Jump to content

'84 Riots: Cbi Gets Time To File Report On Tytler


Mehtab Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://publication.samachar.com/pub_articl...ww.samachar.com

NEW DELHI: The CBI on Wednesday got some more time from a city court to file its report in an anti-Sikh riots case allegedly involving Congress leader Jagdish Tytler as key witness Jasbir Singh's petition to record his testimony in the US is pending before the Delhi High Court.

Taking into account the High Court's notice to CBI over Singh's petition seeking to record his version through video-conferencing from America, the court asked the agency to file its report under Section 173 CrPC (investigation report) on March 12.

The court had on December 18 ordered CBI to reinvestigate the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case, rejecting its closure report, after the witness surfaced in the United States and expressed his willingness to record his statement against Tytler.

The CBI had on September 29 sought to close the case against former Union Minister Tytler, declaring Singh, presently settled in California, as untraced.

The CBI, which was to file status report on Wednesday, submitted before the court that since the High Court had issued notice to it for February 27 on Singh's petition, the matter should be put off to a later date.

Singh had on January 11 filed a petition before the High Court seeking to quash a notice issued to him under Section 160 of the CrPC, which empowers the probe agency to seek presence of a witness.

He had sought direction to CBI to record his statement under Section 166 A (1) CrPC that entitles a non-resident Indian to testify in a foreign court at the request of the investigating agency.

The CBI, however, had argued that it was difficult for it record Singh's statement through video conferencing as his credentials were yet to be established.

In the arguments before the High Court, the CBI had also assured that it would not file any report, seeking closure of the case till the decision on Singh's petition.

The witness, in his affidavit before Nanavati Commission on August 31, 2000, had stated that he had overheard Tytler rebuking his men for nominal killing of Sikhs in his constituency on November 3, 1984.

The case relates to an incident on November 1, 1984 when a mob had set afire Gurudwara Pulbangash in Central Delhi, killing three persons in the riots following the assassination of the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use