Jump to content

Purpose Of Shaster In Dastaar


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

shastars used to have practical and spiritual representations. they used to be used in hand to hand combat in jang. it was also there for protection purposes. there have been times when the singhs used to come from war, and untie their dastaars, and bulets used to pour out. very effective on protecting from sword hits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru ji ka khalsa

Waheguru ji ke fateh

As my veer ji said they serve spiritual purposes, and practical ones, even when singhs hands and limbs were decapitated they used to continue to fight, even if it meant using their heads!! so they had shasters tied to dummalas and chakars etc... they also served as protection.

One other reason is, to adorn our crowns (dastar) with our gurus jewels (shasters) just as kings and queens decorate their crowns with jewels. shasters are our jewels.

bhul chuk khima

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Is The Purpsoe Of Shaster In Your Dastar , What is It Significances alot of youth wear shaster in their dastar etc.. but do they no why they do?? is it just a fashion statment ??

Did sikhs in the gurus times wear shaster in their dastaars??

If So then why?

Go to Shastar Vidiya (not gatkha) Classes, Shastara in Dastaray are used for combat and not for spritual purposes. You can use your dastar that has Shastara in it as a weapon in close combat for example grapling (which they dont teach you in gatkha).

Ive seen many Amritderhi Sikhs wear Shastara in their dastaray but im assuming they dont know how to use them. My Ustaj at Shastar Vidiya said that Guru Gobind Singh ji said that having weapons and not having the know how to how to use them is like poison.

But im guessing there'll be other people on this forum that are going to say, "No wearing shastar on the dastar is for spritual purposes".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think its important to learn different types of fighting vidiya, even of shastar, such as kali, kendo etc, wat ever is available to u. things like thai bocing, boxing etc

Kali is already a part of Shastar Vidiya, Kali means Death. Even in the time of Satyug there was Shastar Vidiya but as time went by, this Vidiya expanded into other countrys into different style's like Kung Fu, Karate etc etc. This is why people that come to Shastar Vidiya that are against this Vidiya, think that Shastar Vidiya is coping other systems. Shastar Vidiya also teaches you technique's which are simpler to the Sticky Parm Technique which is also found in Wing Tsun. Everyone that thinks that Shastar Vidiya is copying other systems, this isnt true and there are also similarities between systems. The origin of all Martial Arts came from around North India (or whatever it was called in Satyug).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know the origons of shastar vidya, but its so difficult to get a propa teacha, that knows the pratan system. n its so distorted now, so im saying just to practice and learn as much as u can, the important fing is that we are actually learning systems on how to defend. the sticky parm, or sticky hands is a system used in many martial arts. the variation from kali is the movement. kali or ascreemer has different movement to gatkha, shorter. short weapon system. it doesnt deal with vaars, but rather short snappy movement. very practical way of fighting in this day and age

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use