MisterrSingh

I'll respond to your posts like a civilised person when you curb that horrible little habit of yours where you insult someone to make yourself feel superior, because you have no idea how to disagree with somebody without insulting them. It's a third-world mindset. You just can't help yourself. It's that typically Indo-Canadian manner symptomatic of people of your background who actually don't get out much, lol, yet as usual you're projecting. I think crying and being couped-up inside is your specialty, not mine. Notice, I behave well with the majority of the people on this forum even when I disagree with someone, but you bring out the worst in me. Even now you're thinking, "I'm never wrong. It's everyone else who is mistaken. I'm above reproach!" To that I say, LOL. You've proven my point. Do me a favour a put me on ignore. You really grind my gears to the point where after interacting with you I feel like doing this to you:

You should change your username to the above, because that's all you ever seem to say. ? I suppose what you're saying -- by omission -- is that rehat and adherence to maryada is unnecessary for a Sikh; the old "Dil Sahf Hona Chaiyda" maxim. Am I correct? ?

If there's a sudden mass media reveal of alien life or alien visitations, it's bullcrap. I'm not suggesting theoretically it's nonsense, but any hypothetical revelation at this moment in time is a fabricated distraction.

Okay, you have nothing intelligent or noteworthy to add, so you resort to insults, because you can't refute anything I've said. Pathetically redundant weakling. See, I'm following your brave example. Be a good boy and jog on. I'm not interested in dealing with your retardation.

Occult literature. Powerful seers and psychics conducted what's known as "Distant Seeing" where they convene to uncover the mysteries of these places from the creation of the planet to its destruction and everything in-between.

Again, nobody is under any obligation to accommodate us. Asking a question, even in a coarse, brusque manner is not evil racism. Orientals are known for not having a politically correct filter. You want to change minds and hearts? Then explain what that "cloth" is on a Sikh's head, and its significance. You don't go crying to big daddy media hoping to propagandise, bully, and shame a corporate entity into change. That may work in the West, but you'll be met with resistance in the Far East, and it will lead to resentment and the eventual closing of doors to Sikhs. Now, this guy has most likely led to the company in question developing a silent "No Sikh" policy whereby even the CV / resume of a Sikh applicant will be silently rejected under the pretence of some other reason, because the organisation assumes we're troublemakers. So, actually, this "brave" act was poorly conceived and hastily executed, and it's done more long-term harm for Sikhs in that part of the world. I repeat: the Far East is not the West. There's a fundamental cultural difference that is hard to imagine for us sitting here. There are certain entities present in the cultural and corporate institutions in the West that are non-existent over there. There is no bending to so-called public will. The answer isn't silence. The answer is to respond with "force" without burning bridges. Unfortunately, I think the subtleties of such issues are lost on us.

And neither are under any obligation to tolerate us. They struggle to treat their native people with decency, what makes us think we'll fare any better? It's so embarrassing when we start crying and complaining about discrimination.

So true. In these cynical times full of frauds masquerading as the real deal, we begin to judge the great souls of the past by our current standards. It becomes hard to imagine these true spiritual feats when the power of the illusion that currently surrounds us is so overwhelming.

I see where you're coming from, but there is no silver lining in this situation. The Christian goes for the heart when recruiting while the Muslim in a characteristic display of impatient tactlessness goes for the head. The Christian method being considerably less abrasive is no less damaging to us than the Muslim conversion. Both are our enemies. The end result is the same: the elimination of Sikhs and the eventual erasure of the Sikh faith.

They put Doabians (I'm one; it's a label, nothing more to me) to shame with their desire to keep Sikhi going forward. Some of the popular upcoming Sikh parcharaks in India are from Malwa. I like the way they pronounce certain words, lol.

It was destroyed in a nuclear apocalypse. All human-equivalent lifeforms perished. There are rudimentary bipedal creatures (walking lizards) in existence that have evolved from the ashes of the destruction (we're talking over millions of years), but they're no more sophisticated than the smartest chips, although they have managed to form crude communities. Mars has had its time. It's our future.

Hey gurl! ?

I see the Femisikhs are out in force. They've gone on a passive-aggressive downvoting spree in this thread. Only women and effeminate men are so disturbed by opinions they disagree with. ??

