amarjeet_singh_1699

lolll...pajee whas that got to do with her issue.....David Beckham is professional ....and a legend to some. id love to meet you pajee one day....we could argue all day.....No il Pass that thought Actually... @ ...someone needs to address bhenji's problem. Do ardas and bani....Guru ji forgives if asked for forgiveness with a true heart and feeling of regret. Guru ji has always forgiven us we just don't see it often enuf. 144713[/snapback] "id love to meet you pajee one day....we could argue all day....." u wudnt wanna argue with me gurbani specifically says not to "moorkhai naal na lujheeai"

u cud change ur picture of david beckham to a less manmat picture

boyfreind/girlfreind relationships are completly manmat, you cant call your self a sikh of the true guru and then have a boyfreind or a girlfreind. it is aginst sikhi. concentrate on your paath and naam, and wen its time, get gursikhs to arrange ur marriage. cant u see that all bf/gf thing is moh and kaam? Awsw mhlw 1 ] aasaa mehulaa 1 Aasaa, First Mehl: iqqu srvrVY BeIly invwsw pwxI pwvku iqnih kIAw ] thith suruvururrai bheelae nivaasaa paanee paavuk thinehi keeaa In that pool, people have made their homes, but the water there is as hot as fire! pMkju moh pgu nhI cwlY hm dyKw qh fUbIAly ]1] punkuj moh pug nehee chaalai hum dhaekhaa theh ddoobeealae In the swamp of emotional attachment, their feet cannot move. I have seen them drowning there. ||1|| mn eyku n cyqis mUV mnw ] mun eaek n chaethas moorr munaa In your mind, you do not remember the One Lord-you fool! hir ibsrq qyry gux gilAw ]1] rhwau ] har bisuruth thaerae gun galiaa You have forgotten the Lord; your virtues shall wither away. ||1||Pause|| nw hau jqI sqI nhI piVAw mUrK mugDw jnmu BieAw ] naa ho juthee suthee nehee parriaa moorukh mugudhaa junum bhaeiaa I am not celibate, nor truthful, nor scholarly. I was born foolish and ignorant into this world. pRxviq nwnk iqn kI srxw ijn qU nwhI vIsirAw ]2]3] prunuvath naanuk thin kee surunaa jin thoo naahee veesariaa Prays Nanak, I seek the Sanctuary of those who have not forgotten You, O Lord! ||2||3||

Plastic cup can get jooth and sarbloh cant?? What kind of preposterous logic is this based on? It baffles me to see so many sikhs out there still holding onto brahmnical ideology of jooth. And the milk in sarbloh will help u jap more? Cmon, i hope not all who follow the sarabloh bibek have such beliefs. Milk remains milk wether u drink it out of plastic cup, glass cup, or sarabloh cup. Milk does not become more pure or more spiritual by putting it in a special container. It is so sad that we have now fallen to such low thinking where even the value of naam has become dependant on mere physical man made objects. How can u compare a metal to man? There is no basis for the above comparison u make. Its like comparing a car and a rock and which is better for transportation purposes. To even consider the rock as a means of transportation is ridiculous. Similarly to consider a piece of metal and man to both be spiritual vehicles is equally ridiculous. Man is the onlly spiritual vessel created capable of realizing God and shud be compared to fellow man alone. If u wish to do so then that is ur perogative and by all means u may do so. I respect ur choice and am not out to force u to change. But i will not stand by and listen to someone saying that sarbloh is the only thing we shud be eating from. Have u considered the thousands of different packages, materials, containers the food comes into contact with before it is brought for sale at the store? From the time the food is harvested, proccessed, packaged, transported, it will have come into contact with hundreds of different materials (and im sorry to tell u that most are not sarbloh!! ) and likewise has been handled by hundreds of people almost none of whom are amritdhari sikhs, let alone be following the sarabloh. And if one truly wish to be HONEST AND TRUE to their sarbloh bibeki then either do it 100% which means no food unless grown and processed by themself (or another amritdhari) from start to point where they put it in ur mouth. ANything short of that wud be considered compromise on something which they deem sooo important to their spirituality. 144629[/snapback] u are confused beyond belief if a man holds a cup of water and swears and curses well holding it and anoba man prays while holding a cup of water u think there is no difference and to the dumbest idea i have heard in my life. amrit in a plastic bata?????? no. amrit is not amrit unless it is in a sarbloh bata. next ull be saying, what if there were only 4 singhs, cud we have 4 pyareh? if there is no bata , its was hukam that those singhs werent to take amrit yet. and even if it was still amrit that still DOESNT ansa my question. why is the bata in an amrit sanchaar in a sarbloh bata?? "Plastic cup can get jooth and sarbloh cant?? What kind of preposterous logic is this based on? It baffles me to see so many sikhs out there still holding onto brahmnical ideology of jooth." how is it ritualistic. u remove layer of sarbloh when u wash it. u cant rmeove layuer of plastic sounds like common sense to me theres no point arguing wiv ppl like u. ur confused beyond help

