Ranjeet01

So basically you want a race war. And after the whites are defeated, who has the power?

Please do tell us what this change you will see. Are you a chicken-hawk?

You still have not understood the bigger picture have you.

No.

The Abassid/Umayadd Empires never incorporate any kingdoms. Neither did the Ottomans, nor the Romans. Some of kingdoms that were incorporated had to pay tribute like in the Persian Empires. The Mughal had vassal kingdoms. Past empires were not exactly benevolent. The white empires were far more successful and sophisticated in their methods.

Arab muslims castrated black males as well. And they had s3x with the black female slaves.

Bollox.

No.

One country's heroes are another country's villain. The whites have killed and massacred like every other empire did before them. They were probably more successful as they learned from previous empires. The Spanish massacred a lot of native people's in the Americas, but the Spaniards themselves were occupied for nearly 700 years by the muslims and learnt a lot from them. We find it offensive because it was done to us. And at this moment in time, the whites are the top dogs. In central asian countries, they have statues of Timur. Now, Timur massacred and looted people in the subcontinent, maybe we should request the Uzbek govt to take down the statue. Or if in Punjab, if some decides to put up a Hari Singh Nalwa statue and some Pakistani Pathan or Afghani finds it offensive because during our empire, he burnt down villages to suppress their rebellion. We want to right a perceived wrong, but all that can happen is you go down a slippery slope.

Yes it is.

I think people don't understand female psychology. Women tend to go for the most dominant man of the most dominant tribe. This is something hardwired into them. You see the same behaviours in the animal kingdom. There is a war-bride phenomenon (a form of stockholm syndrome of sorts). This what all the Abrahamic religions understand, that you invade another tribe, you kill the men and then take the most attractive women. Abrahamics are based on old tribal ways, going back to hunter-gatherer days. Us dharmics for most part have grown out of this behaviour but it is important to understand.

Most of the statues being knocked over and vandalised are being done by whites. I saw one of the Colston statues in Bristol being pulled down and stomped in. (Colston is one of those who made his money in the slave trade.) You could not see one black person, all white. Like I said in another thread. Black Lives are a side show. Any aggreievances by any black people has been hijacked. What we have is anarchists who want to burn everything down. The level of depravity is mainly by a particular type of gorah. There is an attempt to create a civil war and it is between goreh of one persuasion to instigate violence against the other goreh. The other goreh have not risen to take the bait. The goreh are the glue that keeps the country bound together. The goal is to turn them against each other.

The BLM is a sideshow for something more sinister. The blacks are in the middle of what is a white-on-white violence.

We are a colonised people, not only physically but mentally as well

That is what TPTB want to happen.

By being light skinned, blond, oriental looking with a black woman's booty means she will be able to attract as men as possible.

Skin colour maybe an issue but body parts are different matter. In the west, having bigger lips and butt implants seem to be the order of the day. I wonder who the first Bollywood actress to get herself a bigger backside. It's only a matter of time before they'd be twerking ??

Skin lightening definitely as well. She's had her nose done and her eyes done. It is to make them look as Caucasian as possible. But she looks more 'East Asian', it is done to appeal to particular markets. All this picture needs are blue eye contacts. I remember the first time I saw an apni with blond hair, I got physically sick, I wanted to throw up. It was the most disgusting thing I have ever seen.

Make up, lighting and photoshopping. If you saw her in real life, she won't even look like these pictures. She will just be a tall ,skinny,gangly South Indian girl. Saw Shah Rukh Khan and Priyanka Chopra at Heathrow once. Both are a lot darker in real life and Shah Rukh is very grey, he looks a lot older in real life. These guys have bad diets, smoke like chimneys and get very little sleep.

Those are very good points. There is definitely romanticism with US black experience. But it is one way. The US blacks are just typically like all other Americans in their solipsism. There are riots breaking out in France all the time and there are a lot of black people in France (probably more than the UK) but you never see UK blacks showing any solidarity with the French blacks. The irony about Malcolm X is that after he did his pilgrimage to Mecca, he changed his perspective on relationship with white people. But he has become a Che Guevara like icon with his "by any means necessary " line. He is a brand name.

I don't like the a**-kissing to America. I don't recall any protests in the US when we had riots in UK back in 2011.

I am not too sure about Russia and China having deep friendship though probably have interests that align. They have an interest to join forces against US/West particularly in the Middle East (Syria/Iran) and you are correct regarding US reaction to Huawei, so they have common interests. Russia has a vastly underpopulated far east and China probably has some eyes on some land grab. China will want to cut India down to size as they are thinking long term who their competitors would be and that would be India. They already have "a string of pearls" strategy in the Indian Ocean. They have be-friended the regime in Burma, Sri Lanka. (Helping to build ports and naval bases). The base in Gwadar in Pakistan has been largely funded by them. As well as all their investments in Africa. India's southern and western flank in the Indian Ocean has been completely surrounded. The world has been asleep whilst China has been quietly on the rise.

For what reason would Russia join with China to attack India.

Word of caution: in Canada, they will only offer you a role if they cannot find a Canadian to do it. Also please note that Surrey is not a suburb of Vancouver and is a city in it's own right. I think there are probably nearly half a million people living there now. So there are areas that not so pleasant as others in the city. The pace of life there is slower and being that you live in South East of England, you are more used to hustle and bustle . In general, the goreh over there are more outdoors type of people. They like hiking, cycling, fishing, hunting etc. People in general there are more friendly to strangers. What I mean by that is in London and in the home counties, people on public transport don't talk to each other. Over in Canada (generalising here), if you are on public transport, complete strangers will strike up a conversation with you. If you are from the UK, it will seem very strange as you won't be used to it. So prepare to adapt to a different environment.

I think it is more to have your own sovereignty and have control over your own affairs. Our people need some political entity to fall back on. What I have learnt is that it is no point having economic power if you cannot have political power to go with it.