Jump to content

Martial Arts


Bhajneet
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm pretty sure that a horse rider can be defeated by a lone person on the ground. And i don't see how you HAVE to ride a horse to be a nihang.

96572[/snapback]

Nihang are world reknown for being very able horsemen. I never said they HAVE to ride a horse but would it not be better to get full training so the UK nihang were able to ride and fight on horseback as well as doing their fancy kirpan displays on the ground.

Pretty pointless being a nihang if you dont know how to ride a horse. A horse rider may be able to be defeated by a lone person on the ground, but I doubt a lone person could beat a nihang on a horse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pretty pointless being a nihang if you dont know how to ride a horse.

96600[/snapback]

pretty pointless being a nihang who can ride a horse in modern times though. I mean sure, its great you can do it, but why's it matter? I understand that traditionally they used to ride horses into battle, but seeing as we don't ride horses anymore, why would it matter?

And even a lone person with a simple bow could kill the horse that the nihang was riding on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or even a long stick with a spike on it, but i think most days one does not need a horse, well not the "uk nihangs" as u term them for the simple reason most poeple drive/ride cars/bikes, horses could be said to be old fashion n not up to date.

although i think Guru ji once said dnt come b4 me without a horse n weapons or was that kesh, oh never mind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or even a long stick with a spike on it, but i think most days one does not need a horse, well not the "uk nihangs" as u term them for the simple reason most poeple drive/ride cars/bikes, horses could be said to be old fashion n not up to date.

although i think Guru ji once said dnt come b4 me without a horse n weapons or was that kesh, oh never mind

96623[/snapback]

There is an old Hukumnama which asks Sikhs to keep horses.

Horses old fashioned ? Well weaponary has moved on a great deal and in the same sense horses are old fashioned then so are Nihang as most conventional armed forces use guns, mortars etc which no Nihang can fight against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

u see that whats so interesting, it could all be ended by a single bullet, but my knowledge nihangs in india have also trained with guns,

but how much knowledge do ya need to no to fire a gun maybe it'l take u 6 months a year toi be amazin at gun slingin. but to learn shastar vidiya it would take 3 years plus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru Jika Khalsa, Waheguru Jiki Fateh

The Japanese samurai, at the turn of the 19th century, realized the onslaught of the industrialization and modern material culture into the country...but they failed to stop it. However, the country have succesfully blended the spirit of the old samurai within modern living. When they were fighting in WW2, you did not see a bunch of soldiers with samurai swords attacking their enemies (though most of the officers in the army were carrying samurai swords). To keep up to modern warfare, they knew they needed mordern weapons. This martial arts stuff like shastarvidiyia, ju jitsu etc, won't help you fight against bullets and tanks; but we need them, because it reminds us who we are, where came from and it gives us martial discipline.

Gurfateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use