Jump to content

The Enemies Of The Khalsa?


Sarbloh
 Share

Recommended Posts

The day we start to believe that we have enemies in the world is the day we become our worst enemies.

Who are the enemies of the Khalsa? The reason I ask this is there seems to be current over paranoia about conspirators who are out to “destroy” Sikhi? Looking at our history, can Akal Purakh Ki Fauj really be destroyed? Sri Akal Purakh is nirbha-o nirvair (No Fear. No Hatred), then can Akal Purakh Ki Fauj harbour any hatred towards anyone?

Jab lag Khalsa rahe niara. tab lag tej dio mai sara.

So long as Khalsa retains the distinct identity, I will give him my entire radiance and strength.

(Dasmesh Pita Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj)

Does this over paranoia boil down to our own weakness’ and lack of appreciation of Sikhi. If our reni/beni revolved around Gurbani and Rehat (which makes the Khalsa “niara” or distinct) then we will see what hypothetical threats these groups actually do pose to us as. Until then all we will ever do is continue tormenting ourselves about these Islamic conversions rates, the RSS Hindus or all the thousands of other groups that come and go.

Elder Gursikhs sometimes say that these so-called "kumiya" (shortcomings) of the Panth that you see around you are your own "kumiya", no one elses but yours! As soon as you work on your kumiya then watch how the environment around you changes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I agree with evrything you wrote up there and it is true, got a question now: but wouldnt we class people that use propaganda to have Sikh people convert to other religions as enemys?

If a certain group’s propaganda is so easy to convert “Sikh” people to other religions then arguably did that person who converted understand Sikhi in the first place? Is the propaganda creator unintentionally highlighting our weakness’ and poor relationship with our Guru? Is he then an enemy or someone Guru Ji has sent down to give us a reality check!

karmee aapo aapnee kay nayrhai kay door.

According to their own actions, some are drawn closer, and some are driven farther away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our own worst enemies are ourshelves. we do not teach our children nothing about sikhi. Not everyone is gonig to be perfect in sikhi.

a threat to sikhi other than that is the propaganda that is put out by rss and muslims etc... this obviously can be counter attacked by good parchar.

but the muslim issue where they use rape drugs etc. is a bigger problem we seem to always put this problem under the carpet. we seem to blame the girls for being in that positstion.

the khalsa used to go and protect and bring back girls that were taken away by the mugals... but todays khalsa cant even protect is own sisters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our own worst enemies are ourshelves. we do not teach our children nothing about sikhi. Not everyone is gonig to be perfect in sikhi.

a threat to sikhi other than that is the propaganda that is put out by rss and muslims etc... this obviously can be counter attacked by good parchar.

but the muslim issue where they use rape drugs etc. is a bigger problem we seem to always put this problem under the carpet. we seem to blame the girls for being in that positstion.

the khalsa used to go and protect and bring back girls that were taken away by the mugals... but todays khalsa cant even protect is own sisters

Do we prematurely label ourselves Khalsa even though we are still so far away?. The Khalsa, the saint-soldier married to the two-fold ideal of Bhagti and Shakti, who combine self-respect with humility. Guru Gobind Singh Sahib Ji Maharaj, the creator of the Khalsa regarded himself as a servant of the Khalsa. The Khalsa is given a position equal to that of the Guru. The Guru consists of two parts : the body and the Name. The Guru nominated the Khalsa, as his body and Guru Granth Sahib Ji as the embodiment the Name. That is why we use the title of Guru-Khalsa.

How many of us at this point in time are truly, honestly capable of carrying the title of the Khalsa? Not me. But our direction should be to attain the qualities of the Khalsa, not to adopt the title so easily. Through the merits of the Khalsa, we will be able to comprehend the real problems and the real solutions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our own worst enemies are ourshelves. we do not teach our children nothing about sikhi. Not everyone is gonig to be perfect in sikhi.

a threat to sikhi other than that is the propaganda that is put out by rss and muslims etc... this obviously can be counter attacked by good parchar.

but the muslim issue where they use rape drugs etc. is a bigger problem we seem to always put this problem under the carpet. we seem to blame the girls for being in that positstion.

the khalsa used to go and protect and bring back girls that were taken away by the mugals... but todays khalsa cant even protect is own sisters

Do we prematurely label ourselves Khalsa even though we are still so far away?. The Khalsa, the saint-soldier married to the two-fold ideal of Bhagti and Shakti, who combine self-respect with humility. Guru Gobind Singh Sahib Ji Maharaj, the creator of the Khalsa regarded himself as a servant of the Khalsa. The Khalsa is given a position equal to that of the Guru. The Guru consists of two parts : the body and the Name. The Guru nominated the Khalsa, as his body and Guru Granth Sahib Ji as the embodiment the Name. That is why we use the title of Guru-Khalsa.

How many of us at this point in time are truly, honestly capable of carrying the title of the Khalsa? Not me. But our direction should be to attain the qualities of the Khalsa, not to adopt the title so easily. Through the merits of the Khalsa, we will be able to comprehend the real problems and the real solutions.

agree with you completly but thats not to say just because we aint khalseh we shudnt do nothing to prevent such things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you imagine a Punjab wide campaign by Khalse against the evil of female foeticide?

Do you think preventing the extinguishing of one quarter of Sikh girls in the womb is a good and righteous struggle? Or are we to get involved in superficial disputes?

The way I see it is this -- the Sikh race is heading for a catastrophe unprecedented in human history -- of killing and destroying all the females amongst us. This is an urgent thing. Why shouldnt the Khalsa set itself the task of combatting this?

No Sikh girls -----> moral degeneration of men ---------> no Sikhs ----------> no Khalsa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with Braham Vidya and Prem, I might be miscommunicating myself in that I am not saying the we should take a back seat in anything until we get the divine revalation. But we should always be looking at all perspectives and really getting to the root of all problems. What Prem is highlighting is a major problem and a classic case of we reap what we sow. Maharaj told us not to do the sangat or “kurimaars” (girl killers), yet we still bread a culture which put the birth of a boy superior over the birth of a girl, something that is still subtly practiced in Punjabi families today. We turned out to be our own enemies here because our egos were not willing accept what Guru Ji told us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Khalsa are saint-soldiers ---- can you imagine anything more urgent than the need to defend girls inside the womb from mass murder? GIRLS IN THE WOMB!

Shouldnt the Khalsa be defending them? Khalsa was created to defend the weak. Can you imagine the power of Khalsa enforcing laws on this, linking up with scientists and activists, demanding action be taken?

How can there be anything more weak and helpless than an unborn girl? Shouldnt Khalsa be defending them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use