Jump to content

sat nam rasayan


namastebc
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes, I've had a session with a friend who practiced it. I wasn't sick or anything but I just wanted to experience it to see what it was all about. I've heard of people benefitting from it. Personally, he told me to strengthen my navel area and prescribed me a meditation. I've been practicing it ever since, it's a short exercise 11 minutes a day. I would say it has benefitted me but the effects are subtle and you notice them over time.

Sometimes they prescribe meditations, yoga or both. It is expensive though. There are practitioners across the world and they've all learned from Guru Dev Singh or from his students. Guru Dev Singh is a very intuitive healer but he charges a lot for his time. He's the only person in the 3HO that Yogi Bhajan calleed a sadhu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Guru Dev singh?

hes is the bhai sahib to go to?

The bhai sahib to go to is Guroo Granth Sahib. He is true Bhai Sahib, only He is Maharaj. True Mahraj. he can heal anything and anyone with shardha. I have never heaqrd of Guroo Dev Singh, but sounds like he is a Sikh and called guru. that is confusing, he may be yoga guru, but can call himself yogi or master, or something. not guru. thats confusing western sikhs. its all about the real mahaaraaaj, bhai sahib bhai guru granth sahib ji..i love you guru gobind singh ji <3

dhan dhan guroo granth sahib maharaj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guru Dev singh?

hes is the bhai sahib to go to?

The bhai sahib to go to is Guroo Granth Sahib. He is true Bhai Sahib, only He is Maharaj. True Mahraj. he can heal anything and anyone with shardha. I have never heaqrd of Guroo Dev Singh, but sounds like he is a Sikh and called guru. that is confusing, he may be yoga guru, but can call himself yogi or master, or something. not guru. thats confusing western sikhs. its all about the real mahaaraaaj, bhai sahib bhai guru granth sahib ji..i love you guru gobind singh ji <3

dhan dhan guroo granth sahib maharaj

Before we discuss this matter further I wanted to know if we are discussing about the same Guru. I believe ONLY Larivaar saroop is our guru and pad chad is not. What do you believe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before we discuss this matter further I wanted to know if we are discussing about the same Guru. I believe ONLY Larivaar saroop is our guru and pad chad is not. What do you believe?

the bani is still bani. just because it isn't joined up doesnt mean it still isnt our guru, the shabad, the message is guru. but i do agree with you, larivaar should be used, as it is the original form of writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the bani is still bani. just because it isn't joined up doesnt mean it still isnt our guru, the shabad, the message is guru. but i do agree with you, larivaar should be used, as it is the original form of writing.

Bani has to be perfect ie larivaar. Satguru is perfect therefore gurbani must be perfect. Is pad chad perfect? So many mistakes made in these saroops. Netri satgur pekna - How can this happen if our satguru isn't in the correct format?

Like one of my veers preetam singh said from Gurmatbibek forum -

Pad-ched can never be good.

"Nothing good has come out of Pad-ched and nothing can. All the expansion that you speak of is the exact example of what the problem in the Panth is. Too many fake "Sikhs" following a fake "Guru".

There is no Sikhi without Guru Granth Sahib jee. And Pad-ched is not Guru."

I agree with him if we didn't do beadbi to guru ji then the shaheed singhs would look after us and the panth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with him if we didn't do beadbi to guru ji then the shaheed singhs would look after us and the panth.

Shaheed singhs are looking after panth. you have not the eyes to see this yet i dont think. i joke, i have vohath prem for sadsangat

and i think all bani is guroo, infact, pavan is guroo too...the air! pavan guroo, panee pitha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe in pad ched and larivaar.But going hellbent on one thing is to crazy .What about people who desire to do a sehej paath from the guru Granth sahib ji and dont know how to read larivaar.Then what do you say.The taksal said the do sehej paath of pad ched 5 times then embark on larivaar.

So people who have been bowing their heads to pad ched granths got it all wrong?I say take what you can get and stop whining about one thing.

I have both pad ched and larivaar granths but I won't put larivaar higher than pad ched.They are the same.

Bhai mani Singh shouldn't have split the guru Granth sahib ji to make pothis then.He got scolding from the sangat then.Three hundred years later we use pothis.The taksal makes pothis.This is wrong?

Please don't get hellbent on one thing.Sorry if I offended anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use