Jump to content

Molecular biologist finds evidence of a 'God gene'


mehar singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

You may need to register at the website in order to view the URL webpage.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bergen Record – Thursday December 2, 2004 - Religion Page L-7

http://www.bergenrecord.com/page.ppa?qstr=...UVFeXk2NjE5NjAy

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Molecular biologist finds evidence of a 'God gene'

Thursday, December 2, 2004

By DEAN HAME

RRELIGION NEWS SERVICE

.

Since the dawn of our species, spirituality has been deeply woven into the human experience.

Why is spirituality such a universal force? Why do people from all walks of life, regardless of their religious backgrounds, value spirituality as much as, or more than, pleasure, power and wealth?

The answer is, at least in part, hard-wired into our genes. Spirituality is one of our basic human inheritances. It is, in short, an instinct - rooted in a "God gene" folded deep in the intricate strands of our DNA.

Non-believers will argue that finding a God gene proves there is no God - that religion is nothing more than a genetic program for self-deception. Believers, on the other hand, can point to the existence of God genes as one more sign of the creator's ingenuity.

But these arguments mix theology with neurobiology. The one thing we know for certain about spiritual beliefs and feelings is that they are products of the brain - the firing of electrochemical currents through networks of nerve cells.

Understan

ding how such thoughts and emotions are formed and propagated is something science can tackle. Whether the beliefs are true or false is not. Spirituality ultimately is a matter of faith, not of genetics.

Proving a link between our genes and spirituality is not a simple task. I have been exploring this subject for years, independent of my work as a geneticist at the National Institutes of Health, and I have concluded that proof, in a case like this, depends on the whole array of evidence.

The first challenge in my research was to work out a way to measure spiritual feelings and not just traditional religious activity. This is an important distinction, because people who are involved in their church, mosque or temple are not necessarily spiritual, and deeply spiritual people are sometimes skeptical of organized religion.

For this, I used a scale called "self-transcendence," developed by the innovative psychologist Robert Cloninger, which provides a numerical measure of people's capacity to reach out beyond themselves - to see everything in the world as part of one great totality.

Based on Cloninger's criteria, Mohandas Gandhi and Albert Einstein would score highly; Genghis Khan would not. This might seem flaky, but it passes the test for a solid psychological trait.

The second step was to determine if spirituality is inherited, and if so to what extent. This was tackled by comparing identical twins, who have the exact same genes, to fraternal twins, who are only as genetically similar as ordinary siblings.

Data collected by scientists in the United States and Australia show that spirituality, as measured by the self-transcendence scale, is indeed significantly heritable. The extent of genetic influence is similar to that for many personality traits, and even greater than it is for some physical characteristics.

By contrast, the shared cultural environment, such as Sunday school, sermons and parenting, had little effect on spirituality - even though they were

major factors in more traditional religious views such as belief in the Bible.

The third step was to search for specific genes involved in spirituality. By comparing self-transcendence scores with DNA patterns, one such "God gene" stood out. It's called VMAT2, and it is linked to a protein that controls the amount of crucial brain-signaling chemicals. Interestingly, these same brain chemicals can be triggered by certain drugs that can bring about mystical-like experiences.

VMAT2 is by no means the entire story behind spirituality. It has only a small, if key, role; many other genes and environmental factors also are involved. Nevertheless, the gene is important because it points out the mechanism by which spirituality plays out in the brain.

Exploring this mechanism was the fourth step of my research. The chemicals controlled by the God gene - known as monoamines - have many functions in the brain. They appear to influence spirituality by altering consciousness, which can be broadly defined as our sense of reality - our awareness of ourselves and the universe around us, including our thoughts, memories and perceptions.

The hallmark of mystical experiences, such as Saul experienced on the road to Damascus and Jesus underwent in the desert, are alterations in consciousness. According to a theory developed by the Nobel Prize-winning scientist Gerald Edelman, the key role of monoamines with regard to consciousness is to link objects and experiences with emotions and values.

The final step was to account for the evolution of God genes. If Charles Darwin was right and natural selection favors some traits over others, what reasons can we find for the persistence of human spirituality?

This is a matter for educated guesses, rather than exact science. But one of the important roles that God genes may play in natural selection is to provide human beings with an innate sense of optimism. At the psychological level, optimism is the will to keep on living and procreating, despite

the fact that death is ultimately inevitable.

At the physical level, studies show that optimism seems to promote better health and quicker recovery from disease, advantages that would help us to live long enough to have and raise children and pass on our genetic heritage.

There is a tendency to pit science and spirituality (or religion) against each other as if they were intrinsic enemies. They are not. As Einstein famously commented, "Religion without science is blind; science without religion is lame."

-----------------

Dean Hamer, a Harvard-trained geneticist, is author of "The God Gene: How Faith Is Hardwired Into Our Genes" (Doubleday, $24.95).

Copyright © 2004 North Jersey Media Group Inc.

Copyright Infringement Notice User Agreement & Privacy Policy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actaully that's a hoax. I have read Hamer's findings.

Many reasearches come out in public to create stir and gain importance. Hamer was the same person who once said he has found a gay gene which was later proved to be false.

Most of the reaserches media and particularly people/researchers flame it to look like "truth".

There is nothing known as what Hamer is again saying. Talking about hamer if that is true than how come 50% of world today is Athiest than it was never before.

If you see the media and people who want to read what they have, even if it is not worth.

they write

"Molecular biologist finds evidence of a 'God gene'"

Look at the phrase, I mean trust me people are programmed today by media and government to read and accept what comes on a white paper with black letters on it as true.

Where is our Guru Sahib? Do we listen to them.

I am a biology major and It is a routine to hear about reasearches which are exaggerated and then proven not even stand on the subject line.

There is good article written By Scietific American debunking his findings.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID...02F83414B7F4945

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

If there is such a gene, its probably a gene that, when expressed, increases the ability of the person to concentrate. Since religion requires concentration, those who can concentrate better are more likely to be involved in religion!

lol. interesting idea though... :wub:

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use