Jump to content

Imac Book + Windows?


JustME
 Share

Recommended Posts

i'll take ur apology, but dude, come on. I've had a mac for a year. I WAS one of you guys, the bookish nerd with a pc who would fool around with a pc all day long, trying to make it faster or break it trying, fixing other people's pcs, and spending endless months trying to make dual tv cards work on my media center pc. What do you think was the first thing I tried to do on my Mac? :umm: . Right clicks have been enabled from the start, I deleted boot camp after I realized that I didn't hate my pc, I hated windows, and now i keep windows relegated to a small 5 gig VIRTUAL hard drive. The OS is worthless, but unfortunately the applications are required for further human interaction over the internets. Oh, and if you have mac questions, i'm here occasionally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo jee ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo jee kee Fateh!

Well, I might give that macbook a chance, but i'll never switch over completely to the dark side... its either Windows or if not, linux, for me!

Waheguroo jee ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo jee kee Fateh!

I would consider Windows being the dark side. Both Linux and Mac are based on the unix core, and Mac has even at times borrowed code from Linux, such as safari taking from Konquerer and there have been numerous other occasions, also seeing as how Windows and Linux both try to copy the Mac's UI as much as they can, really does say something about the Mac OS in general.

I would have to give mac points over windows considering it realized the value of sticking with the original OS core instead of trying to make there own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo jee ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo jee kee Fateh!

Mac sticking with its original core? Do you know that MacOSX is actually FreeBSD? After Mac version 9 was a horrible failure, they took BSD (a unix like operating system) and adapted it for the mac. The difference is that for the linux GPL you need to contribute the code back, but for BSD, you don't need to.

So effectively, Mac swiped code from free software, claimed it their own, and is now taking credit for it. I do use linux once in a while, so i know its advantages, but whatever advantages that Mac has has been strongly "borrowed" from others. To me, the dark side are the ones who take from others and claim credit. Windows has been uniquely microsoft.

Waheguroo jee ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo jee kee Fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo jee ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo jee kee Fateh!

Mac sticking with its original core? Do you know that MacOSX is actually FreeBSD? After Mac version 9 was a horrible failure, they took BSD (a unix like operating system) and adapted it for the mac. The difference is that for the linux GPL you need to contribute the code back, but for BSD, you don't need to.

So effectively, Mac swiped code from free software, claimed it their own, and is now taking credit for it. I do use linux once in a while, so i know its advantages, but whatever advantages that Mac has has been strongly "borrowed" from others. To me, the dark side are the ones who take from others and claim credit. Windows has been uniquely microsoft.

Waheguroo jee ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo jee kee Fateh!

It's the BSD (unix) back bone that gives mac the security it needs. As far as windows being all Microsoft, well we may give them credit for making an effort to retool things the fact remains that Windows for the most part takes it cues of what it should do or add into its system primarily from mac.

At the very least I recognize Mac's ability to recognize good code and rather then try to remake it completely (Dos vs Unix, Aero vs Aqua, etc.) just take it and rename it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Waheguroo jee ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo jee kee Fateh!

Mac sticking with its original core? Do you know that MacOSX is actually FreeBSD? After Mac version 9 was a horrible failure, they took BSD (a unix like operating system) and adapted it for the mac. The difference is that for the linux GPL you need to contribute the code back, but for BSD, you don't need to.

So effectively, Mac swiped code from free software, claimed it their own, and is now taking credit for it. I do use linux once in a while, so i know its advantages, but whatever advantages that Mac has has been strongly "borrowed" from others. To me, the dark side are the ones who take from others and claim credit. Windows has been uniquely microsoft.

Waheguroo jee ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo jee kee Fateh!

Wow, can't believe I missed this, but Dude you're wrong. They didn't take FreeBSD, what happened during the tumultuous years when Steve Jobs left Apple, was that he went off and formed his own company called NeXT. Didn't do too much, but it's fun to look back at. Apple on the other hand, started sucking bad and somehow managed to go on until Mac OS 9. At that point there were huge disturbances in the company and they were hemoraging money. So, after firing their CEO, the new interim guy took a look at NeXT and bought it out right, bringing Steve and co. back to Apple. Within a year and a half, Jobs was back being CEO of apple and they started working on stuff further down the pipeline (Interestingly enough, it was around 1999 that Steve Jobs became CEO and he bought out the ideas for the iPod and the first iMac (gumdrop design)).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'm gonna be off topic but I wanna say how great MACS are!!!

I was an AVID WINDOWS user....from ME to VISTA....with many laptops over the years from HP to IBM to SONY and most recently ACER.

ACERs are CRAPPPPPY...build quality is laughable!!!

Anyway...as I work in the University, we get a educational discount. SO I bought a MacBook 2.13 GHZ....around 700 quid. Let me just say that its the best investment ever.....

Its build quality is excellent...the way the package it says it all really.

The software was something I was worried about...but MAC OS X just works!!! No issues at all...simple to use and very user friendly.

With Parallel Desktop installed I'm able to EAISLY switch between MAC and Windows (Windows to run scientific and math software) and with no lag in power.

Whatever base OS MAC is based upon..Apple is the way to go...everything Apple is excellent!!!!

MACS are great...full stop!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

same here. I have a blackbook (black macbook) 2.0 ghz, 1gb ram, and i dont need anything else. It'll probably last me all thru college, seeing as how i use it. And it IS very user-friendly...

i was thinking about getting windows at first, before i bought the macbook and saw os x, but now i'll just wait and maybe try leopard when tht comes out....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just go for the MAC>..really...I can do use both windows and mac os side by side using Parallels (am using it at the moment).

Its runs fine...OS X DOESNT crash...its just sweet!!

its the little things though that make it worth it..like the hibernation and sleep mode...you close the lid and its sleeps IMMEDIATELY!!!

You open the lid and it wakes up IMMEDIATELY!!!!

The build is excellent...it great!!!

I would go for the MAC....windows is doomed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use