Chardi Kala Rehatnamey

[apne]

Qualify this statement.

How are they foolish?

You have no idea how much knowledge I may or may not have. If my argument is 'stupid', show me how.

If you can't, then you will just look like an imbecile.

You think i care?

[Muzumdar]

You think i care?

You cared enough to comment in the first place.

Allow me to demonstrate the flaw in your argument with a historical argument. You say that the Gurus gave corporal authority to the Panj Pyare and the Akal Takht.

1919 Jallianwala Bagh, General Dyer guns down hunders of mainly Sikh peaceful protesters.

What do the Panj Pyare at the Akal Takht do? Give Dyer a Saropa and honour him at Darbar Sahib.

My point? That the Panj Pyare don't always get it right, which is why referring to Gurbani is always important.

[apne]

You cared enough to comment in the first place.

Allow me to demonstrate the flaw in your argument with a historical argument. You say that the Gurus gave corporal authority to the Panj Pyare and the Akal Takht.

1919 Jallianwala Bagh, General Dyer guns down hunders of mainly Sikh peaceful protesters.

What do the Panj Pyare at the Akal Takht do? Give Dyer a Saropa and honour him at Darbar Sahib.

My point? That the Panj Pyare don't always get it right, which is why referring to Gurbani is always important.

Is that all you have to offer as an argument? Pathetic. Read my comment again, until you are able to understand what i said.

[Muzumdar]

Is that all you have to offer as an argument? Pathetic. Read my comment again, until you are able to understand what i said.

Do you have no sense of manners or civility?

You said:

There is no need to find support of a rahit maryada in Guru Granth Sahib

becuase:

Guru Gobind Singh had given corporal authority to Khalsa Panth too in the form of panj piare.

I disagreed with you on the point of not needing to find support for Rehit in the Guru Granth Sahib. I told you why.

You were unable to respond, probably because your critical faculties are non-existent, so you decided to throw names and insults about. It is a typical response from a person who, being unable to cope with an intellectual conversation, resorts to desperate attacks.

I think it is you who needs to do some reading.

[apne]

Is that all you have to offer as an argument? Pathetic. Read my comment again, until you are able to understand what i said.

Do you have no sense of manners or civility?

You said:

There is no need to find support of a rahit maryada in Guru Granth Sahib

becuase:

Guru Gobind Singh had given corporal authority to Khalsa Panth too in the form of panj piare.

I disagreed with you on the point of not needing to find support for Rehit in the Guru Granth Sahib. I told you why.

You were unable to respond, probably because your critical faculties are non-existent, so you decided to throw names and insults about. It is a typical response from a person who, being unable to cope with an intellectual conversation, resorts to desperate attacks.

I think it is you who needs to do some reading.

is that all? i am not impressed enough to answer! why do you think that is?