Jump to content

How The Authorities Attempted To Bribe Sant Jarnail Singh Ji Bhindranwale And Failed: Sant Dhadrianwale Tell The Unique Remarkable Account


Recommended Posts

A MUST WATCH CLIP - READ & FORWARD:

Sarkar Di Chall - Sant Bhindranwalean Da Jawab

HOW THE AUTHORITIES ATTEMPTED TO BRIBE SANT JARNAIL SINGH JI BHINDRANWALE AND FAILED: Sant Dhadrianwale Tell The Unique Remarkable Account To Thousands

- NO UK VISIT FOR SUMMER 2012 -

18th August 2012

During the monthly Sangrand Samagam which takes place at Gurdwara Parmeshar Dwar Sahib in Patiala, standing on the stage in front of the thousands of people present on 16th August 2012, Sant Baba Ranjit Singh Dhadrianwale spoke about the Jeevan of the great fearless Saint Soldier, Sant Baba Jarnail Singh Ji Khalsa Bhindranwale during their years of conflict with the Central and Punjab Government in the 1980's, particularly during the Congress rule of Punjab Chief Minister Darbara Singh.

In an effort to inspire the Sikh youth of Punjab, Sant Dhadrianwale discussed an account that was given in a book written by General Brar who commanded Operation Bluestar in 1984. The general, who was in opposition to Sant Jarnail Singh Ji, in actual fact himself gave away how the great Saint Soldier was simply beyond any bribe. Sant Dhadrianwale spoke about the initial threatening challenges of Darbara Singh to Sant Jarnail Singh Ji, which failed, and then the subsequent offers and bribes from the authorities, which also failed.

In the meanwhile, there have recently been expectations in the UK for Sant Dhadrianwale to visit the country during this summer for a few days due to immense demand from the Sangat and from the organisers of a number of events taking place in the coming weeks and events that have already taken place. However, Sant Baba Ranjit Singh Dhadrianwale, who live and breathe for Gurmat Parchaar and Amrit Sanchaar, have had a very tight schedule which has been fully booked until at least next year. Unless where an international Gurmat Parchaar Visit has been scheduled, Sant Dhadrianwale is believed to have said there is a greater need for them to remain in India at this moment in time as per their schedule where Gurmat Parchaar and Amrit Sanchaar must remain to be the number one priority. Gurdwara Parmeshar Dwar Sahib sends out an apology to any Sangat and organisers who may have been expecting them to be present in the UK for a few days this summer, but if and when a window in their schedule is available, then the UK will be considered for Parchaar purposes. In any event, the main UK Visit for Gurmat Parchaar, which takes place every two years, will be scheduled for the summer of 2013, confirmation and dates for which will be released mid-next year by the UK Visit organisers.

The full August 2012 Sangrand Diwaan can be seen online and a short clip that every Sikh should and must watch is viewable at the following link:

- ENDS -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly, there is not an ounce of evidence that Brar ever said those things that Dhadrianwala is promoting on stage.

I am not talking about Sant Ji's Nitnem, but stuff like the challenge from CM Darbara Singh, the bribe of lunatic amount of money plus citizenship in other countries.

Brar has already stated he never wrote that book that the Sant-Smajis are promoting. We Sikhs love to make up such fairy tales.

* If there is any evidence, then can anyone please name the 14 "officers" sent in by the govt that joined Sant Ji on that one day?

*When Darbara Singh was the CM, Sant Ji was in Nanak Nivaas. When Sant Ji was at Akal Takht Sahib, Darbara Singh was not the CM. So who ever made up this story does not even know the proper events of history.

*Outside the reference to the fake book, is there any ounce of evidence that the ridiculous example of that bribe took place?

Even the amount of army men killed that is quoted in the book are a gross exaggeration. Do we really need to lie to show our prowess?

When did lying and making up tall tales about of great Singhs become part of Sikhi and Gurmat? There is plenty of proof our Singhs were great without resorting to lies and writing fake book under other people's names.

It is videos like this that give further credence to the GOI agencies that we Sikhs live in fairy-tale land and not in reality.

Dhadrianwala is a great story teller, but this does not make him a historian only an entertainer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly, there is not an ounce of evidence that Brar ever said those things that Dhadrianwala is promoting on stage.

I am not talking about Sant Ji's Nitnem, but stuff like the challenge from CM Darbara Singh, the bribe of lunatic amount of money plus citizenship in other countries.

Brar has already stated he never wrote that book that the Sant-Smajis are promoting. We Sikhs love to make up such fairy tales.

* If there is any evidence, then can anyone please name the 14 "officers" sent in by the govt that joined Sant Ji on that one day?

*When Darbara Singh was the CM, Sant Ji was in Nanak Nivaas. When Sant Ji was at Akal Takht Sahib, Darbara Singh was not the CM. So who ever made up this story does not even know the proper events of history.

*Outside the reference to the fake book, is there any ounce of evidence that the ridiculous example of that bribe took place?

Even the amount of army men killed that is quoted in the book are a gross exaggeration. Do we really need to lie to show our prowess?

When did lying and making up tall tales about of great Singhs become part of Sikhi and Gurmat? There is plenty of proof our Singhs were great without resorting to lies and writing fake book under other people's names.

It is videos like this that give further credence to the GOI agencies that we Sikhs live in fairy-tale land and not in reality.

Dhadrianwala is a great story teller, but this does not make him a historian only an entertainer.

I have to agree with this. I was thinking about not posting, but I'm just quoting to say I agree.

The problem isn't that Baba Ranjit Singh Dhadrianwala is intentional/unintentionally promoting this misinformation, it's that some groups try to sway what the truth is and change what history is. Sometimes it's hard to figure out what the agenda of these groups are until a lot later on.

The Indian government attacked Harmandir Sahib to kill Sikhs, why would they want to stop the attack or bribe Sant Jarnail Singh Khalsa Bhindranwale? Sant Jarnail Singh Khalsa Bhindranwale and the other Singhs of 1984 were babbar shers and knew very well what the indian government wanted to do and were there to defend Harmandir Sahib complex.

S.K. Sinha said if they attack the Sikh's holiest place, SIkhs have a right to defend it like Sikhs did of past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use