The Biggest Danger To India Alias Brahmins Autocracy

[SaRpAnCh]

Got this in an email:

The Biggest Danger to India alias Brahmins autocracy/Zamhooriat/Zulamhooriat alias the alleged Indian Democracy?

Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon,

Acing Editor in Chief, Int. Journal of Sikh Affairs ISSN 1481-5435

In his interview with WSJ, President Zardari said that India has never been a danger to Pakistan. The people of Pakistan disagree. However, the ruling elite (Brahmins and pro-Brahmins who are mere 15% of the population) of India is celebrating. Like Sheikh Mujib ur Rehman of East Pakistan in 1971, they believe Asif Zardari would deliver them similar success. The oppressed majority of India – the Untouchables, the Muslims, the Sikhs and the Christians are aghast in disbelief, however. They look up to Pakistan as their role model and potential ally. The rise of Mr Ten Percent (10%) makes them sad; they hope the nightmare of Pakistan would be brief. What follows is the writing of one well-wisher of Pakistan from Canada.

India is not and can never be one nation. The British rulers recognized that their colony in India/Brahmins autocracy/Zamhooriat/Zulamhooriat or the ‘Democracy of Deceits, Propaganda and Fraud’ alias the alleged Indian democracy or had many nations and that the sub-continent had been united only under imperial rule. The Muslims/Mughals ruled the sub-continent for 800 years. They were followed by British for 100 to 200 years - longer in the South and the East but shorter in the West and the North. The Sikhs replaced the Muslims as imperial power in the Punjab and Kashmir just prior to the British conquest and were the first ‘Sovereign and Secular nation – The Sikh Raj, 1799 to 14th March, 1849. India flourished under foreign rule because all the imperial powers were harbingers of egalitarianism; whereas, the Brahmanism is the only (pseudo) faith founded on the notion of ‘inequality’ – people being born unequal carrying the burden of the past life/lives. That is why Hindu kingdoms never lasted more than fifty to sixty years that too over a portion of the territory that is India today.

The Muslim rulers enforced the Shriah that protected the right of non-Muslims to practices their faith freely. The British enforced universal laws (except personal laws); they also gave political rights to faith and caste communities taking note of their separateness of religious and caste communities who did not inter-marry and practiced Unsociability. Thus, the British set up a system that was unique in giving recognition - rights as well as representation - to the Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs) and Other Backward Castes (OBCs) who had been wrongly lumped with the Hindus. Under Minto Morley Reforms of 1905, they gave the peoples of India Separate Electorate – a brilliant scheme that recognized the diversity of India and also provide a firm underpinning for the political unity of India. In 1932, under the Communal Award, the British offered Separate Electorate to all the faith and caste communities for elections to state and the federal assemblies. But it was only the Muslims who, under the far-sighted leadership of Janab MA Jinnah, accepted the Award.

The Brahmin-Bania clique led by so called Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was able to dissuade all the other faith and caste communities to reject the Communal Award, which they now regret. Janab Jinnah made fervent appeals to the leaders of the Sikhs and the Untouchables to accept the Communal Award. Dr B.R. Ambedkar, leader of the Untouchables, rejected the British offer of Separate Electorate. He signed the infamous Poona Pact of 1932 with M K. Gandhi under which he accepted ‘reservations’ – quotas in education and jobs - instead of the rights, above all the right of self-determination. All the minority faiths and low castes now recognize that rejection of Separate Electorate was a blunder that has helped the Brahmin entrench as the ruling class reducing all the others to being beggars fighting each other for share of crumbs from the High caste Hindu table.

