Jump to content

respect


Recommended Posts

i think SGGS should be there only since it has been authored by the guru

dasam granth was a scattered collection of works, collected together

sarbloh granth has VERY obscure and dodgy origins....some may be bani but how can we be sure.......how manmat would it be to put some text which was by a regular guy next 2 that of guru jis, *IF* any of it is not really.

dasam granth should definately be treated like gurbani - ie covered, not in a library at home with other books or whatever, but it should not be next to sggs on the same level because if that was the way it was ment to be, guru gobind singh would have done this.

also some of the material in dasam granth should only be approached by very spiritually advanced and mature gursikhs, so doing daily hukamnamas from it (as some do i believe) is not a very good idea.

i have heard some gurmukhs actually produce dhur kee bani........like straight from waheguru.........but we do not put this on the same level as SGGS.......becuz it does not have the same authoring and seal of approval.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use