Jump to content

Shoot Out @ Lokhandwala


SaRpAnCh
 Share

Recommended Posts

i think veer ji in movie thy r not sying bhindrawale ji kharkoo, thy r sying tht to sm othr guys thy r sardar not singh;s..

n i think in 84 thr r sm group of kharkoos those r look like sikh's u can watch "hawaain" movie of babbu mann,, thy show the groups of kharkoos gd one n bad one,

sm groups r like sant ji who wants to fight for thr gd right n sm r fighting on the fingers of pakistan,,,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest militant singh
i think veer ji in movie thy r not sying bhindrawale ji kharkoo, thy r sying tht to sm othr guys thy r sardar not singh;s..

n i think in 84 thr r sm group of kharkoos those r look like sikh's u can watch "hawaain" movie of babbu mann,, thy show the groups of kharkoos gd one n bad one,

sm groups r like sant ji who wants to fight for thr gd right n sm r fighting on the fingers of pakistan,,,

dey were shwing real khakoos @ da start of da film -da 1;s in harmandir sahib b4 da attack -so dis mus mean dey mean Bhindranwale- Sikh Kharkoos not any Hindu CBI catz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think we should make our won movie on the shaheeds and tell the real story, media is the only way to get the truth across people, this movie just makes us look bad in the socaity, sikhs never killed any inocents nor took money forcefully. and y's dat gurbar akal, against the sikh freedom fighters, aint u a sikh ur self?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Narinder Singh
^not ALL were as you depict.... (though most were righteous) there were those who chose to profit from the climate in Punjab and killed innocents and stole money

The ones that killed innocents, raped women and looted weren't Khalistani jajaroos, they were guys who went crazy after their families were wiped out, they were random people taking advantage of the situation in punjab, or they were police cats shoutings slogans of "khalistan zindabaad" after gunning down innocent hindus. So please dont lump them all into the same category.

Fateh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I aint lumpin em in the same category but do you get why other people do? Random people that you talk of - no matter what you say- some were fully Bearded n turbaned...sikhs by name (not nature)... its like when you get muslims who do bad things n all those good muslims get tarred with the same brush...all I'm saying is some people don't have the same perspective as you and you can't always blame them for that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Narinder Singh
i think we should make our won movie on the shaheeds and tell the real story, media is the only way to get the truth across people, this movie just makes us look bad in the socaity, sikhs never killed any inocents nor took money forcefully. and y's dat gurbar akal, against the sikh freedom fighters, aint u a sikh ur self?
-soorma's post
^not ALL were as you depict.... (though most were righteous) there were those who chose to profit from the climate in Punjab and killed innocents and stole money
- your post

soorma was talking about the shaheedis (kharkoos), so yes you did lump them together veereh. :T:

And if our own people cant (or dont care to) differentiate between the jajaroo singhs and blood thirsty murderers of innocent people then what do we expect to tell the non-sikhs?

Fateh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was it really "khan" who did this encounter in Bombay.. or is bollywood just pulling the Muslims into it?

Yes virji it really was khan who carried out the shootout. But his name has been changed to 'shershah khan (in the movie)' from Aftab Ahmed Khan (the real ACP khan). Interestingly, the real khan of that time is the same man playin' the role of police commisioner in this movie!!!!

Secondly, why cany people accept that sikh ppl can also be terrorists, currupt or can kill mercilessly or extort money? Its perfectly human nature to become greedy on view of money. Some kharkoos (Bad ones) were really extorting money and the same are refferd to as terrorists and the movie. And i think that its right to call them terrorists and only they were those who made the whole community and country think that all kharkoos are like that and are 'terrorists'.

any debate on this is most wellcome...............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use