In 1946, under the Cabinet Mission Plan, the British made the last effort to keep India united as a confederation of three states – two Muslim majority states comprising the provinces in the East and the West, and a state comprising non-Muslim majority provinces in the middle. The institution of Separate Electorate provided the glue for the unity of the confederation. Janab Jinnah accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan on behalf of the Muslims of India. Jawahar Lal (JL) Nehru, in his usual devious manner, first accepted the plan and then said: “any deal made before transfer of power would not be binding on the parliament of sovereign India”. That drew the rejection of the Plan by the Muslim League as the Congress leaders expected. India was eventually partitioned on the basis of ‘Muslim majority contiguous areas’ and the provinces of the Punjab, Bengal and Assam ended up being partitioned. Janab MA Jinnah had offered the Sikhs their own separate state – Khalistan, The Sikh Nation – if they did not go along with the Brahmin-Bania led by the Congress Party (of the Hindus/Brahmins) and the partition of the Punjab was thus avoided. But alas, the leader of the (deceitful and Sikhs’ traitor) Sikh leader of the Akali Dal – Master Tara Singh (a backstabber of the ‘uncrowned’ king of the Sikhs, Baba Kharak Singh; please see Ram Singh’s Master Tara Singh da Sikh Qaum Naal Visahghat in Punjabi and English mixed from the United Kingdom) – accepted a similar offer made by MK Gandhi and his Hindu followers, thus making the same mistake as did Dr Ambedkar. The country called India is the product of betrayal - betrayal by Brahmin-Bania clique (Brahmins and pro-Brahmins) and the Untouchable majority, the Sikh minority as well. Betrayal is a legitimate weapon of statecraft in the Brahmin Raj Niti (the Brahmins, Manu and Shankryacharya doctrines). The Muslims of Pakistan are fortunate that their leader did not trust the Brahmin and/or the Bania; Janab Jinnah, later known as the Father of Pakistan, along with his staunch supporters and advisors. Pakistan is free and sovereign today because of the wisdom and far sightedness of that truly great man - the ‘father of the nation’ who the Pakistanis rightly call Quaid e Azam.

Mr Jinnah is also a model for the Non-Hindu majority of India, the Bahujan ( a combination of two words: Bahu and jan; Bahu means several or multi and jan means the people), which includes the Untouchable castes, the Muslims, the Sikhs and the Christians. They are shocked by the disgraceful statement of President Asif Zardari, commonly known as Mr 10% Zardari. The irony is that he sits on the same seat which was occupied the great and pious statesman, Janab Jinnah. He seems to have no idea of the central role of the Muslims in obtaining freedom from British rule while the Congress leaders (the Hindus, who are neither a religion nor a culture) were active collaborators of the raj as revealed in the book “Tandev of the Centaur” by Professor Gurtej Singh published by the London Institute of South Asia (LISA). Janab Jinnah was a symbol of dignity that made not just the Muslims but all the oppressed people of India proud. He was never on the wrong side of the law; he was never incarcerated; nobody ever dared throw mud at him. He never wanted anything for the Muslims that he was not willing to, give to every other oppressed or minority people. Above all, he understood the Hindu mind and psyche; he never trusted the Brahmin-Bania clique of the Congress Party. India of today has been in existence for just over sixty-one years and it is breaking up as it seams; nothing can stop that. Mr (10%) Zardari is neither aware of history nor of the current situation in South Asia. He seems to be under the spell of India like a filmgoer in a trance on seeing near naked dancing girls in a Bombay (Bollywood) movie industry’s production of the Indian movie industry. The industry which is notorious for destructing the history and culture of the non-Hindus, especially the Sikhs of Punjab (under Indian occupation since 15th August, 1947).

Let me tell him what India is really like. India has crossed the watershed of sixty-one years of Brahmin-Bania rule. The Sikhs in the Punjab, the Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir, and the tribal peoples of the Seven Sisters of Assam are up in arms demanding separation from India. The Untouchables – Dalits as well as the Tribals – want to change the system and are no longer prepared to live in bondage of the Brahmin-Bania rulers of India. Their movements have different names in different states but their objective is the same. The Maoists and Naxalite are the most well known movements, which hold sway over nearly 50 percent of India from Kerala in the south running diagonally across India to the state of Bengal. India relies on the following to keep itself together:

1. Control of the news (newspapers, airwaves, television channels, etc.) of the many insurrections in India. The Indian media only tells how many were killed, not were they killed or what they are fighting for?

