MisterrSingh

I've always thought that if our people used the same cunning and ruthlessness against non-Sikhs as we delight in using against our own, we'd be a world power by now, lmao.

Rehnde, this isn't Euro 96, bro. ??

It was an abnegation of responsibility and duty. They could've created a heaven on earth. Instead they sold out humanity for what? Material things. Wealth and sex. F****rs.

I've come to realise not doing this was a big, big mistake. When they inevitably get to a certain population point in India, will they agitate for another partition? Is there going to be a partition of India every 150 years because these people can't stop breeding and causing trouble? That has to be their plan. Partition India into smaller Islamic states, lol.

It's a little more Machiavellian than that. Liberals, right-wingers, and the rest of these labels are a smokescreen. If I start expanding upon the henhouse analogy I might as well start throwing out actual names, lmao. But that last sentence in bold is absolute truth. That's what concerns me. I have no time for Hollywoodised hero fantasies about someone riding in to save the day. When that time comes it'll be brutal. If Corona has taught us anything, when the government and its various institutions want to put the squeeze on the people, the police don't think twice about following orders, and the media plays its usual psychological gaslighting tricks on the public. Unfortunately, most people fall into line. Imagine a future Anglo UK establishment populated by Pakistanis, Somalians, Banglas, Turks, protected by an Islamophobhia legislation, because with their numbers and representation by the time things get bad for the rest of us, they aren't going to be content with owning supermarkets, auto garages, and the rest. They'll want the real reigns of power, and nothing will stop them from getting it.

I think when something "breaks" a male, he starts to see everyone, including parents, for who they are instead of what they portray themselves as. Trauma has the propensity to destroy lives, but it also has the potential to open eyes. When the eyes finally open, best hope mommy and daddy are exactly who they say they are.

Women are going to women as harsh as that may sound, but in these cases I just can't believe how the sons don't see the manipulation that's happening before their own eyes. This stuff doesn't happen in homes where the father wears the trousers and knows the exact goings on in his household.

I have a fairly accurate idea but nothing I'd discuss here in detail. Basically, it's like unleashing a wolf in a hen house to wreak havoc and destroy the hens, and then after a while a tiger is unleashed into the same henhouse to kill the wolf. That's about the past 60 years and the next 30 years in summary.

It's not surprising. We aren't the tribe of noble and upstanding individuals as the tales suggest. There's a dark, depressing underbelly that flirt with depravity on a daily basis.

The infuriating thing about this statistic in our current clown world is that Muslims won't be instructed to stop bearing children beyond their means which is what would happen in a sane, rational country. Instead, the political and cultural establishment will be terrified of suggesting such a thing, and reframe Islamic poverty as a symptom of a discriminatory society, and the problem can only be rectified by awarding them more resources and power. The damaged children in these home environments will then either be encouraged or automatically gravitate towards their evil religious ideology to make sense of their surroundings. These f4ckers create the environment for jihad, and then feed their own people into the meat grinder to perpetuate the same circumstances for more jihad! How long can this continue?

Alright, take it easy, bro. Don't pollute your thoughts. The one gullible brother who prioritises his cunning siblings even in old age is a common problem in Sikh families in India in terms of what you're describing.

Are you a bhainchod akj bhappa?

By "Sikh" I thought you meant the masses, not the leadership or elite figureheads. It's a given that anyone who emerges to corral a demographic has to be a maverick who rejects the established order. The key for these leaders is to convince the people to abandon / exchange one set of beliefs for their new paradigm. History proves that it's not that difficult to do so especially in the past.

I've never been an advocate for abandoning parents, but in your case anyone would struggle to criticize you for doing it. It's a miracle you aren't a serial killer or a paedo or something. You should be proud of yourself for not succumbing to the flaws of the people who provided you with your GENES. It's good you've found refuge in Sikhi. I guess it's the difference between trying to retain some semblance of sanity and completely going off the rails. You should find a woman to marry. You're still young. There's 50 year old guys who consider themselves munde ripe for marriage, lol. Find a small place of your own, find a woman, and get on with it, because I guarantee if you let your current situation simmer as it is, you'll wake up at 50, realise your life has been wasted, and you'll want to put a shotgun in your mouth. Be strong, be forceful, put your foot down.

That's sad, bro. On the bright side you were intelligent enough to pinpoint the cause of the relationship breakdown. Most guys persist under the belief that it "just happened" or blame the wife at the insistence of the mother.

