Jump to content

Takht panel clears ‘Jo Bole So Nihal’


kurtas
 Share

Recommended Posts

Well done to the committee and Jathedar Vedanti. Appears it is ok to have films with Sikh names and lots of vulgar scenes. Thanks Jathedar Vedanti, you have opened the flood gates.

What we going to do when some <banned word filter activated> releases a porn movie with a Sikh as a hero ? I suppose according to the precedent set by the committee as long as "....the hero of the movie, insisted on growing his beard and used to tie the turban afresh. He had also employed a Sikh to help him in tying the turban" the Akal Takht will not have a problem.

Farcical how Vedanti and his Committee have failed to do anything about the matters raised by Respect for Guru Ji Campaign despite more than 6 months passing and the beadbi of Guru Ji yet are ok reviewing this film and apssing it as ok.

Looks like the Akal Takht needs to be claimed back from the corporate barons and handed back to the panth.

Takht panel clears ‘Jo Bole So Nihal’

Jupinderjit Singh

Tribune News Service

Ludhiana, May 11

A committee of eminent experts on Sikh religion formed by the Akal Takht Jathedar, Giani Joginder Singh Vedanti, has given a clean chit to controversial film “Jo Bole So Nihal” even as the outrage against the movie continues, with some organisations determined not to allow its screening at any cost. The committee has instead praised the movie.

Following the committee verdict, whose six members saw the movie at a special show screened in Mumbai, Mr Amarjit Singh, president, Akal Market Association and petitioner against the film, has withdrawn his petition filed in the Punjab and Haryana High Court demanding a ban on the movie.

Jathedar Vedanti has, in a communication to Mr Amarjit Singh, sent him the report of the committee about the movie. Mr Amarjit Singh said the report of the committee was the final word on the controversial movie by Akal Takht and he decided to withdraw his petition despite having some reservations about the movie.

The committee has not only issued a clean chit to the movie but has praised the makers and the hero of the film, Sunny Deol, for a realistic portrayal of a Sikh, besides upholding the true values of Sikhism in the film. The film is being distributed by liquor baron Ponty Chadha.

The committee members who saw the screening of the movie in Hari Kunj, Khar Mumbai, were Mr Gurjit Singh, Mr Sarbjit Singh, Mr Ajit Singh, Mr Prabinder Singh, Mr Joginder Singh and Mr Prithipal Singh.

The committee has listed eight points after watching the movie. It said that the film was not a religious movie; the hero had firm faith in the Waheguru and overcame all obstacles because of his faith and there was no attempt to hurt the religious feelings of Sikhs in the film.

It said a villain in the film, after assuming the attire of a Sikh, tried to consume tobacco but the mother of the hero slapped him and gave the right message to the viewers about the tenets of Sikhism.

The committee also noted that Sunny Deol, the hero of the movie, insisted on growing his beard and used to tie the turban afresh. He had also employed a Sikh to help him in tying the turban.

The committee has, however, directed the director and the producer of the movie to mention specifically in advertisements and promotions of the movie that it was not a religious film. It has also ordered that no poster or scene should be pasted or carried in the advertisements which did not correspond to the title ‘Jo Bole So Nihal’.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Time to elect a new Jathedaar. A Jathedaar with guts to stand up to RSS media and give them answers and do something about these actions by bollywood. Who goes to bollywood? Kanjars. Kanjars aren't Sikh. Sunny, Funny, Playboy bunny isn't Sikh and we don't need Sikhs like him either. I think Vedanti takes Sukha. Do you guys tthink the same thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

v-irgin got filtered??? what if i was talking about extra v-irgin olive oil?..

v-irgin isn't always used in the context that the admins here are trying to void..i work in a research lab and that word is used commonplace for a variety of reasons...

i suggest we unfilter the word...just my two cents...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

forgot to comment on the topic...

hmmm...y'all think it's time for a revolution???

i mean..when the masands got corrupted, guru ji took care of them...

when the udasis started installing idols in guru's darbar, his loyal sikhs got control back from them (not a dig at udasis, i'm sure many of them do great bhagti..but we cannot pretend that some did not get corrupted)

so now..when the SGPC...which probably started out with good intentions has all but left every gurmat assool that guru ji taught..shouldn't they be taken out???? (by that i mean taken out of gurdwara management...)

maybe the whole panth leadership needs to take a back seat...i mean EVERY organization in the panth is having problems now to some extent...and it's the adults in charge who are causing the problems...maybe it's time to hand over the reigns to the youth..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use