dallysingh101

I'm coming towards the end of season 3. It's good thus far, and normally I'd not get this far. I heard it gets less good towards the end. This was really good too:

Good point! It looks like our canuck brethren have it made! It's like one brother from there commented on this forum. He thinks they're more than financially secure, but don't know what what to do with the money because of small mindedness and lack of vision. So they act all gangsta! lol If kalay are systemically harassing bazoorags, please send one of those apnay 'gangstas' to put a slug in a knee cap or something to make a point. I'm sure they'll quickly learn. Have you see the sizes of their houses out there......... They must think we live in hovels over here! lol

Been binge watching this recently. I'm onto season 3. I think it's brilliant!

I don't want to unite with any so-called 'Sikh' who is really a two-faced, closet casteist peasant, who believes they are some special breed. They could all f**k themselves and die. And there are a lot of them about. Nah, I think they have some point. You can't deny the horrific historical relationship between whites and blacks, and what's gone on between whites and other indigenous communities in lands they've colonised. And there has undoubtedly been rampant sycophancy from our lot towards whites, and blacks have historically been ostracised by whites for opportunities compared to browns - I saw this myself when I worked in the corporate environment for a few years after graduating. I think apnay don't even admit this is happening (making them jewlike in their opportunism), and I think it's deeper than the simple narrative you make out above. Because a helluva lot of apnay would replicate this very oppressive social structure themselves if they could - keep it real - they have done exactly this in rural Panjab. Blacks try and change the 5hitty situation, our lot weasel around it, never seriously confronting it. Whites 'punish' those societies who don't challenge their hegemony less than those that do.

I don't doubt 'Sikh liberals' would do that. I think most balanced Sikhs, without feeble minds know damn well that a lot of other communities (at ground level) hate us for one reason or another. We aren't unaware of inimical historical legacies between us and other communities that existed way before Sikhs knew white people even existed. I know when I was younger and a lot of people from all over the globe were thrown together in one neighbourhood, a lot of conflict inbetween groups ensued. But I have to say, 'multicultural neighbourhood' dynamics can be like a macrocosm of prison dynamics - once a certain person/people get a reputation for being weak - they get targeted all the time. We Sikhs can't ignore this reality unfortunately.

When I was growing up, a lot of brown folk (including Sikhs) were considered passive in comparison to others. It took a new hardened generation to come up and reconfigure that image. Old reputations don't account for a single thing at ground level in between men.

No, I think a lot of us know there is a lot of f**ked up sh1t going on there. But we acknowledge that these people have been at the very forefront of the battle against white supremacism, making a lot of sacrifices. It's true that those who descend from slaves have gone through sustained atrocities over generations that are akin to what moghuls tried to do with Sikhs. I have no doubt that this experience brought a savage, base, predatory instinct out of many of them. Plus I do think a lot of light skinned, northern indians have a deep rooted, hatred of dark skinned people going back a while. What I saw with blacks where I grew up is that once people kicked back at them and f**ked them up, their behaviour changed. And it sort of reset the dynamic between communities. That's important information to know because when I go to other places in england, the dynamic between brown and blacks is different, more like what you described. Plus in the US, I know for a fact that a lot of blacks resent browns because of a perception that browns turn a blind eye to racism whilst blacks take most of the heat and others benefit from the changes they facilitate, especially legislative changes. Sikhs and blacks need to redefine their relationship maybe. I'm sure it will probably involve some level of conflict?

I've seen race conflicts involving brown people, white people and black people - Indians don't come up too highly..... too much of that passive, eager to please and be everyone's buddy mentality we keep talking about on various threads probably.

Because most'd get beaten (ironically) black and blue if they tried maybe? lol

It's true, but it's also down to a lot of Sikhs being considered white-buml1cking, sycophant 'Paajits', who turn a blind eye to white supremacism, until it effects them directly.

A lot of this went on back in the day in the UK. It only stops when Sikh boys start fight fighting back and making it in the interests of others to leave them alone unfortunately. I think how women/mothers react to this, often makes the bullying worse.

These guys are stuck in some backwards world of their own. All that close contact with others of a similar ilk makes it seem normal to them. They are like caricatures often.