2. Hesitation of leaders of Pakistan to condemn India’s excesses against itself and other neighbours including violation of treaties- water treaties or the water and natural resources of the Sikhs of Punjab, in particular. The Pakistani leaders and media often talk of the ‘progress’ being made by India blissfully unaware of the stink and filth, the hunger and destitution, and the repression and deprivation of the Bahujan who are 85% of the population of over 1.2 billion hungry mouths of India.

3. The crumbling of the resolve in the political class of Pakistan to give moral support to the Bahujan who look up to Pakistan.

4. Allowing India to drag its feet with impunity in negotiations thus giving it time to create ‘new facts’ and coin ‘new interpretations’ to go back on agreements made in the past.

India is very assertive – even aggressive and oppressive – in its dealings with other countries particularly its neighbours. When cornered, its stock answer is, “ It is not willing to take any lessons from former imperialists’. That line discredits all past and present imperialists and gives carte blanche to the neo-imperialist pretender to the title of the ‘largest democracy’ and the ‘oldest continuous civilization’. Every person in India is taught to slight others and cockily assert that its very longevity is the proof that it is the best. Even the USA is willing to go along with that ‘line’. The message is clear: If India can manipulate the USA what chance does a neighbour, a minority faith like the followers of the Sikhism, or untouchables castes have against the Brahmin-Bania masters? So, ‘go belly up and relax!’

The Bahujan know they can expect no help from the outside. The lesson of history is that every past Hindu kingdom imploded within sixty years of its foundation. The truly great empires that lasted long were founded by converts - Emperor Ashoka embraced Buddhism; Slave Dynasty of Muslim converts led Muslim rule of India for 800 hundred years. The Punjabi Sikh rebellion against Brahmanism (in conform with the teachings of the founder of the Sikh religion, Baba Guru Nanak Sahib), which is the foundation of the Sikh faith, led to the emergence of the Sikh Empire. It is hard to say what form would the liberation of India take now that the present day Hindu Empire has already past its 60-year life span. Different scholars have expressed different opinions. Is the biggest danger to India the Brahmin autocracy itself? Does the seed of its destruction lie in the raj-niti based on the code of Manu, the politics of Kautaliya and the ruthlessness of Shankracharya (who is credited with the biggest massacre in history - of the Buddhists)? The implosion of India is bound to have features of the past it treasures and the teachings of the gurus it glorifies. That leads to the conclusion that in a curious way, their newfound friend, Asif Zardari (Mr 10%), may turn out to be a threat; he could encourage India to invade Pakistan?

Indian leaders (Brahmins and pro-Brahmins) are on record saying in 1947 that Pakistan was unviable and would soon be begging to return to the Indian fold. That did not happen because of wise leaders of Pakistan and the goodwill of the Muslim World. But the Brahmin-Bania leadership is still hopeful. Their hopes have risen because Pakistanis do not blame India for the break-up of their country in 1971. India is hopeful because Indophiles and their ‘friends’ are leaders of political parties in Pakistan. They are hopeful because they have international support for efforts to balkanize Pakistan. They are hopeful because their friend, Asif Zardari, is the new leader in Pakistan. India is not going to give up its objectives, however. East Pakistan could have fallen like a ripe apple in the lap of India after Sheikh Mujib ur Rehman won a resounding victory; it still preferred to inflict a military defeat on Pakistan. India did not have to destroy the Darbar Sahib Complex (mistakenly called the Golden Temple Complex), the Punjab of the Sikhs, Sikhs’ Holy and historic homeland, or engage in a systematic massacre of the Sikhs in 1984 and thereafter. But it did. That is the Raj-Neti taught to them by their Machiavellian masters; that is do it by the hook or by the crook. That is why the President of Pakistan being their friend would only whet their appetite and they will accelerate their plans to bring Pakistan back in the Indian fold.

