Jump to content

History Of Panjab


Khalasthan86
 Share

Recommended Posts

Is it true that, before the British raj on India, Panjab was a different country, and then when the British left, they handed over Panjab to India?

:umm:

I think it would be more accurate to say the position of Sikhs in the Panjab (and surrouding areas) was markedly different pre and post British occupation.

Prior to the "annexation" Sikhs were the primary power in the region under Maharajah Ranjit Singh. The essentially ruled themselves and had a well trained, independant and modern army. They also managed to create a feeling of loyalty from nonSikh Panjabis in the empire. So they assimilated lots of different cultures.

By the time the British decided to leave, the position was radically altered. Sikhs became (in my mind) a relatively powerless minority and the Panjab changed from being an open minded, cosmopolitan place to one with dangerous sectarian impulses as seen by the wholesale murder that took place at partition. The position of the Sikhs militarily also dwindled with only those who patronised the British army being promoted. This meant that they were unable to prevent the ghallugara that took place and everyday people had to resort to militia type resistance to survive the creation of Pakistan. Politically, the British introduced democracy which gave power based on numerical representation and Sikhs (being much smaller in numbers than others) lost out to that. Prior to this rule was established with bravery and military might. This is what secured Panjab from Afghan/Persian invasions after centuries of enduring these.

A mixture of patriotic feelings towards an idealised India (which some feel was out of place today) and the stark reality of ascending Muslim strength, they chose to throw their lot with India and Panjab was transformed from a bustling, adventerous, expanding Kingdom to a volatile border region. Subsequently India chopped up Panjab even further into Haryana etc.

Basically, Sikhs/Singhs/Panjabis lost their sovereignity and military strength under the British. That's one opinion anyway. (A bit grim I know! lol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before british, punjab was different and very developed country just like afghanistan before russian invasion. Punjab was from Khyber Pass (Afghanistan) to Nepal (includes all Himalayas) and then from J&K till Rajasthan. It was HUGE country. We had our own departments; interior, defense, welfare and so on.. Bijla Singh (User of sikhsangat) did detailed research on this subject and will be writing some articles for searchsikhism.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use