Jump to content

Terrorist Apologists!


randip singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

You are aware of the bombings that happened in London, and here are some views shared on this subject from this link. What do you think?

http://www.sikh-history.com/cgi-bin/Ultima...ic;f=9;t=000412

You know who I really blame for this Bains. The "Terrorist Apologists". This loose spectrum of people consist of anti-war people, Liberal people, anti-blair people, and Islamists.

Together these morons have been so busy condeming the Iraq war and the Afghanistan War, they are forgetting where the policy of Pre-Emptive strikes by the US has started from. The are so busy in calling Blair a Liar (unfoundedly and without any proof), they are forgetting why he said he would stand by the US.

This campaign by these extremists (Al-Quyeeda) has gone on from the begining of the 90's. From blowing up US embassies abroad (Kenya the most barbaric), to kidnapping European citizens in Islamic countries, to blowing up UK citizens in Saudi Arabia, to 9/11, to Bali, to Madrid, to Turkey, and now the UK. Just what the hell do these "Terrorist Apologists" expect the Western world to do, just sit around and do nothing.

These "Apologists" (by there own political motivations), legitimize the actions of these terrorists by saying that Bush is a war monger, so is Blair etc , and that they started it by going into the Middle East etc. These leaders, whatever the faults are democratically elected leaders, and NOT self appointed defenders of a stone age faith.

They (The "Terrorist Apologists") think they are legitimately defending democracy, but all they are doing is pandering to the "Terrorists" and giving them excuses for there actions. I say send in even more troops to the Middle East and just shut the whole place down. Also, detain terrorist suspects in this country indefinitely (if these scum bags can't respect our democracy, then why should they enjoy it).

and how do you counter these do gooder apologists?

http://www.sikh-history.com/cgi-bin/Ultima...10;t=000743;p=1

The Liberal do gooders need to be challenged with their basic assumptions:

1) On Iraq and Afghanistan, and that the west were wrong. The terrorists feel vindicated on thois point. The reality is that they were killing and maiming long before action were taken in Afghanistan and Iraq.

2) That our leaders are either fools and liars. I am not a fan of Tony Blair and have read all evidence e.g Hutton and Butler reports and they have been quoted out of context by the wishy washy Liberals.. The Butler report especially found no evidence of embelishment of records and reports by the Government. The only place where they can be challenged is on their political decision.

3)Liberal do gooders are ineffect "Terrorist Apologists". They are making excuses for these mainiacs.

4) Appeasement does not work. Appeasement as Winston Churchill described is falling into a lake with alligators and throwing your friends at the alligators in the hope you don't get eaten. These do gooders expected the UK not to stand with the US, in the hope they wood leave the UK alone. How cowardly and how sad.

At every opportunity you get, challenge these do gooders, becasue the fundamentalists are riding on these peoples tails coats. These terrorists are no different to the Nazi's, and the Liberals tried to Appease the Nazi's in the 1930's too. Look what happened then?

Winston Churchill said "An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. "
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use