Jump to content

Cia And British Military Intelligence Double Dealing In Libya


genie
 Share

Recommended Posts

It has emerged that double dealing British Military Intelligence and CIA units in Libya were giving information about dissidents who opposed Cornell gaddaffi's rule. They were inclusion with his government since 2003. Back in 1996 Mi6 tried to assassinate Cornell Gadaffi by using Islamic Jihadi rebels the same ones they are supporting now, as you can see they double crossed gadaffi but also in the process had many innocent civilians murdered indirectly and directly due to their involvement. This is a clear cut case of state terrorism sadly from our own western governments laid bare for the world to see it has made the British government and establishment look corrupt at the core.

In regards to Sikh's, those Sikh nationalists who wish to see a Khalistan established from or within the Indian Union need to be careful who they deal with politically as you can see the snake like intelligence agencies operating in this manor. One day they could be your best friends and another they would be secretly passing on intelligence to have you or your family and friends harmed. These are the dark shadow terrorists that lie behind most governments. And our leaders should be wise to see them for what they are and take political steps to ensure that the voice for freedom, self determination is not allowed to be silenced overtly or covertly. Indian Union is an economic power house and soon to be super power, the west want influence to benefit their economies so they will try and curb activities of dissidents, separatists and human right activities in order to appease the Indian government. In the meanwhile they will be plotting to have the Indian union government undermined, by various methods (one of them is by supporting Pakistan financially also ISI is british establishment creation Intelligence institution at the expense of the Indian Union).

Just how they broke up the Sikh empire, the same methods they are employing in the world today. They keep their enemies closer so that they can back stab them when the time arises as Gadaffi found out to his cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Under Gadaffi Libya was a rising super power with the ability to lift Africa out of the poverty and debt trap the west had put it. You can see why it had to be taken down by any means necessary by the western establishments. Gadaffi hated the islamist jihadi's who wanted to set up their own khalifat state which is against the interests of all apart from a few mullah nutters.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use