Jump to content

Singh Sabhas condemn article on Sikhs


nanosecond
 Share

Recommended Posts

Singh Sabhas condemn article on Sikhs

TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ TUESDAY, OCTOBER 07, 2003 02:27:37 PM ]

JALANDHAR: The Confederation of the Singh Sabhas of Jalandhar City has condemned " the highly obnoxious statement appearing in the October, 2003 issue of the Spokesman in which the Sikhs are referred to as 'jangli'." In a press release e-mailed to TNN the Confederation has reproduced part of the write-up.

It says : "Muglan de daur vich sikhan nun janglan vich ja chhupnan piya.Janglan vich reh ke sikhan ne ‘janglee’ adtan nu hi apna lya. Sara din khande peende rahe (jo kujh vi mile), larde rahe te galan kadhde rahe. Shahri jeevan vich vapas parat ke vi Sikh janglan dian adta nun aje tak nahin bhule..."

The press release further says that "the statement has been been deliberately made to hurt the sentiments of the entire Sikh world to take away their attention from the nefarious activities of the journal and his collaborators conspiring against the Sikh traditions of hukamnama and authority of Akal Takhat."

The release further says : "It is true that from time to time the governments of the day had been calling Sikhs as snakes, dogs, jaraim pesha (criminal tribe) and what not but it is for the first time that the entire Sikh community right from the time of Guru Gobind Singh ji to date have been dubbed as janglees and ravenous people constantly engaging themselves in name calling and invectives against each other."

The press release further states that the "period of eighteenth century is the most glorious period of Sikh history. The Sikhs made maximum sacrifices d

uring that period and at the cost of their lives kept the flame of Sikhism burning. This was the period when even the women and infants also had to pay for their life for adhering to the Sikh faith. Now dubbing those Sikhs as wild and calling them names is the most heinous and monstrous act. This is an insult to the entire Sikh nation and the Gurus and ought not be ignored."

The Confederation further states that " of late the Spokesman along-with certain disgruntled elements abhorrent to Sikh Rahit Maryada has been carrying on a tirade against the concept of Miri-Piri, the daily prayer and baptismal banees , the maryada of Harimandir Sahib, the principle of hukam-namas."

The Confederation has " warned the Sikhs to beware of the nefarious designs of this anti-Sikh group publishing such material. It is now evident that these people have ganged up against the concept and institution of Hukamnama because of their mentors Nirankari and Bhag Singh Ambala against whom Hukamnamas were issued by Akal Takhat ostracizing them from the Panth. Of these Bhag Singh Ambala had written against // sri bhagauti ji ki and benati chaupai patshahi dasvin penned by Guru Gobind Singh ji.

Bhag Singh Ambala had submitted himself before the Akal Takhat and sought forgiveness for his blasphemous writings. He was pardoned. But now this group comprising Mohinder Singh Bakshi (Josh) who claims to be the legatee of Bhag Singh has tried to dig up the dead issues and is conspiring against the concept of Hukamnamas.Dr. Man Singh Nirankari is also one of the prominent members of this group. He is not only openly advocating and writing against the Nitnem and Ardas of the Khalsa but is also spreading the blasphemous canard that the gurus also had the ‘mundan’ ceremony."

In view of this, the Confederation calls upon the Sri Akal Takhat Sahib and the SGPC to take note of this blasphemous statement given by the Spokesman and take strict action according to the Pan

thik traditions.

The confederation also brings this to the notice of the authorities for taking action against the write-up of the Spokesman which is nothing but an attempt to hurt the religious feelings of the Sikhs and has the potential of disturbing the peace and tranquility of the society. The press statement has been issued under the names of Tarlochan Singh, president and Jagjit Singh Gabba, president of the Confederation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest mehtab

if only we cud bring back abdali, zakariya khan, mir mannu,nadir shah, bahadur shah, farrukhsiyar, aurangzeb, wazir khan back to life and ask them how they feel about Sikhs. the writer of this article would find them shivering to death and might think of making changes in the piece of garbage he wrote :umm: :umm: :D @ :@ @

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest balwinderkaur
if only we cud bring back abdali, zakariya khan, mir mannu,nadir shah, bahadur shah, farrukhsiyar, aurangzeb, wazir khan back to life and ask them how they feel about Sikhs. the writer of this article would find them shivering to death and might think of making changes in the piece of garbage he wrote   

soooooooooo true rochak bhai :umm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use