Jump to content

More Dangerous Than Shariah: Hindutva


SarabhaPanjab
 Share

Recommended Posts

True, the situation with Sikhs & minorities in India is far more worse than it was of Kashmiri Pandits/Brahmins during the time of Aurangzeb.

Aurangzeb was forcing Brahmins Kashmiri Pandits and other non-Sunni's to accept and convert to Sunni-Islam, so pshychologically in a way, he was accpeting there is another identity / religion which is non-Islam and need to be converted to Islam rather than putting "Indian Hindus/Brahmins" under such a category such as "XYZ Muslims" i.e. a prefix XYZ before the word "Muslim" to identify them as Muslims but as a seperate category to identify them as XYZ muslim, but steal away their unique identity of Hindus/Brahmins/Kshyatrias etc. from them. Very similar to "Keshdhari Hindus" what Sikhs are referred to when giving rights to Sikhs. Think pshycologically, the current Hindu rulers are more cruel and barbaric than Aurangzeb. Brahmins and writers of Indian Constitution) have implictly and silently converted everybody to Hinduism (without any bloodshed).

Repeating, current Hindu rulers are more barbaric than Aurangzeb. They have implicitly and forcibly converted Sikhs/Buddhists/Jains/Shudhras etc. all to Hinduism by declaring them as Hindus in their written Consitution not agreeable and acceptable to anybody. This is no less cruel than what Aurangzeb was trying to do, his cruelity was seen openly as it used to result in bloodshed, the current Hindu rulers cruelty is hidden curelty which shows it's real faces every 5-10 years when genocide such as 1984/Babari Masjid/Godhra are openly declared by Hindu rulers.

http://superhindus.wordpress.com/hindutva-nothing-but-brahminic-sanathana-dharma/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Repeating, current Hindu rulers are more barbaric than Aurangzeb. They have implicitly and forcibly converted Sikhs/Buddhists/Jains/Shudhras etc. all to Hinduism by declaring them as Hindus in their written Consitution not agreeable and acceptable to anybody. This is no less cruel than what Aurangzeb was trying to do, his cruelity was seen openly as it used to result in bloodshed, the current Hindu rulers cruelty is hidden curelty which shows it's real faces every 5-10 years when genocide such as 1984/Babari Masjid/Godhra are openly declared by Hindu rulers.

http://superhindus.w...nathana-dharma/

Your comparing Hindus to the brutality of Auragzeb and the Moughals, this is just insanity !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Definitely the Guru Sahibs would be a heavier Scriptures to handle. Dasam Granth is more towards Bir Rass, Guru Gobind Singh showed his Greatness (of course, they would never say this) by separating his own Baania.  And the BIGGEST test of all?? Do we try and read Dasam Granth, Understand n show respect like we do to SGGS? Or... Do we QUESTION it? Guru Gobind Singh Ji is testing us. 
    • My wife will be going for an MRI scan next week but her Kara won’t physically come off.  Is there any way the mri scan can be done with the Kara still on?  The alternative is we will have to try to saw it off before the scan.  
    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use