If you click the link at the bottom you can see a video of the poor women trying to escape and being dragged back into the property by the scum's staff: US national who is the son of one of Pakistan's richest families is sentenced to death for raping and beheading diplomat's daughter, 27, after she rejected his proposal Zahir Jaffer brutally murdered Noor Muqaddam at his Islamabad home last year Mukadam, 27, the daughter of a former ambassador made attempts to escape CCTV footage showed her being stopped from leaving and dragged on the floor The court heard 30-year-old Pakistani-American Jaffer tortured her with a knuckleduster, raped her, and used a 'sharp-edged weapon' to behead her Jaffer comes from respected family. His father is a director of a trading company In Pakistan, the conviction rate for violence against women is around 3 percent A US national has been sentenced to death for raping and beheading a diplomat's daughter after she rejected his marriage proposal. Zahir Jaffer, the son of one of the richest families in Pakistan, brutally murdered Noor Muqaddam, 27, at his home in Islamabad on July 20, 2021. Security camera footage showed Mukadam, the daughter of a former ambassador, had made repeated attempts to escape the sprawling mansion but was blocked by two members Jaffer's staff. That footage has been released to the public, and shows Muqaddam trying to flee the compound through a large gate, but being stopped by the staff. CCTV footage then shows her being dragged by her arm along the floor by a man, through a door and back into the property. Zahir Jaffer (pictured Thursday leaving court), the son of one of the richest families in Pakistan, brutally murdered Noor Muqaddam, 27, at his home in Islamabad on July 20, 2021 Security camera footage showed Noor Mukadam (pictured), made repeated attempts to escape the sprawling mansion but was blocked by staff The court heard that the 30-year-old Pakistani-American tortured her with a knuckleduster, raped her, and used a 'sharp-edged weapon' to behead her. 'The main accused has been awarded the death sentence,' said judge Atta Rabbani at the Islamabad district court. Jaffer's parents, Zakir Jaffer and Asmat Adamjee, were found not guilty of attempting to cover up the crime. The two staff members were sentenced to 10 years in prison for abetting murder. 'I am happy that justice has been served,' said Shuakat Mukadam, Noor's father, while pledging to challenge the acquittal of Jaffer's parents. The case prompted an explosive reaction from women's rights campaigners reckoning with the pervasion of violence against women. The shocking nature of the murder, involving a couple from the privileged elite of Pakistani society, led to pressure for the trial to conclude swiftly in a country where the justice system is notoriously sluggish and cases typically drag on for years. According to the Asma Jahangir Legal Aid Cell, a group providing legal assistance to vulnerable women, the conviction rate for cases of violence against them is lower than three percent. Targets of sexual and domestic abuse are often too afraid to speak out, and criminal complaints frequently not investigated seriously. The case prompted an explosive reaction from women's rights campaigners reckoning with the pervasion of violence against women. Pictured: Women rights activists hold placards and candles during a protest rally against the brutal killing of Noor Mukadam, February 22 'Convictions have been dismally low for victims... making today's guilty verdict all the more significant,' said Amnesty International South Asia campaigner Rimmel Mohydin. The court verdict dictates Jaffer be 'hanged by his neck till he is dead', however he was also given a concurrent sentence of 25 years in prison for abduction and rape. He will also be able to challenge Thursday's verdict. According to local reports, Jaffer belongs to a high-society family in Pakistan who founded a trading company in 1849 - Ahmed Jaffer and Company. His father, Zakir, serves as a director of the company, according to his profile on LinkedIn. Jaffer's mother Asmat is reportedly a housewife. Executions have rarely been carried out in Pakistan in recent years - and usually only involving terrorism cases - in part due to pressure from the European Union. The last was in December 2019, according to the Justice Project Pakistan, making it likely Jaffer will only serve jail time, with remissions for religious holidays and good behaviour. Jaffer was thrown out of court several times during the trial for unruly behaviour. He was frequently carried into proceedings by stretcher or wheelchair, and his lawyers argued he should be found not 'mentally sound' - a manoeuvre prosecutors said was designed to have the trial suspended. At one hearing he claimed someone else had killed Mukadam during a 'drug party' at his house. Shuakat Mukadam, a former ambassador and father of the murdered Pakistani girl Noor Mukadam, speaks to the members of the media as he leaves a court after the case verdict in Islamabad, Pakistan, 24 February 2022 When questioning Mukadam's father - a former ambassador to South Korea and Kazakhstan - Jaffer's lawyer implied she was killed by her own family for conducting a relationship outside of marriage. Prosecutions for violence and sexual assault frequently see the female victim's personal history picked over according to Pakistan's patriarchal mores - another reason why justice is rare for women. According to a recent report by Human Rights Watch on Pakistan, 'Violence against women and girls – including rape, murder, acid attacks, domestic violence, and forced marriage – is endemic throughout Pakistan. Human rights defenders estimate that roughly 1,000 women are killed in so-called 'honour' killings every year.' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10550649/US-national-son-one-Pakistans-richest-families-sentenced-death.html