"How can you tell me tha if i drink milk from a sarbloh cup it will be better for my spirituality versus if i drink from a plastic cup?" plastic cup can get jooth, sarbloh one cant, as u remove a layer wen u wash it if u do no naam of either there will be no difference, if u do naam over both, there will b a difference, the milk in the sarbloh bata will help u jap naam more. i ask agen, y do we have amrit from a sarbloh bata? all metals have been created by god, tht dnt make them all the same. all men have been made by god, so are u aying that a man who utters naam with every breath is the same as a man who commits millions of sins all the time because god made all men?? dont presume im a bibeki or a sarblohi bibeki jus because i belive in the sarbloh bibek rehit all metals are diferent and have different properties sarbloh is what we should eat from, full stop jus like ur kirpan and kara should be sarbloh or are u gonna argue with that as well do u want urs in titnanium, as its more practical?

woah, u guys are messed up. how can u argue against bibek? we shud practise bibek all the tym, bibek of the eyes, nose, ears, mouth, etc. what we eat should effects our bhagti. if we do naam simran whilst making food and then eat the food our naam will flow more easily during the day. we use sarbloh because sarbloh conducts naam. why do we have amrit from a sarbloh bata? its not jus a coincidence. people like kharkoo hu say sarbloh bibek has no effect on ur spirituallity, wat eveidence do u have for this. naam will obviusly effect ur spirituality, and sarbloh bibek is all about naam. those ppl hu like eating at restaraunts and so on, from smokers, drinkers, meat eaters. will obviously b against sarbloh bibek as it restrcits their worldly enjoyments. so basically by saying sarbloh bibek is useless, ur saying the practise of naam is useless. it amazes me to see how mislead some sikhs are nowadays.

u say 1-6, does that mean before 1 is not amrit vela?

beaucoup du parler cest moche

wa bout ma bata idea??????

ive changed ma pigeon post, its much better now.

and a bomb falls and kills everyone. the end

completely wrong if in one amrit sanchaar you are told its ok to eat meat. is this the same as another amrit sanchaar which says dont eat meat???? no. it isnt. there is only one amrit, so there can only be one rehit. you cant have panj pyareh saying u can eat meat in 1 amrit sanchaar and saying u cant at a anova amrit sanchaar. jus like u cant hav the 5th kakaar as kes and keski

if u think that wen u took amrit u werent given the correct, or werent told how to jap naam properly or whtever. u cud pesh at somewhere wer the correct rehit is given and technique of how to do naam is taught

naam simran at amrit vela

naam is ansa to everything

a sarbloh bata

well as u havent replied im assuming youve gone with my idea of the akhand paath, the rainsbais and the asa di //. good good. let us know which gurdwara it will be at

forget reception. have an akhand paath, and then have a rainsbai straight after, then asa di vaar, then anand kaaraj then another rainsbai, then go to sleep

y sooo tall?

forget the reception. and if he dnt agree to a rainsbai instead, his sikhi isnt looking very strong. and if someone with a strong sikhi marries some1 with weak sikhi, the person strong in their sikhi will be pulled down as when you are married, evry thing u do affects both husvabd and wife. y does he want a reception thing anyway? sounds rubbish to me

u sed tht to be gurbani it has to be from the true guru . i u saying that guru gobind singh isnt the true guru? the same jot of guru nanak dev ji through to guru gobind singh ji and now in the guru granth sahib ji is the same. so all bani by any guru is equal. but as i know u will not accept this. im not prepared to argue anymore cos neither of us are gonna change our minds. i jus feel sorry for you that u doubt guru gobind singh jis bani (not talkin bout bachitar naatak jus talkin bout jaap, chaupai. bani that, without a doubt was written by guru gobind singh ji. all the quotes u sed support my argument of guru bani is gurus bani full stop.

right, we should wear bana all the time. can u imagine anyone wearing red bana?????? it would look so stoooooooooooopid. we should wear the colours of the khalsa and jus accept red not a sikh colour to wear. if u ever see a gursikh in red bana ill eat my hat

I don't think any colour is 'anti-panthic' however, Yes I agree that Khalsa colours include of Kesri, White, Blue & Black but this doesn't mean that the other colours are 'anti-panthic'. In my account Guru Sahib accepts all colours, just take Rumalleh for example, When a Gursikh brings a Rumallah at Guru Sahib Ji's charan, the colours consist of many colours, I've seen Rumalleh from red, green, pink, white, cream...etc...etc...but Guru Sahib still accepts them. I'd say the whole topic of which colours to wear and which colours not to as there anti-panthiz is just stupid. Rather than wasting time on assuming that colours are anti-panthic try and make the time useful in Naam Simran. I also think that this thread is getting a little out of topic. what has colours being 'anti-panthic' got to do with "Washing Dastaars"? Bhullan Chukan Dhi Maafee Jio WJKK, WJKF, 141266[/snapback] we dnt wear red gives us kaam u cant giv a gutka kaam

hahahha its good u were blunt. so wat if u hurt his ego, he shud control his kaam

the smagam was good, asa di vaar on saturday was wiked . bit borin durin the day tho