I imagine it would be difficult to maintain a balance of genuine respect and affection for elders when knowing that a particular elder is fundamentally wrong about most things. I've always liked those scenes in the Godfather when Vito decides to retire from being the Don after he recovers from his attempted murder, passing control to Michael. He fades into the background, acting solely as an advisor to Michael who ultimately is encouraged to stand up and make decisions and lead. Even when the old timers gravitate towards Vito in Michael's presence, he gently ushers them to Michael in order to cement the idea that Vito's no longer The Top Man. Fiction or not, that's wisdom and a sense of being secure enough in your own skin to know when to gracefully cede control of the family's day-to-day running.

Not suggesting you're incorrect, but I've struggled to understand how we were ever independent minded. Educate me.

I don't see how Sunak would be good for us. Like, at all. Any reason he would be that I'm missing? Desi-fied Brits fundamentally misunderstand (or are ignorant of) the British class system, and how apne who enter elite circles consider those of their same ethnic background who didn't make it to be invisible. This is even more pronounced in a group like Sikhs, and is another manifestation of the problem I identified of us having an identity that is gradually degrading.

Irrelevant. Being the good guys means to fight with nobility and ultimately lose, meaning the bad guys win the war? How many will ultimately suffer if the good guys don't play fire with fire? That's what Dharma is: responding like with like WHEN the situation calls for it. Shirking responsibility while being preoccupied with "goodness" is adharma.

Wondering if this anti-Sunak coverage is payback from Johnson for the incessant Downing Street lockdown parties controversy that had him on the ropes and on the verge of losing his job? There were whispers Sunak had orchestrated the leaking of those events to get the Prime Minister's job. Seems Johnson wanted payback, knowing Labour would jump on the pile-on against Sunak. Although the revelation of Sunak's financial arrangements isn't racially motivated, I think there's definitely an intended racial aspect to him being lowered a peg or two in his standing. His missus looks like a chalakho, though. She seems like the woman who prides herself on being her husband's trusted advisor in how to secure power. A proper Lady Macbeth.

Where was this honour when Karna and multiple Kurus attacked and murdered Arjun's unarmed 16 year old son?

Where did you learn that from? How does someone who doesn't know of Amritsar's religious significance to Sikhs, suddenly know that keeping uncut hair is a requirement for Sikhs. It's not written in the Guru Granth Sahib aside from some philosophical musing about how adhering to certain rehats at the expense of others is irreligious and hypocritical. So, you've studied rehatnamas (that specify the keeping of unshorn hair), have you? Then why are the original questions in your first post such a mystery to you? What was the reason for posting them? I'd be a lot more sympathetic to your plight if trying to get a straight answer out of you wasn't like trying to nail water to a wall. Cue your response, "I don't need your sympathy." Frig me. Whatever post-modern Western social philosophies you've filled your head with haven't served you well, have they? The way you rationalise the issues that obviously cause you mental distress by jumping through hoops and shielding the very things and people who deserve your scorn tells me you're very afraid of embracing certain truths. I don't think you're serious about finding a woman at all. Our Punjabi system of securing partners is fool-proof. Yet every time someone offers you solution, you put up a wall of excuses. OTHERS: Get married. YOU: My genes are 5hit. OTHERS: Exercise and eat well. You'll gain confidence and feel better. That radiates to women. YOU: No point. They won't change my genes. OTHERS: You can find an amritdhari wife if you take amrit. YOU: No point. I'm not "good enough" to be an amritdhari. I'd only disgrace the demographic. --- Ultimately, your keshdhari advocacy rings hollow because you REFUSE to take the next natural step to seal the deal as it were. I know you believe - but you'll never admit on here - that taking amrit is unnecessary to being a Sikh, which is why you put up that wall of pakandh to avoid taking amrit, which is your choice after all. But at least be honest. That list of questions you posted at the beginning was a "clever" attempt at trying to get people to claim certain things about Sikhi which you could rebut by arguing none of those things are explicitly stated in Sikh scriptures, therefore strengthening your position as to why you don't think amrit is a requirement for a keshdhari. As much as I agree with you about certain issues on kesh-related matters, I can't take anything you say seriously because of the veiled intent behind your words. You don't argue for kesh philosophically or spiritually, or because it moves you from a religious point of view; you argue for it simply because you're emotionally resentful. There's no substance to it. It rings hollow because you avoid doing the very thing that will aid you in securing the thing you desire most. So we go around in a circle.

20' years of appeals, threatening to shut the station down unless elderly pensioners fill in Direct Debits. ??

Sorry, that's it. Forgot about that. ?