Southallians, you're not the only one believe you me.....lol

https://sunehamag.com/explore/?category=fiction&sort=latest

Do you guys mean raisins and not grapes????

Nah, some blokes are clued up to these things. It was very violent and racist when I was growing up, I've never been under any illusion that things can't go back to that. Some people have been expecting it to be honest. The generation before mine used to talk about when goray will try and kick us out in future. It just took a lot longer (than imagined) for whites to get themselves ready for this, having got f**ked over last time. We can see they are using hindus like priti for this agenda now. Who I feel sorry for are the apnay fudhus who were raised up in the the quiet period (I think these are the people you are talking about above). Those 1diots aren't going to know what's hit them. Ultimately though, Sikh men have a lot of battles ahead of them. Not just with sullay and 'hinduvata' (which is a joke outside of India), but white supremacist neo-nazism (a more serious issue). This will be a big battle, but sadly, we'll have to fight a few of our own chaaplooses too, because certain juts just seem to naturally subordinate themselves to goray quickly. It's better we wipe this type out now, and save the headache later.

You're too pessimistic.

No, it's just western white proclivities finally crawling out of the cupboard for all to see. Nothing new, they just don't feel compelled to hide it anymore.

As Ukraine’s struggle against Russia and its proxies continues, Kiev must also contend with a growing problem behind the front lines: far-right vigilantes who are willing to use intimidation and even violence to advance their agendas, and who often do so with the tacit approval of law enforcement agencies. A January 28 demonstration, in Kiev, by 600 members of the so-called “National Militia,” a newly-formed ultranationalist group that vows “to use force to establish order,” illustrates this threat. While the group’s Kiev launch was peaceful, National Militia members in balaclavas stormed a city council meeting in the central Ukrainian town of Cherkasy the following day, skirmishing with deputies and forcing them to pass a new budget. Many of the National Militia's members come from the Azov movement, one of the 30-odd privately-funded “volunteer battalions” that, in the early days of the war, helped the regular army to defend Ukrainian territory against Russia's separatist proxies. Although Azov uses Nazi-era symbolism and recruits neo-Nazis into its ranks, a recent article in Foreign Affairs downplayed any risks the group might pose, pointing out that, like other volunteer militias, Azov has been “reined in” through its integration into Ukraine’s armed forces. While it’s true that private militias no longer rule the battlefront, it’s the home front that Kiev needs to worry about now. When Russian President Vladimir Putin’s seizure of Crimea four years ago first exposed the decrepit condition of Ukraine’s armed forces, right-wing militias such as Azov and Right Sector stepped into the breach, fending off the Russian-backed separatists while Ukraine’s regular military regrouped. Though, as a result, many Ukrainians continue to regard the militias with gratitude and admiration, the more extreme among these groups promote an intolerant and illiberal ideology that will endanger Ukraine in the long term. Since the Crimean crisis, the militias have been formally integrated into Ukraine’s armed forces, but some have resisted full integration: Azov, for example, runs its own children’s training camp, and the careers section instructs recruits who wish to transfer to Azov from a regular military unit. According to Freedom House’s Ukraine project director Matthew Schaaf, “numerous organized radical right-wing groups exist in Ukraine, and while the volunteer battalions may have been officially integrated into state structures, some of them have since spun off political and non-profit structures to implement their vision.” Schaaf noted that “an increase in patriotic discourse supporting Ukraine in its conflict with Russia has coincided with an apparent increase in both public hate speech, sometimes by public officials and magnified by the media, as well as violence towards vulnerable groups such as the LGBT community,” an observation that is supported by a recent Council of Europe study. In recent months, Ukraine has experienced a wave of unchecked vigilantism. Institute Respublica, a local pro-democracy NGO, reported that activists are frequently harassed by vigilantes when holding legal meetings or rallies related to politically-controversial positions, such as the promotion of LGBT rights or opposition to the war. Azov and other