Jump to content

Ranjeet01

Members
  • Posts

    4,384
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    67

Everything posted by Ranjeet01

  1. They are delusional bunch: 1 moment they speak Hindi because Punjabi is a course rude language 2nd moment they will say they are Punjabi when a new film comes out.( I knew a Gujju girl who claimed to be half Punjabi. I then probed her and she admitted that her massi married a Punjabi Hindu guy ) 3rd moment they will say Sikhs are Hindus and Dashmesh was there to protect Hindus 4th moment, they call every Sikh Khalistani and are baying for blood. They are all over the place. Fickle people. Emotionally erratic.
  2. On the interview, Barkha Dutt mentions that she is Punjabi, but Deep Sidhu basically told her that she does not know the ground realities of Punjab as a Delhite. Then she tried to emphasise her credentials. Deep Sidhu's polite retort was to kind of say ," You have no idea what you are talking about" I can't understand these types. They suddenly remember their Punjabi roots when it suits them.
  3. I am quite aware of Barkha Dutt. She is hated by Hindus and seen as Anti-Indian. She is very sympathetic to Kashmiri Muslim causes and was said to give away Indian positions during the Kargil War. Her political stance has always been more Pro Pakistan. They (Hindus) call her a presstitute. She has the gall to call Bindrawale a terrorist whilst mixing and mingling with Pakistani supporters of separation of her beloved India and that includes Islamic terrorists. The liberal Urban elite Hindu is very different from the average Hindu. The average Hindu hates these "liberal" types. This particular type of McCauliyite Hindu allowed the British Raj to happen, were the dhimmis that worked in the Mughal administration and were the Jai Chand types that sided with Ghori over Pritviraj Chauhan. They in their post-partition avatar are representative to globalist interests. Might I also add, we need to cool, calm, rational Sikhs like Deep Sidhu. I think that we have a reputation of being hot headed but Barkha like a lot of these "liberal" types had no real answer to what he said. It is very easy to push their buttons.
  4. I did not realise that the shipping kids into those schools went that far back, but it is probably even greater now. However, a lot of kids struggle in Grammar School that they have to take external tuition. Tuition is very lucrative. There is a whole industry behind this. But I guess the thing that Grammar schools have over a lot of secondary schools (other than academics ) is there is some level of discipline. It is the discipline in classes that helps the students and teachers focus on education rather than being distracted by unruly pupils. Secondary schools seem to have a discipline problem because they are full off unruly pupils. I know this very simplistic but I once was listening to one of the school inspectors on radio and it was one of things he mentioned. What is very interesting about having Sikh Secondary school for many of our people is that provides an opportunity for another viable option in their minds other than Grammar Schools. There have been parents who have been willing to bypass the 11 plus just to get into a more safe secure school if the opportunity arose.
  5. The kids are failing the test us because even back in 1990's you were in competition with kids in your own home town. Your grammar schools are no longer full of local kids but kids coming far afield like Hounslow, Harrow etc. There is far more competition. This is having a two fold effect: 1.) Kids in your home town are being pushed into schools further afield. 2.)Kids in your hometown are being pushed into those less desirable schools so much so that the standards of those less desirable schools are beginning to see improvements. Check the GCSE / A levels in some of those secondary schools. They are higher than the national average. What you are also beginning to see is that one over-achieving generation is not going to translate into the next generation because those parents who have gone through the system are quite disillusioned with it all. Most kids that get into grammar schools are in there because they have been coached to pass and when they get into the grammar school they struggle. It does not hold the same appeal as it used to.
  6. There is a lot of wrapping kids in cotton wool. Kids don't even walk to school, the parents drop them to school. Kids in the previous generations would take buses (even at primary school level) That kid was on his way home and he was attacked.
