Jump to content

Un Feedback Suggests World Sikh Lobby Is Making A Significant Impact


Recommended Posts

UN FEEDBACK SUGGESTS WORLD SIKH LOBBY IS MAKING A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

In the last 4 weeks Sikhs from the UK, Canada, USA, Switzerland, Germany, Italy, Belgium and Netherlands that took part in the World Sikh Lobby in Geneva on 14 March have as promised continued dialogue with around ten UN Special Rapporteurs and Independent Experts. Apart from the successful meetings that took place that day there have been many written exchanges and talks.

The most significant exchanges have taken place with the Special Rapporteur for Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance and the Special Rapporteur for the Human Rights of Indigenous People. The Special Rapporteur for Torture and Special Rapporteur for Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary executions have also asked for meetings in New York.

On 10 April a meeting took place in Geneva with the assistant to the Special Rapporteur on human rights while countering terrorism. Sikh representatives were informed that the World Sikh Lobby in Geneva on 14 March had proved very productive and led to the entire team working for the Special Rapporteurs to meet and assess how the information provided by Sikhs from across the globe could be put to best use in the context of India.

Sikh representatives at the meeting included Kuldip Singh Chaheru, Balbir Singh, Dabinderjit Singh, Master Karan Singh and Harminder Singh Khalsa. The meeting commenced with Sikh representatives reiterating that India was the only country that did not support the resolution at the UN General Assembly regarding the protection of human rights while countering terrorism. This highlighted a fundamental weakness in India's respect for and approach to human rights.

In the meeting that lasted over an hour the Sikh delegation discussed India’s continued widespread use of draconian anti-terror legislation against Sikhs. It was mentioned the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act (TADA), which expired in 1995 and which Nigel Rodley, the UN Rapporteur condemned as "disturbing and completely unacceptable” continues to be used to hold political prisoners.

The Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA), enacted in March 2002, which replaced the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO) in 2001 was also referred to. POTA allows for the detention without charge for 3 months, and 3 more months if allowed by a special judge, deems not disclosing information to the authorities about terrorist activities an offence, and provides extensive new powers to ban organisations and seize their assets. It was pointed out the act is similar to TADA in its provisions for detentions, summary trials, and the use of testimony obtained under duress. In addition, POTA provides for special courts to try offences, places the burden of proof at the bail stage on the accused, allows confessions made to a police officer admissible as evidence, extends the period of remand from 15 to 60 days, and sets mandatory sentences for terrorism-related offences.

The false cases against Professor Davinderpal Singh Bhullar, Balbir Singh Bains and Paramjit Singh Dhaddi were discussed in the context of counter-terrorism along with the extensive use of police cats by the Indian authorities to kill innocents and discredit the Sikh freedom movement. The practices of successive Director Generals of Police in Punjab, such as, the bullet for bullet policy were mentioned. UN officials requested details of specific cases that the Rapporteur could use to have a dialogue with the Indian authorities that could then be used to request a special investigation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a very inspiring post.

Pro-active

Positive action

Want something positive to happen in the world, compound it into a tetanus with more positive action potentials.

This is a positive action potential

"God keep our land glorious and free" - Canadian anthem

"The Khalsa belongs to God, To God belongs Victory"

"To God belongs the Khalsa, may its Spirit remain Glorious and Free, and Truth be Victorious"

Gurfateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UN FEEDBACK SUGGESTS WORLD SIKH LOBBY IS MAKING A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

In the last 4 weeks Sikhs from the UK, Canada, USA, Switzerland, Germany, Italy, Belgium and Netherlands that took part in the World Sikh Lobby in Geneva on 14 March have as promised continued dialogue with around ten UN Special Rapporteurs and Independent Experts. Apart from the successful meetings that took place that day there have been many written exchanges and talks.

The most significant exchanges have taken place with the Special Rapporteur for Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance and the Special Rapporteur for the Human Rights of Indigenous People. The Special Rapporteur for Torture and Special Rapporteur for Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary executions have also asked for meetings in New York.

On 10 April a meeting took place in Geneva with the assistant to the Special Rapporteur on human rights while countering terrorism. Sikh representatives were informed that the World Sikh Lobby in Geneva on 14 March had proved very productive and led to the entire team working for the Special Rapporteurs to meet and assess how the information provided by Sikhs from across the globe could be put to best use in the context of India.

Sikh representatives at the meeting included Kuldip Singh Chaheru, Balbir Singh, Dabinderjit Singh, Master Karan Singh and Harminder Singh Khalsa. The meeting commenced with Sikh representatives reiterating that India was the only country that did not support the resolution at the UN General Assembly regarding the protection of human rights while countering terrorism. This highlighted a fundamental weakness in India's respect for and approach to human rights.