militias have attacked anti-fascist demonstrations, city council meetings, media outlets, art exhibitions, foreign students and Roma. Progressive activists describe a new climate of fear that they say has been intensifying ever since last year's near-fatal stabbing of anti-war activist Stas Serhiyenko, which is believed to have been perpetrated by an extremist group named C14 (the name refers to a 14-word slogan popular among white supremacists). Brutal attacks this month on International Women’s Day marches in several Ukrainian cities prompted an unusually forceful statement from Amnesty International, which warned that "the Ukrainian state is rapidly losing its monopoly on violence.” Ukraine is not the only country that must contend with a resurgent far right. But Kiev’s recent efforts to incorporate independent armed groups into its regular armed forces, as well as a continuing national sense of indebtedness to the militias for their defense of the homeland, make addressing the ultranationalist threat considerably more complicated than it is elsewhere. According to Schaaf and the Institute Respublica, Ukrainian extremists are rarely punished for acts of violence. In some cases — such as C14's January attack on a remembrance gathering for two murdered journalists — police actually detain peaceful demonstrators instead. To be clear, the Kremlin’s claims that Ukraine is a hornets’ nest of fascists are false: far-right parties performed poorly in Ukraine’s last parliamentary elections, and Ukrainians reacted with alarm to the National Militia’s demonstration in Kiev. But connections between law enforcement agencies and extremists give Ukraine’s Western allies ample reason for concern. C14 and Kiev's city government recently signed an agreement allowing C14 to establish a "municipal guard" to patrol the streets; three such militia-run guard forces are already registered in Kiev, and at least 21 operate in other cities. In an ideal world, President Petro Poroshenko would purge the police and the interior ministry of far-right sympathizers, including Interior Minister Arsen Avakov, who has close ties to Azov leader Andriy Biletsky, as well as Sergei Korotkykh, an Azov veteran who is now a high-ranking police official. But Poroshenko would risk major repercussions if he did so; Avakov is his chief political rival, and the ministry he runs controls the police, the National Guard and several former militias. As one Ukrainian analyst noted in December, control of these forces make Avakov extremely powerful and Poroshenko’s presidency might not be strong enough to withstand the kind of direct confrontation with Avakov that an attempt to oust him or to strike at his power base could well produce. Poroshenko has endured frequent verbal threats, including calls for revolution, from ultranationalist groups, so he may believe that he needs Avakov to keep them in check. Avakov’s Peoples’ Party status as the main partner in Ukraine’s parliamentary coalition increases Avakov’s leverage over Poroshenko’s Bloc. An attempt to fire Avakov could imperil Poroshenko’s slim legislative majority, and lead to early parliamentary elections. Given Poroshenko’s current unpopularity, this is a scenario he will likely try to avoid. Despite his weak position, Poroshenko still has some options for reducing the threat from the far right. Though Avakov controls the Ukraine’s police and National Guard, Poroshenko still commands Ukraine’s security and intelligence services, the SBU, and could instruct the agency to cut its ties with C14 and other extremist groups. Poroshenko should also express public support for marginalized groups like the Roma and LGBT communities, and affirm his commitment to protecting their rights. Western diplomats and human rights organizations must urge Ukraine’s government to uphold the rule of law and to stop allowing the far right to act with impunity. International donors can help by funding more initiatives like the United States Agency for International Development’s projects supporting training for Ukrainian lawyers and human rights defenders, and improving equitable access to the judicial system for marginalized communities. There’s no easy way to eradicate the virulent far-right extremism that has been poisoning Ukrainian politics and public life, but without vigorous and immediate efforts to counteract it, it may soon endanger the state itself. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cohen-ukraine-commentary-idUSKBN1GV2TY

I understand.

Given what the majority of Panjabis have been brainwashed with over the last few decades......is it really surprising?

Perfectly put: Intelligence (or lack of) is a big factor here.

Are the bullets in clips inserted into the handle?