It's separate in as much as it being a tool wielded by the Establishment for the purposes of publicly decrying sadistic acts of violence and sex against children, while much of the "machine" at the very summit of society indulgues in these acts themselves although for very different purposes. Once you look into the historical and esoteric functions of these sick practices, it all begins to make sense. Don't get me wrong, it's a LOT to take in. I still find myself baulking at some of it, but I've realised I shouldn't use my personal morality as a barometer to judge the moral capability of those considered to be our so-called societal betters. The occasional Islamic grooming gang thrown under the bus in that very public way is another media (or, more accurately, intelligence services) ploy. It's designed to achieve a few important things at different levels but on a simultaneous basis: 1) Placate certain groups in society in order to convince them that the justice system is fully functioning, and that those "paedo Muzzies" are being tracked and prosecuted for their crimes. 2) Stoke up festering resentment and hatred against Muslims. In this regard, Muslims don't make it easy on themselves, because a certain faction of their believers don't see anything objectionable with these types of acts. One might argue whether they act upon religious instruction when committing these acts or they just happen to belong to the religion, and they'd behave in much the same way regardless of whichever religion they belong to. Other Muslims may silently object to the philosophical basis on which these acts are arguably endorsed by their scriptures, but they make a personal decision not to "kill the unbeliever" and partake in acts which dehumanise non-Muslims (a personal reformation, one might say)... at least until they're in a position when they aren't a minority. 3) Demoralise and mentally subjugate weaker individuals who have neither the will or the strength to act and respond to these crimes. A person becomes a victim of their own mentality, and sometimes from this group emerges a person or people who crack under the pressure and take matters into their own hands. 4) Similar to the above group, there's another type of person who sees the indisputable acts of these crimes, but unable to process the idea that maybe -- perhaps -- Islam isn't a good idea (which would suggest the mere thought is evil and discriminatory), they retreat into denial, because the alternative would mean questioning and ultimately destroying all the values and beliefs they've been indoctrinated into believing are the truth. Most people aren't prepared to question and challenge everything they hold dear. It means starting from scratch, and that's too daunting a task for most. As more evidence emerges to lend support to that nagging voice in the back of their head that "something" is wrong, they silence that voice with the comforting notion that everything is fine, and eventually things will work themselves out. Yet, all the while, the true elite of society are free to partake in much the same degenerate evil, knowing full well there's very little chance of their depraved escapdes ever making the front pages.

You're being a pukki gence today. ?

I never implied it literally meant barely human. According to the diagram you posted with the hierarchy of species and types, it clearly shows Genus ranked among other types of beings, Human being one of the closest kinds. So, if Gence is an obscure derivative of the Latin Genus, then the Punjabi insult makes sense, i.e. you're a different species close to human but not quite. ?

Once you realise the Western establishment is populated by paedovores, it all begins to make sense. Islamic paedophilia is undoubtedly a problem, but it's a purposeful red herring that's deliberately given traction in order to draw the populace's attention from the degenerate and devilish tastes of our so-called masters. They have no intention of ever solving the Islamic grooming and rape problem because it keeps the heat off the true darkness at the heart of it all. It's also useful as a method of inculcating a deep hatred for Muzzies among a white population that is entering the very, very early stages of being empowered to fight back. It's a multifaceted, complex game that's being played.

So it's use in the Punjabi context is correct. It's an insult that suggests the target is barely human. ? Although, something tells me this isn't the word Jagsaw was looking for.

I use to come home from primary school, get changed, and lay down on the sofa to watch Rainbow. My dad use to say, "Eh munda kinha teet." I think it means either moderately lazy or a milder version of being cheeky; basically the person is pushing their luck, etc. Those old school Punjabi words -- the non-blue ones -- were amazing, lol. EDIT: I just saw Mokham Singh's definition of "teet", and that definitely makes more sense!

Yeah, that's the one. It's sometimes used in conjunction with the phrase, "Kutte di poosh." ?

Wise words.

Their bhaags and inner life are stamped on their faces and visible in their eyes. Dodgy. I'd usually say forehead, but can't see it because it's partially covered by dastaar.

Is it a hard G or a J-sounding G when pronounced? The closest Punjabi word to "Gence" that I'm familiar with is phonetically spelt "Jense" as in "Sense." I haven't heard it in decades. It was used as a noun to describe someone who is an incorrigible pain in the backside. I'm not sure of its true etymology. Regardless, if it's the word I'm thinking of it's never used in positive terms.