Jump to content

1984 Rally 2010, Hyde Park To Trafalgar Square


amzsingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

More images by a non-Sikh photographer (Peter Marshall) are at:

http://www.demotix.com/news/356205/sikhs-remember-1984-massacres

This is what he has written:

Sikhs Remember 1984 Massacres

Over 5000 Sikhs marched from Hyde Park to a Trafalgar Square rally to mark 26 years since the Indian Army attacked the Golden Temple at Amritsar in 1984, killing thousands. They called for an independent Sikh state, Khalistan. London, UK. 13/06/2010

The march was an entirely peaceful event, and relatively few of those taking part carried placards or wore t-shirts with political slogans, although there were a few banners. At last year's events police had raised objections to a number of placards and t-shirts with symbols of the proscribed organisation, Babbar Khalsa International - militant Sikhs regarded by the UK government as a terrorist group - as well as some with graphic images of massacre victims and some naming prominent India politicians with a graphic image of an anonymous head in a gun-sight. This year nothing similar was visible, with those taking part wearing normal Sikh dress or everyday clothes. The main banner at the front of the march simply called for 'Remembrance, Justice & Freedom.' Some carried small flags with a Sikh emblem and the text 'Khalistan Zindabad' - Long Live Khalistan.

As usual the march was led by two men carrying Sikh standards, and behind them the five baptised Sikhs, the “blessed ones” dressed in orange robes, walking barefoot and with their ceremonial swords held up. Other than this there was less theatre than on previous occasions, with only a relatively small number of people scattered among the crowd carrying black flags and a single black coffin being carried near the end of the march. Last year was something a special event as the 25th anniversary of the massacres, which perhaps accounts for the rather lower numbers this year.

This year it was still a sizeable march, with around 40 coaches bringing in Sikhs from around the country as well as many who had made their own way there, and by the time the rally began in Trafalgar Square (there had been a shorter rally at the start in Hyde Park) there were probably close to ten thousand present.

To one side in front of the stage at Trafalgar Square there were a few black coffins and some large slabs of flower arranging foam spelling out the year of the massacres, '1984'. Several thousand flowers were distributed among the audience who then lined up to plant these in the foam over around an hour while the speeches were continuing to form a floral tribute to those who died.

Almost half of the speeches in Trafalgar Square while I was there were in English, and a film shown on giant screens in two parts had English sub-titles. From what I heard as I was taking pictures this seemed a clear and relatively straightforward account of the events in India.

It's hard to avoid the conclusion that Britain made rather a mess of getting out of the Indian sub-continent shortly after the end of the Second World War. Partition itself was a particularly bloody process, and failed to take into consideration the needs and aspirations of smaller and less vocal communities such as the Sikhs. They had been loyal servants of the British Empire, many losing their lives in two World Wars fighting for it, and the British government felt they would continue as loyal servants of India.

The Indian Army launched Operation Blue Star in June 1984 against a group of Sikhs who were agitating for an independent Sikh state of Khalistan and were in the Golden Temple at Amritsar. The army attacked with tanks and heavy artillery, destroying much of the temple and, according to independent accounts, killing around 5000 Sikhs, many of them women and children (some Sikh sources put the figure around twice as high.)

Sikhs blamed Indian Prime Minister Indira Ghandi for ordering the attack, and in October 2004 the two Sikhs who were serving as her bodyguards opened fire and assassinated her. Following this, there was widespread mob violence against Sikhs, particularly around Delhi, incited by prominent members of the Congress party, with police often giving their active support, and many thousands were massacred across northern India.

Since 1984, both the fight for Khalistan and the persecution of Sikhs have continued, although attracting little news coverage in the outside world. Sikhs claim that over 250,000 Sikhs have been killed by in an orchestrated genocide by the Indian government. There were no photographers or reporters or TV crews from the major news organisations present at the start of the march in Hyde Park, and I saw none in Trafalgar Square.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use