Jump to content

KHALISTAN


manpreet
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

True, the wealthy businessmen might support Khalistan, if there are any financial benefits, but influencing the politicians is another story...Especially politicians in the West, who for the most part, view the Khalistan movement as a violent one due to some unfortunate incidences in the past....But you're defenitely right on one note, we need to hold a significant amount of the World's capital flows, and economy to get noticed, something that the Jews are pretty good at....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was having a conversation with my dad today about it.. i'm neither pro nor con...

different issues arise:

1) water... where would we get our water from? we would have no access to the Indian Ocean and all the 5 rivers of Punjab are so badly polluted, that can't even be an option. water treatment plants would be sooooooooooooooooo expensive to deal with that kind of polluted water.

2) Electrical Infrastructure... we'd almost have to start from scratch for electrical power.

3) geography... we'd have enemies on each and every side of us, especially if khalistan is created by violent means. Sure, we're Khalsa, and we're warriors and everything.. but step back for a second and look at this logically.. Where would we get the cash to build and sustain a powerful army to go up against the likes of Pakistan who more often than not would be enemies, and India, which would be more often than not, also be enemies.

4) Production... Not everything required can be produced in our Khalistan. As fruitful as Punjab is, there isn't the potential to produce everything. This means importation and exportation.. and you know what that means.. going the cheapest route... our neighbours, pakistan and india.

5) what to do with the 45% of hindus in the province?? kick them out? hence, steal their land, their assets, essentially.. similar to what happened in 1947... this means the same thing happens to sikhs all over india whom are not in punjab. it'd be a civil war. and what if you DO keep them in Khalistan? then what would you have achieved? it'd remain status quo, the only thing being you'd have severed any friendship that minutely exi

sts with India right now.

6) capital city .... chandigarh? status quo.. jallandhur.. biggest city.. trashy atmosphere.. drugs drunking.. AMRITSAR! wouldn't that be beautiful? our capital city in Amritsar!?! Logically, it could never happen. It's right on the border of Pakistan and India.. wayyyyy too dangerous..

I'm sorry if i sound negative about it, but these are serious things we have to look at. It appears to me that ever since 1947, it's been an issue of pride. It's been a fight of the 5-year olds. our stance is

"They (muslims) got it! we want it toooo!!!"

India's stance:

"We don't like you. We're not giving you what you want"

and really, these are only the simple questions. water.. base of life.. how willl that work? electricity.. these things are necessities, not small extra options and luxuries... especially for a state like punjab that relies on agrticulture and farming to bolster it's economy

your views and answers would be greatly apprecieated.!!

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5) what to do with the 45% of hindus in the province?? kick them out? hence, steal their land, their assets, essentially.. similar to what happened in 1947... this means the same thing happens to sikhs all over india whom are not in punjab. it'd be a civil war. and what if you DO keep them in Khalistan? then what would you have achieved? it'd remain status quo, the only thing being you'd have severed any friendship that minutely exists with India right now.

we will not do what ind govt did. Why kick hindus out of khalistan? khalistan won't be pure Sikh State. It would be a secular country unlike Ind.

All Hindus and people who belong to other communities would be reassured whether they want to live in Khalistan or go to India in a peaceful way.

All minorities would be treated at par with the majority in Khalistan.

By keeping other communities in Khalistan we would show how in a muticultural country , human rights could be respected.

Remember khalistan would not be India It would be a diverse secular country

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rochak veer i remember ur post, why would hindus staned up against sikhs in khalistan when they're being treated as they should???

rather i dont' even think they would have the ballz 2 do it. But sikhs have a point, a reason, a mathlab, juss like the kashmiris we are a seperate culture a religion without a government to represent us we want distinction and self rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we will not do what ind govt did. Why kick hindus out of khalistan? khalistan won't be pure Sikh State. It would be a secular country unlike Ind.

All Hindus and people who belong to other communities would be reassured whether they want to live in Khalistan or go to India in a peaceful way.

All minorities would be treated at par with the majority in Khalistan.

By keeping other communities in Khalistan we would show how in a muticultural country , human rights could be respected.

Remember khalistan would not be India It would be a diverse secular country

veerji/bhanji....

we're dealing with a VERY VERY VERY large minority here....a minority that continues on growing... and that 45% does not even include the Sikhs who have been targetted and hit by the RSS... so if Sikhs in fact have a majority...we're looking at a 52-48 split or something like that.... it's not nearly as easy as giving them an ultimatum.....not to mention all the power hungry Sikhs and power hungry Hindus that reside there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Definitely the Guru Sahibs would be a heavier Scriptures to handle. Dasam Granth is more towards Bir Rass, Guru Gobind Singh showed his Greatness (of course, they would never say this) by separating his own Baania.  And the BIGGEST test of all?? Do we try and read Dasam Granth, Understand n show respect like we do to SGGS? Or... Do we QUESTION it? Guru Gobind Singh Ji is testing us. 
    • My wife will be going for an MRI scan next week but her Kara won’t physically come off.  Is there any way the mri scan can be done with the Kara still on?  The alternative is we will have to try to saw it off before the scan.  
    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use