot solely be addressed with the instrument of MSP because in view of the larger interest of the other stake holders and the economy, MSP may not be raised beyond certain limits. The solution to the farmers’ distress and agrarian crisis would have to be looked beyond the MSP. In other words, the farmers, the state and the policy makers must also look into non-price solutions to address the crisis. That, however, does not mean that the farmers should not be given remunerative prices of their produce. They certainly deserve remunerative prices for their produce and a much better treatment and environment as they were the backbone of food security and that of Indian economy.

It was evident that Punjab had been a major contributor in the central pool of food grains during the last four decades. The share of Punjab’s Wheat in the central pool was as high as 79 percent in 1968-69 and 74 percent 1969-70. It varied between 53 per cent and 63 percent during 1970s. During the next decade, it oscillated between 54 percent and 72 percent. In 1990s, it varied between 51 percent and 71 percent, with a few exceptions. During 2001-02 and 2006-07 it remained between 52 percent and 75 percent. Likewise, states’ share of Rice in national food bowl increased from 7.36 percent in 1967-68 and 16.42 percent in 1970-71. It increased to 45.13 percent in 1977-78. Thereafter, it remained between 37 percent and 60 percent upto 1990-91. It, however, varied between 33 percent and 43 percent during the decade of 1990s. Thereafter, it hovered between 29 percent and 38 percent.

The Committee revealed in the entire process India became a food sufficient country and Punjab suffered a huge loss in terms of serious erosion of its soil fertility, depletion of sub-soil water and deteriorating ecological balance. Consequently, the Punjab farmers were now beleaguered in a serious socio-economic crisis.

The Chairman of the Committee Dr.Ranjit Singh Ghuman was accompanied by two other members Senior Economist & Consultant Punjab State Farmers Commission Dr.PS Rangi and Senior Economist (Marketing) from PAU Dr.MS Sidhu. Principal Secretary to Chief Minister DS Guru and Additional Principal Secretary to Chief Minister Gaggandip Singh Brar was also present on the occasion.

CHANDIGARH:A Committee on Minimum Support Price (MSP) & Price Index headed by an eminent economist Ranjit Singh Ghuman on Tuesday submitted its report to the Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal in his office.

Disclosing this a spokesman of the Chief Minister’s office said that the report revealed the cumulative notional loss to the farmers of Punjab due to non-linking of MSP of Wheat and Paddy with the Wholesale Price Index (WPI), comes out to be Rs.61696 crore during the last four decades (1968-69 - 2007-08).Of this, the state had suffered a huge loss to the tune of Rs.41411 crore on account of Wheat with annual average loss of Rs.1035 crore and Rs.20285 crore in case of Paddy with average loss of Rs.507 crore annually, due to non-linking of the MSP of Wheat & Paddy with WPI.

The Committee had also pointed out that the Commission for Agriculture Costs & Prices should, however, take into consideration the WPI while recommending the MSP. The WPI, however, should not be taken as the only basis for determining the MSP. There was, however, a need to periodically review and revise the list of indicators for determining the MSP, so that the farmers get remunerative prices of their produce.

The committee was however, of the considered opinion that the agrarian crisis and the farmers’ distress cannot solely be addressed with the instrument of MSP because in view of the larger interest of the other stake holders and the economy, MSP may not be raised beyond certain limits. The solution to the farmers’ distress and agrarian crisis would have to be looked beyond the MSP. In other words, the farmers, the state and the policy makers must also look into non-price solutions to address the crisis. That, however, does not mean that the farmers should not be given remunerative prices of their produce. They certainly deserve remunerative prices for their produce and a much better treatment and environment as they were the backbone of food security and that of Indian economy.

It was evident that Punjab had been a major contributor in the central pool of food grains during the last four decades. The share of Punjab’s Wheat in the central pool was as high as 79 percent in 1968-69 and 74 percent 1969-70. It varied between 53 per cent and 63 percent during 1970s. During the next decade, it oscillated between 54 percent and 72 percent. In 1990s, it varied between 51 percent and 71 percent, with a few exceptions. During 2001-02 and 2006-07 it remained between 52 percent and 75 percent. Likewise, states’ share of Rice in national food bowl increased from 7.36 percent in 1967-68 and 16.42 percent in 1970-71. It increased to 45.13 percent in 1977-78. Thereafter, it remained between 37 percent and 60 percent upto 1990-91. It, however, varied between 33 percent and 43 percent during the decade of 1990s. Thereafter, it hovered between 29 percent and 38 percent.

The Committee revealed in the entire process India became a food sufficient country and Punjab suffered a huge loss in terms of serious erosion of its soil fertility, depletion of sub-soil water and deteriorating ecological balance. Consequently, the Punjab farmers were now beleaguered in a serious socio-economic crisis.

The Chairman of the Committee Dr.Ranjit Singh Ghuman was accompanied by two other members Senior Economist & Consultant Punjab State Farmers Commission Dr.PS Rangi and Senior Economist (Marketing) from PAU Dr.MS Sidhu. Principal Secretary to Chief Minister DS Guru and Additional Principal Secretary to Chief Minister Gaggandip Singh Brar was also present on the occasion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Head granthi Bangla Sahib, usually does the evening kathas. Often gives examples of his visits and people he met in the uk and USA.
    • Amritsar needs to become it's own city-state country similar to Vatican City, or an area with it's own government like the City of London region within London. Even during the Misl era, the Misls would come together to defend Amritsar.
    • Umm, that's totally irrational, bro. There are plenty of prakash-dara Singhs in Punjab (less than we'd like, but still plenty). No one cares that you are sabat soorat. It isn't 1986. You can walk around in chola, kurta-pajama, or jeans. Whatever. If you want the look @dallysingh101 is referring to, just go into a cheap clothing shop (not a Western-style mall) and buy some shirts for 250 rupees or a track suit for 2000 rupees. You'll get the cheap stuff made in some sweatshop in Bombay.
    • The Mind is Jyot Saroop (Waheguru), but the mind is under the influence of five evils… Through Naam Simran( Rememberance), the mind will begin to detach from evil, and get back to its original form ( MANN TU JYOT SAROOP HEH)… Until the mind breaks free from the five evils, one will go through the cycle of paap and punn….which leads to Karma… Naam Simran destroys past karma, and prevents new karma coming into fruition… I did this, I did that… This non realisation of the Jyot Saroop gives rise to paap and Punn, which in turn gives birth to suffering and misery…
    • I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use