Ranjeet01

Like I may have pointed out before, this system has a pecking order as to who gets preferential victim status. Sikhs are bottom of the pile.

You could say the only reason India is secular is because it is a majority Hindu. Once it becomes non Hindu, secularism gets thrown away. This type of system happens in a democracy, where there vote bank and numbers count. What could happen to save India from Islamisation is to throw away the democratic structure and enforce a more autocratic system where vote bank politics and breeding become irrelevant.

Secularism in India does not mean the same thing that we know it as the west There is a reason in India Secular is called Sickular. In the west, Secularism means separation of religion and state. In India it means separation of Hindu and state. The Indian secularists are the dhimmis.

You see the similar tactics employed in the UK. Wherever there is a muslim owned businesses, they tend to have a prayer room attached to it and it becomes a defacto mosque.

In Queens, there were areas where a Chinese Laundry guy or an Indian Sikh cab driver would not venture because they would be killed for 10 bucks. These are black neighbourhoods where it was so deprived you would be killed to buy food. This attack is more of a racial undertone. After 9-11 , many of our Sikhs were attacked by whites but not so much by ethnic groups. 20 years ago, this seems to have changed. However like much of Sikh migration in the New York area (Queens), they are moving further east into Long Island.

I nominate you and CaliforniaSardar. Sort them out!

I have not seen this as yet, as I would be seething with rage once I have seen it Is the globo-homo agenda trying to subvert things again?

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/chandigarh-news/british-sikh-engineer-s-low-cost-washing-machines-to-head-to-india-101628968625183.html

I recall there was a Singh who invented a washing drum to wash clothes with. It was non electrical and it had a handle that you rotated.

I think that when people get married that there should be vetting against the families you are marrying into.

The son cannot see their mother in that way. It is not just another woman. You see how a male can be insulted but say anything against their mother and they will feel enraged. A mother is seen as sacred.

We as Sikhs ideally should aim for 3 children. Not too many that standards of living go down but enough to be above replacement. Ideally these kids should be born so the oldest child is around 6 years older than the youngest children at the most.

Muslims in general are an r-selected type of people, we on the other hand are more k-selected type.

You need to stop putting sports people on a pedestal.

When we look at the reduced muslim birth rate after education, we are looking at 6 children to 3 or 4 children. When our parents had siblings, they were big families with 5-6 brothers and sisters. But they decided to have 2-3 children and that is without being educated. The next generation after that with education have 1-2 children. What does this tell you? Muslim religion is more collectivist in that group think is more important. The educated Muslim female will do what is for the greater good of their deen and their ummah. Us Sikhs are more individualist than Muslims, our educated Sikh women will not do the same for our quam.

It does not matter what Tendulkar thinks Just because he was a good batsman does not make his opinion valid in any other matters.

Not a particularly big cricket fan. India is a country where humans are worshipped, Tendulkar is not a God, he is just a human being.

It is a culture where there is lack of accountability. No one is going to apologise because by doing so is showing weakness. You never hear anyone say , " Meri galti, mah maafi karnia " Blame shifting is common.

Indian culture by and large is a blame culture. It is a culture that does not like you to go out there and make mistakes. Mistakes are how you learn. How often have you seen an Indian teacher beat a kid for making a tiny mistake. The Indian has the incapability of explaining why one method is wrong and why another method is better. You are just expected to know. For that particular reason people can become risk averse and defer authority.

Indians are know-it-alls at all ages. They are experts in politics,sports,philosophy, legal system, immigration system, history. The phrase "I don't know" does not exist for them. They know more than the actual experts who studied from hearing something off the grapevine. They basically bluff and BS a lot.

One should realise that no matter what race or religion that a politician is, a politician is just a politician. We should not expect that just because they are the same skin colour as us that it would do us any favours.

Not always. Indians are generally quite cunning but found themselves conquered for over a thousand years. When you try to be too cunning, you play yourself.

She is from India after all. There are about 600 million Lady MacBeths there.

It is easier to con a crafty cunning person than an honest person. This is because the cunning person lives in a state of self deception.

I wonder if future governments would enforce some kind of 2 child policy for every couple. That way people won't gave extra children for benefits and it will enforce muslims to have less children so they don't impact the demographics. Even if they pull fast one, take their children and give them away to be raised as non-muslims.