In the meeting that lasted over an hour the Sikh delegation discussed India’s continued widespread use of draconian anti-terror legislation against Sikhs. It was mentioned the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act (TADA), which expired in 1995 and which Nigel Rodley, the UN Rapporteur condemned as "disturbing and completely unacceptable” continues to be used to hold political prisoners.

The Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA), enacted in March 2002, which replaced the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO) in 2001 was also referred to. POTA allows for the detention without charge for 3 months, and 3 more months if allowed by a special judge, deems not disclosing information to the authorities about terrorist activities an offence, and provides extensive new powers to ban organisations and seize their assets. It was pointed out the act is similar to TADA in its provisions for detentions, summary trials, and the use of testimony obtained under duress. In addition, POTA provides for special courts to try offences, places the burden of proof at the bail stage on the accused, allows confessions made to a police officer admissible as evidence, extends the period of remand from 15 to 60 days, and sets mandatory sentences for terrorism-related offences.

The false cases against Professor Davinderpal Singh Bhullar, Balbir Singh Bains and Paramjit Singh Dhaddi were discussed in the context of counter-terrorism along with the extensive use of police cats by the Indian authorities to kill innocents and discredit the Sikh freedom movement. The practices of successive Director Generals of Police in Punjab, such as, the bullet for bullet policy were mentioned. UN officials requested details of specific cases that the Rapporteur could use to have a dialogue with the Indian authorities that could then be used to request a special investigation.

http://www.ajitjalandhar.com/20080414/

First item in rashtri / antrashtri

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UN FEEDBACK SUGGESTS WORLD SIKH LOBBY IS MAKING A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

In the last 4 weeks Sikhs from the UK, Canada, USA, Switzerland, Germany, Italy, Belgium and Netherlands that took part in the World Sikh Lobby in Geneva on 14 March have as promised continued dialogue with around ten UN Special Rapporteurs and Independent Experts. Apart from the successful meetings that took place that day there have been many written exchanges and talks.

The most significant exchanges have taken place with the Special Rapporteur for Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance and the Special Rapporteur for the Human Rights of Indigenous People. The Special Rapporteur for Torture and Special Rapporteur for Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary executions have also asked for meetings in New York.

On 10 April a meeting took place in Geneva with the assistant to the Special Rapporteur on human rights while countering terrorism. Sikh representatives were informed that the World Sikh Lobby in Geneva on 14 March had proved very productive and led to the entire team working for the Special Rapporteurs to meet and assess how the information provided by Sikhs from across the globe could be put to best use in the context of India.

Sikh representatives at the meeting included Kuldip Singh Chaheru, Balbir Singh, Dabinderjit Singh, Master Karan Singh and Harminder Singh Khalsa. The meeting commenced with Sikh representatives reiterating that India was the only country that did not support the resolution at the UN General Assembly regarding the protection of human rights while countering terrorism. This highlighted a fundamental weakness in India's respect for and approach to human rights.

In the meeting that lasted over an hour the Sikh delegation discussed India’s continued widespread use of draconian anti-terror legislation against Sikhs. It was mentioned the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act (TADA), which expired in 1995 and which Nigel Rodley, the UN Rapporteur condemned as "disturbing and completely unacceptable” continues to be used to hold political prisoners.

The Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA), enacted in March 2002, which replaced the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO) in 2001 was also referred to. POTA allows for the detention without charge for 3 months, and 3 more months if allowed by a special judge, deems not disclosing information to the authorities about terrorist activities an offence, and provides extensive new powers to ban organisations and seize their assets. It was pointed out the act is similar to TADA in its provisions for detentions, summary trials, and the use of testimony obtained under duress. In addition, POTA provides for special courts to try offences, places the burden of proof at the bail stage on the accused, allows confessions made to a police officer admissible as evidence, extends the period of remand from 15 to 60 days, and sets mandatory sentences for terrorism-related offences.

The false cases against Professor Davinderpal Singh Bhullar, Balbir Singh Bains and Paramjit Singh Dhaddi were discussed in the context of counter-terrorism along with the extensive use of police cats by the Indian authorities to kill innocents and discredit the Sikh freedom movement. The practices of successive Director Generals of Police in Punjab, such as, the bullet for bullet policy were mentioned. UN officials requested details of specific cases that the Rapporteur could use to have a dialogue with the Indian authorities that could then be used to request a special investigation.

Article also in Ajdiawaz

http://www.ajdiawaaz.com/ajdiawaaz_itsilve...;id=12444256215

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use