A Pandit's Prophecy

[SaRpAnCh]

There is no basis to the Ayodhya crap, they even claimed they found Sita's belnah yes belnah for roti at that Site,but I thought Sita lived EVEN BEFORE the dinosaurs according to Hinduism.The baman is the most cleverest union/group of people ever known to man,just look at how they have operated since their birth,like a cancer

[Raju]

there is a lot of basis to Ayodhya crap ..

Are non-muslims even allowed entrance into Mecca ?

If a non-muslim is caught taking the Mecca exit on the highway or in the vicinity of the area demarcated as Mecca city then they are executed by a sharp swish of the sword.

What is more any non-muslim caught in Saudi Arabia with non-muslim holy books can be arrested or executed.

No temples, Churches are allowed anywhere inside Saudi Arabia.

Similarly there are no mosques or temples in Vatican.

ahh .. what broadmindedness

Why only in case of Hindus such liberties are being taken .. if you ask me no major religion of the world should not have any alien religious symbols polluting its holiest places.

If Catholicism or Islam aren't willing to accord such courtesies to other religions then why should Hindus allow this one way traffic ?

peace

[SaRpAnCh]

Well we now know your a Hindu,as Youtube comments and other sites by Hindus always cry about Saudi not allowing non Muslimn places of worship

[Raju]

For you I'm a Hindu waving the Indian flag.

And I am proud of it.

[apne]

there is a lot of basis to Ayodhya crap ..

Are non-muslims even allowed entrance into Mecca ?

If a non-muslim is caught taking the Mecca exit on the highway or in the vicinity of the area demarcated as Mecca city then they are executed by a sharp swish of the sword.

What is more any non-muslim caught in Saudi Arabia with non-muslim holy books can be arrested or executed.

No temples, Churches are allowed anywhere inside Saudi Arabia.

Similarly there are no mosques or temples in Vatican.

ahh .. what broadmindedness

Why only in case of Hindus such liberties are being taken .. if you ask me no major religion of the world should not have any alien religious symbols polluting its holiest places.

If Catholicism or Islam aren't willing to accord such courtesies to other religions then why should Hindus allow this one way traffic ?

peace

This is exactly what hindus are trying to do. They want to destroy everything non-hindu in India. Only their manner and approach is different. They are not Bamans for nothing. Like bania gandhi said "Hinduism is an ocean into which everything flows".

[Raju]

boss I was not willing to turn your pandit thread into a hindu banging session.

I used to pretty much think that hindus were wanting to have their cake and eat it too. But when you look at other countries esp in West you can see that their holy lands are unmolested and unviolated.

But here in North India every other place has a muslim name .. at one time in history these used to be very holy places for the Hindus. If you look at South India which was largely unmolested by Mughal rule, in TN, Kerala, South Karnatak etc the hindu places of worship and architecture is still unmolested and South India was always relatively lesser hinduised than north.

And then compare it to the barren landscape of the Northern plains devoid of any major symbols, the places of worship have been demolished or belittled, destroyed and made insignificant.

Let them make their temples Krishna and Ram's birthplace and let it be cleared of symbols of any other religion. Also Shiv's abode needs unhindered access all through the year.

then they will look like hypocrites if they come after other places.

this much I can tolerate.

[apne]

What about destroyed buddhist temples. The jains claim that the temple of Badrinath was originally a jain temple, overtaken forcibly by followers of shankracharya. The holy lands in west are unmolested because they were able to defend them. The hindus were not able to defend theirs. As were jews whose holy temple in jerusalem was destroyed by Roman armies. And don't forget that majority of muslim mosques in middle east are bulit on churhes.

The basic problem is that Sikhs defended and protected Hindus against Mughals. But the Hindus abandoned Sikhs after annexation of punjab by British and established Arya Samaj to help Christian Missionaries in cutting at the roots of Sikhism. And took anti-Sikh stand in 1984. Sikhs cannot and will not forget this injustice and shameful betrayal. Peace. Period.

[Raju]

I can understand Hindu feelings to certain extent. In my own community our people had bishops with names like Bishop Daud/Dawood (Islamised version of David), Bishop Yakub (Jacob) and Bishop Abdulla ..lol .. what the #$%#

Apparently it had happened after the crusades were lost and the turks or Arabs controlled areas around Antioch, Jerusalem etc. So the bishops and clergy and motley crowd of Christians who had stayed on in those areas had to dhimmify themselves and adopt muslim-type names. Later on during Roman period of Caesar they were chased off anyways and that's how they landed up in Iraq, Syria and also India.

Now just imagine that event on a much larger scale and you have hindus. If you do not allow a community their dignity they will behave in ways that these hindus are behaving today. If you give someone respect their behaviour will be quite different.

What about destroyed buddhist temples. The jains claim that the temple of Badrinath was originally a jain temple, overtaken forcibly by followers of shankracharya.

this comparison is not entirely relevant here, simply because of how the hindus debating and fighting amongst themselves was totally different from the way invaders from North-West treated them. For instance in Nalanda, which was buddhist centre they got to know the news that a guy named Khilji had defeated the local King and he was arriving in their direction. They buddhist monks were used to fights between local kings and one king defeating the other and they used to praise the new King .. and life went on. Life revolved around dharma and King was supposed to do his dharma and the praja (citizens) had their own dharma. So there was no great dissonance at such changes. So when Khilji came they thought it was business as usual ..

hey Khilji is a new King .. just another King who has defeated the local King. SO they all lined up with garlands in their hands to receive this new fellow. As soon as Khilji arrived, he saw these monks standing on both sides of the road with garlands in their hands and he chopped off all their heads without dismounting from his horse.