  7. There are generalisations which are actually truth. Here is a generalisation, men are physically stronger than women and are quite capable of overpowering one and getting his way if he so chooses to do so. Men are far more physically aggressive, that is a truth. But as men the vast majority of us will not do that. No one will ever dispute that. Women in general because they are less physically imposing understand this very well, so they have to deploy other things at their disposal, like cunning. To get what they need they will utilise the methods of manipulation. That is a fact. It is not that every woman will, but every woman could. This is part of the base nature of women. This is not any hatred, this is just an objective reality. Now if a man was to impose physically his will on any female, if caught doing so, will be in a physical altercation with other men as it is natural for men to protect those who are weaker. However, how many women will defend a man (other than his mother or sister) if he is being psychologically or emotionally tortured by a highly cunning manipulative woman.
  8. I find this "from women, men are born " quote from gurbani very troublesome in my mind. Bul chuk maf if I cause any offence. Please help me understand. If we call Indira Gandhi bad, is it wrong because she is a woman even though she stormed our holiest place and killed so many people? She gave birth to Rajiv Gandhi. Was he a king? And how many innocent Sikhs did he kill? If women are capable of great things, than can they be capable of terrible things too? Or does having a womb exempt them from this?
  9. Slough has the blessing and the curse of having 5 grammar schools. If you don't get into grammar schools, your options are limited. I know what school you went to.
  10. I saw this video on a little girl's 5th birthday party and she got a lap dance by a tranny/drag queen. The girl was petrified but her mother was bopping along. No father would allow that!
  11. Looking at the school, it is poorly performing school, probably full of chavvy council estate kids. Being a Singh particularly in this type of environment is a sitting target. The only thing now is the advent of social media. Everything is filmed and then it goes viral. Also, has there ever been a situation where a Singh got into a fight and his dastar remained intact?
  12. If you want to subvert a society, you manipulate the women. Women as individuals are shrewd and cunning but collectively they can be sheep like. Men are quite simple and straightforward in general but collectively but we tend to pick up on the general subversive tactics that are being imposed on society. It is natural male instinct to protect their families from this kind of gandh. This is the type of bakwas happens in a gynocentric society.
  13. You ever notice all this trans/drag stuff is encouraged by the mothers.
  14. See the solidarity amongst them critiquing them as a concerned Sikh brother. The male counterparts think they are getting some kind of approval. However, put a disgusting Muslim male who talks obscene things amongst them and the Kaurs get very giddy and go off with them and those male counterparts who will defend their "honour" get tossed aside??
  15. I see with the downvotes the sisterhood does not like what it is being said.
  16. The ones who have the power are the ones who are not allowed to be criticised.
  17. Philip Schofield of all people behind all these Kalyugi stuff. Though the signs where there many years ago, stuck in a BBC broom cupboard with his hand up Gordon the Gophers a**! ??
  18. The difference between the Rajputs and Jat (they are largely the same stock) is that Rajputs accepted Brahmin authority whereas Jatts didnt.
  19. A lot of these ancient texts have stories embellished around some actual events that may have taken place. Some of these stories are metaphors and some of these may have been misinterpreted. For example, Ravana had the intelligence of 10 men so it was like he had 10 heads has been interpreted that he literally had 10 heads.
  20. Our bodies naturally create DMT when we are sleep, particularly during REM sleep. I think it is related to pre-frontal cortex of the brain. A lot of westerners go to Peru and Brazil to do Ayahuasca. Very similar to your first video. A lot of them never come back the same as they apparently meet with the "lady of the vine". This lady of the vine tells them where they have gone wrong in their lives.
  21. The ancient city off the coast of Gujarat is the original Dwarka, the birth place of Krishna. The Mahabharata happened before the ice age. They have also found the land bridge that linked India with Sri Lanka. It is under water. So Ramayana would also taken place before the ice age. Hanuman was possibly some form if human. There were various humans other than Homo Sapiens like Homo Erectus, Homo Neanderthal, Homo Denisovan, Homo Austropithicus etc etc. The human race has a collective amnesia and we as dharmics believe in things being cyclical. Humans have had that reset button set several times.
  22. Maybe not millions of years but at least a few hundred thousand years. They are finding different types of humans that existed. It's quite possible.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use