The Pakistanis could learn from the experience of the Sikhs, the slaves of the Brahmins and pro-Brahmins since 15th August, 1947. We were in the forefront of the freedom struggle of the Sikhs for their Sikh Raj, but the Brahmins and pro-Brahmins of India high jacked the Sikhs’ struggle for sovereignty and gave the name of India’s freedom struggle. The Sikhs made the most sacrifices and the Hindus who had been the ‘subservient’ of the Afghans, Mughals, the Sikhs, the British, Portuguese, etc., became the masters of the Sikhs’ Punjab and elsewhere in of the princely Hindu kingdoms. These have been the deceits and broken promises of MK Gandhi and his Hindu colleagues. We were at the heart of the British Indian Army and then of the Indian Army. Yet, India inflicted the ultimate humiliation on us when it used Sikh soldiers and policemen, Sikh Officers in the Army, Navy and Air Force, and the Police for the raid on Darbar Sahib and wanton massacre of the Sikhs in 1984 and later. Brahmin-Bania micro-minority (only less than 15% of the total population of India) rules India by shear ruthlessness. It tramples over friends and foes alike when its hegemony comes under threat. India fears the Sikhs because of the martial characteristics of our people. We are not ready to overlook and forget the crimes of the Indian State against us. How can we forget that India went as far as blowing up Indian Airlines Flight 182 off the western coast of Ireland just to malign the Sikhs as shown conclusively in the Book SOFT TARGET by Zuhair Kashmeri & Brian McAndrew. The Diaspora Sikhs have relentlessly exposed the crimes of India against their people. The hijacking of Kathmandu-Kabul flight of Indian Airlines in the late 1990s was a false flag operation of RAW (India’s Research and Analysis Wing). An elaborate plan to blow up Air India aircraft was aborted after the press got to know of the meeting of plotters held in a Rome hotel in 1994, in which representatives of RAW, CSIS from Canada, Italy, Germany, the UK and the USA, with two turbaned (dastaardhari) Hindus from the HQ in India.

Ever since the Party of Mr 10 % formed the new administration and a criminal mafia took control of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, India has cracked down over Kashmiris with impunity without fear. Muslims homes have been torched and occupants burnt alive with relish ever since India became ‘free’. Now even the Christians have become targets. Parliamentary democracy has become a joke. In India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, the political parties are no more than criminal mafias and the cabinet members their abettors and protectors. The Sikhs are migrating overseas in ever-larger numbers and Biharis are taking their place. The Indian state is still continuing its tried and tested method of setting one community against the other. Lately, the Muslims became the targets of the Bodo tribe. All Muslims are called Bangladeshis in North East India. They are under threat of being hunted every time resistance to Indian occupation becomes stiffer. Ironically, but befittingly, the hounded of all faiths raise the flag of Pakistan when their homes are raided and torched by the Indian Army.

The litany of death and destruction inflicted by India since 15th August 1947 is long. Pakistan has fought India over Kashmir in 1948-49, in 1965 and in 1999 at Kargil. In 1971, Pakistan was invaded by India and ‘dismembered’. Since “Operation Bluestar” of June 1984, Indian armed forces have killed nearly 2.5 millions Sikhs (3.2 to 3.4 million since 15th August, 1947). More than 500,000 Muslims have been killed in communal riots in India and 110, 000 Muslims have been killed by the security forces in Jammu and Kashmir since 1988. The Tamil insurrection claimed 15,000 lives. The number of Christians killed in India is close to 312,500; excluding the murder of Father Stains of Australia, his two sons, the rape and murder of Roman Catholic Nuns or the recent killings of Christians in Orissa, the Punjab and Karnataka.

Mr (10%) Zardari is on the wrong side of his own people having failed to restore the Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry despite promise before the elections and written agreements with coalition partners. He lost the trust of the people even before he contested the elections to become the President of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. His election to the office of the President has brought discredit to democracy in general and democracy in Pakistan in particular. That he is courting those, who the people of Pakistan consider their enemies, compromises the ‘Sovereignty’ of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The peoples denied their right to self-determination by India look up to Pakistan for help and as a model. They hope and pray that 10% Zardari rule is short and the damage he inflicts is temporary and reversible.

*****

[Harvinder singh Babbar]

good read sarpanch, thanks.