POODNA
-
Posts
127 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Calendar
Forums
Everything posted by POODNA
-
Pictures Of Sikh Gurus Hung Inside Bar In L.a, California
POODNA replied to POODNA's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
Does not make it acceptable -
Pictures Of Sikh Gurus Hung Inside Bar In L.a, California
POODNA posted a topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
http://dailysikhupdates.com/2013/09/19/pictures-of-guru-gobind-singh-ji-hung-in-a-bar-in-california-sikhs-outraged/ http://dailysikhupdates.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Screen-Shot-2013-09-25-at-11.32.05-AM.png As of late Thursday night pictures of Sikh Gurus continue to be hung inside the “Maharaja Room” of Pikey Bar. United Sikhs representative Karam Grewal spoke to the manager of the bar Hallelujah Walcott, who told him that the portraits would be removed “very soon.” However, no definite timeline was established. Karam Grewal of United Sikhs was quoted telling India-West Magazine: “Our religion is very against drinking. Hanging pictures of our guru where people are drinking is very disrespectful,” Karam Grewal, told India-West Magazine. “Images of Guru Gobind Singh are only found in gurdwaras or in private homes,” the Indian American said, adding that Pikey has tried to create an Indo-British feel to its Maharaja room, where portraits of maharajahs hang alongside pictures of Sikh saints. “They’re being passive aggressive. They have said they will take them down, but have not told us when. They realize that they have hurt a lot of people, but they’re not doing anything about it,” she said, adding that Pikey’s managers should close that part of the restaurant or at least cover the portraits until the matter is settled. Another Publication called WEHOville spoke to the Manager of Pikey’s Bar Noam Rubin regarding the removal of the pictures, the manager said Pikey’s is waiting for replacement paintings to arrive. The bar is owned by New York hotelier Sean MachPherson whose net worth is estimated at 800 Million dollars according to India West Magazine. Committed, Inc. is the company the Bar is under which Owns eight restaurants in Southern California and a number of hotels in New York. United Sikhs have asked the owner to donate the portraits to a local Gurdwara after removal. -
He doesn't deserve being spoken to. He needs a solid back hander
-
Gay Sikh Twitter Account An Anti-Sikh Conspriacy Against Sikhism?
POODNA replied to genie's topic in POLITICS | LIFESTYLE
Homosexuality is synonomous to sexual 'disorientation' -
Do Moneh Have The Right To Ask Sikh Question Or Talk About Sikhi?
POODNA replied to DalbirSingh's topic in WHAT'S HAPPENING?
Moneh are not Sikhs. 'Rehat bina na sikh kahave' - Guru Gobind Singh Ji. -
There would be no problem if all 'Sikhs' stuck to Guru Gobind Singh Ji's 52 hukams.
-
Akal Takht have already issued a hukamnama forbiding a Sikh to marry a non-Sikh. The sad truth is that these days there is widespread ignorance of Akal Takht's hukam. It doesn't make a shred of difference.
-
It's just part of the parcel. Saying humanity is the same does not equate to standing up for such disgraceful behaviour. Homosexuals are sick in the head
-
He's just a neoage hippi sikh. The sort that use Sikhi as a means to justify homosexuality. Veer away from such manmakh's
-
Fasting is utter pakhand. True rightousness is for life, not just a month.
-
He's an <banned word filter activated>. Just needs a good nihang thrashing.
-
You don’t need to be gay to understand this. This justification has become so widespread that most if most non-gays have learnt to believe it, you can only just imagine the conviction a homosexual will have in this. I say this without a shadow of doubt. Manmukh's have throughout time sought for justifications for their bakwas. This is nothing unique to homosexuality.
-
http://www.sikharchives.com/?p=7468 Is there any surprise this sort of filth is filtering in to our Gurdware in front of Guru Sahib when we seem to be wasting out energy vehemently 'protecting the rights' of such bakwas/gandh. Whilst we don’t have hatred towards any indivisual, it is important to take a firm stance against this bakwas. I'm glad the Akal Takht has spoken out against this nonsense. We need to follow suit. http://www.sikhnet.com/news/akal-takht-says-no-gay-relationships
-
I couldn’t disagree more. This is a western justification to justify such filthy, animal-like behaviour. Homosexuality is a choice.
-
You must have a problem with understanding simple English. For the N’th time all I am saying is that from a Sikh prospective homosexuality is an unacceptable sin like countless others such as rape, paedophilia and slavery. I have not gone as far as saying which is worse as I don't consider that my duty. It is enough knowing it is wrong to prevent it (or you would think so).
-
Well put Veer Ji. I couldn't agree more! Bole So Nihal! Sat Sri Akal!!
-
That's not the point I made. For the N'time my point is homosexuality is a sin from a sikh prospective and im not in the business of comparing it to other sins. There is no obligation to protect the right of anyone practicing a 'sin'. The Guru's never did this and it seems ludicrous worrying about the 'rights' of such people.
-
You will only get opinions here. I have only been using this website for a few days but enough to tell me there are a lot of misinformed people here. If I were you I would contact the Sri Akal Takht Sahib (Sikh's highest temporal authority) and have your work reviewed and approved by them before publication. You will only get opinions here. I have only been using this website for a few days but enough to tell me there are a lot of misinformed people here. If I were you I would contact the Sri Akal Takht Sahib (Sikh's highest temporal authority) and have your work reviewed and approved by them before publication.
-
Thanks Jazzy B for bringing thug culture to Sikhi. You have the biggest khanda chain because your an amazing Sikh.
-
Jazzy B doesn't care about Sikhi, Bhindrawala, hard core or anyone. He's a punjabi singer and will his priority is to make money. That's it. And he's bloody good at it. Sell out!
-
As I've mentioned I'm not in the business of saying who's worse. That's Dharam Rai's job. I am however saying homosexuality is a sin just like paedophilea, slaveowners etc. Using the term shaitan does not make you Muslim. It's used informally throughout common punjabi. Your just looking for lame arguments that's don't support your case. At the end of the day Sri Akal Takht have not only condemned homosexuality, they have quite rightly ridiculed it. Just 10 years earlier nobody would have had a problem with this. The reality is western society see homosexualsas a race. It's NOT a race. It's a despicable behaviour and should be treated as such.
-
Your just making me repeat myself. I've already stated why only a heterosexual relationship ( in the context of Anand Karaj) is not only permissible but necessary.
-
I feel we're going around in circles. In the end Sri Alal Takht's Hukam is clear and unequivocal. There really is no space for this Bakwas in Sikhi. I feel homosexuals are utter kanjars to be precise.
-
That's not the point I'm making. It is a term used synonymously to describe any sort of manmath practice or vice.
-
Yes Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji protected the rights of Hindus to practice their dharam, hence the term 'dharam di chadar'. But protecting the rights of homosexuals is equivalent to 'shaitan di chadar'. There is a major difference in protecting the rights of someone practicing their faith or indulging in manmath behaviour. I have already used the alcohol analogy. Would 'Sikh's' protect the right of alcoholics drinking more alcohol or give them a helping hand? Yes Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji protected the rights of Hindus to practice their dharam, hence the term 'dharam di chadar'. But protecting the rights of homosexuals is equivalent to 'shaitan di chadar'. There is a major difference in protecting the rights of someone practicing their faith or indulging in manmath behaviour. I have already used the alcohol analogy. Would 'Sikh's' protect the right of alcoholics drinking more alcohol or give them a helping hand?